Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard/EGG card - wrong default date


RedPillGuy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Having read through what seems like 1000's of posts I wanted to see if anyone can assist.

 

I have a Barclaycard with a balance of around £7900, and an Egg card now transferred to Barclaycard with a balance of £10500.

 

Due to a significant change of circumstances I have written to them to outline my financial difficulties, they had initially agreed a reduced payment plan, but even this I am not able to meet at the moment.

 

Looking at their corresponance it does not appear that they have not actually defaulted me yet, however I have started to recieve Mercers letters on both cards.

 

On 23/3/12 I requested copies of the CCA on both accounts, and they acknowledged receipt of the request on 27/03/12.

 

I know that some of the law around CCA has changed over the last few years, but am I right that after 14 working days, I should write to them saying that I place the accounts in dispute? The further 30 days is no longer applicable?

 

I MAY be in a position in a few months, with the generosity of a relative, to make a F&F offer, but I wanted to confirm that they have a valid CCA before making such an offer. Any advice on this?

 

I understand my credit record will be hit for 6 years, but think I can live with that. Just wanted to get all the pain out of the way now (if they have not yet defaulted me yet) to start the 6 years ticking on the credit record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dewatt,

 

Same response as your other question - only difference is the Mercers are still Barclay's - it's Barclay's in-house DCA!

 

Copied, pasted and edited below from thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?345419-MBNA-Virgin-CC(17-Viewing)-nbsp - post #2

 

Hi Dewatt,

 

If you have received no response within 14 days then you should have sent in the account in-dispute letter, if not sent, send it now.

30 days for a CCA request no longer applies.

 

Pay what you can afford - if your on benefits or you income has dropped to a low level than £1 a month.

As Barclay's are in default of your CCA request, you can legally stop payments until they comply.

 

Barclay's will eventually farm it out to a DCA.

 

Any PPI and charges to claim back?

 

When offering a Full and final - get everything in writing, make sure it is stated that the remainder of the debt will not be sold on, your credit file is reflected as a full settlement and even try and get the default removed.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stigman, I have recieved an acknowledgement of CCA request on one account on 27th march, and on the other account 10th April. Guess the Egg card is not fully integrated with BC yet and is being handled seperately. Given the CCA request was sent on 23rd March (Day 0), and with Easter, the 14 working days don't expire until 17th April, so will wait and see what comes back

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update 1 - On the original Barclaycard

It still looks like they have not defaulted me, as I have received statements for March and April still showing interest and late payment fees being applied.

A couple of letters and calls from Mercers but no default notice.

I have received a response to my CCA request dated 11th April stating that they enclose a reconstituted copy of the agreement, but all that was inclosed was a single page with the "right to cancel" declaration. In a seperate letter they enclosed their current T&C.

 

Update 2 - On the transferred Egg card

A couple of Mercers letters

A Default notice on 14th March, but curiously the April 27th statement still adds interest and late payments - so have they not exercised the default notice?

CCA Request response on 16th April with latest T&C and a reconstituted Egg aggreement - it has my name and old address on a blank page (with Right to cancel) then a standard egg T&C but nothing to show it relates to me at all - no dates etc.

 

Should I submit CPUTR letters on both to confirm if they actually hold valid CCA?

 

I

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update - CPUTR letters sent with no response at all.

Checking Equifax and Call Credit, both accounts are showing as late payment but not defaulted, so they are still adding interest.

F&F offer letter sent but no response.

Letters from Mercers and now a letter from Calder Financial regarding only one account.

 

Next steps? place the accounts in dispute?

 

It seems like they are just ignoring me, all the while being able to keep on adding interest. Any way that I can force a default just to stop the interest being added?

Any other suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
  • 5 months later...

Quick question

- On the Egg card,

the DN was issued by Mercers (on Barclaycard letterhead) on 14 March 2012.

 

However , on my credit files the default is not showing as listed until 15/8/12 some 5 months later.

 

now I'm happy I can show that its SB some time aound March,

but does anyone know if I can get the Credit file entries removed earlier if I can provide the DN to them?

 

Why would they wait 5 months to actually file the default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

because they can and they know full well that mercers DN were defective anyway.

 

when was the first missed payment...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then write to BC and complain

tell them under the ICO rules at the time the default should have been registered following the third missed payment

give them 14 days to rectify else you'll complain to the ICO and also seek financial compensation

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they know them

no need

short and simple only no waffle

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...