Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Question on MPPI Paymentshield


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK thanks to the help and advice I've received on here, I am underway with my PPI claims (one letter sent and one SAR done!!)

 

My brother asked me about his MPPI which he bought through a broker when he got his mortgage with A &L. It was made clear to him at the time that he had to have this MPPI with Paymentshield so he got it.

He took out the mortgage and MPPI in 2005.

 

A quick google tells me that Paymentshield claim they are very different to the PPI organisations and that there is no point claiming against them as they have not missold.

 

Is this true?

 

My brother would certainly not have gotten this MPPI if he hadn't been made to think it was compulsary.

 

Does he have a claim and if he does, who does he start with? The broker or Paymentshield (that's who the payments are to each month)

Any advice very gratefully received on this!

 

Anybody please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

MPPI is very similar to PPI and if it was mis-sold then you should at least out in a claim to the company that you were paying the premiums to.

 

I would use the standard approach of spreadsheet of claim and fos questionnaire.

 

Have a look at some other MPPI claims on the site....CAG search facility top right

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ims. I will have a look.

Just wasn't sure if anyone had anyone on here had any success with this company as there doesn't seem to be much about them on the internet other than a lot of literature from them stating that the MPPI they sell is not like other MPPI and they won't pay out, also that people need to be educated in the difference (which I do!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view they would say that to put people off reclaiming.

 

If anyone has any suspicion that they have been mis-sold a protection policy on a loan then in my opinion they should try and reclaim.

 

As with anything, there are no guarantees but unless you try you will never know.

 

fos is also a route that is open if the company refuse to cough

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ims.

I said I would help him with this, even though I'm feeling pretty clueless!

Will email him the link to the spreadsheet.

Can I ask, he knows how much he paid each month to them but how would he go about filling in the spreadsheet? Under you guidance I filled this out for my Barclay card but that was different because it was a store card so I filled in the 'payments out' ie charges and all payments made each month.

For mortgage PPI in this case to a separate company how does he fill in the spreadsheet and is it the 'StatIntSheetV101.xls' he would use for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep that's the correct spreadsheet

 

Just list the payments made with the date of payment, the description and the amount. The sheet will do the rest.

 

"Claim to" date is right up to now.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant. Thank you!

Looks like an afternoon tomorrow filling that in with him then. :)

 

When we looked at the paperwork he had I couldn't find any interest rate for what he was paying then. With the Barclaycard one you had suggested 24.9% (and let them work it out! :lol:) but that seems very high for this. He was paying on average £30 per month and his monthly morgage payments were £680 according to the paperwork I've got here.

What would you suggest we put for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The premium was a separate payment from the mortgage.

 

As it was not part of a loan agreement there is not contractual interest to claim because no interest was paid.

 

If you are successful you will get back the premiums plus 8% statutory interest.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Ims. You're a star.

You're right of course. I think it's my bedtime because I wasn't reading the spreadsheet correctly! :lol:

Off to bed now and start on this tomorrow! It's quite addictive this reclaiming malarkey! :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, Im new and googled a similair situation and it brought me here. Id be interested to know how you get on with this as I also took out paymentshield unemployment cover through a broker/solicitor and feel I have been misled. At the time a explained to him my job situation and felt it wasnt the right thing for me as my job is pretty sound (well it was 7 yr ago) and i get full pay on the sick. Now I discover its been for only unemployment not sickness when I told him I wanted neither. The reason I have recently discovered it is because it comes from my partners account and she mistakenly thought the DD was for something else entirely...for 7 yr!:mad2:

 

Would you let us all know how you get on OP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I have had the same problems. I got MPPI from Paymentshield back in 2000 via an 'independent' financial advisor in Spicer McColl where I purchased my house. He too told me I had to have MPPI (was my first purchase and I believed him) amongst other things. Have been trying since November to get recompense from either Paymentshield or Mortgages Direct who the agent worked for.

 

As Mortgages Direct weren't registered with the FSA on or after Jan 2005, the FSA can do nothing (apparently).

 

As Paymentshield did not sell me the policy direct they are not liable. The FSA has been looking in to this for 8 months and I have just received my 'sorry we can't help letter'.

 

I have since found out Mortgages Direct come under the umbrella of Spicer McColl but I cannot claim off them either.

 

I hope others have a bit more luck than I did!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

It would be best if you started your own threads with regard to your issues rather than hijack skyrocket's.

 

As a starter though, if fos won't help and if you were paying your MPPI separately you may need to claim from the underwriter as it is likely that your direct debit payments were going to them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

threadis 6 yrs old you wont get seen here

please start a new thread

 

thread now closed to stop repeated newbie bumping

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...