Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Blair Oliver Scott Help


JULI99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My other half took out a loan, no ppi, but charges which he successfully claimed back.

 

Due to being unemployed for a while he defaulted on the loan and came to an arrangement to pay the loan back.

 

After 6 years the loan disappeared from his credit file. He is continuing to pay each month without fail but since the loan disappeared from his credit file Blair O.S. have gotten really shirty.

 

First they sent a letter saying something along the lines that despite asking over and over for the whole balance to be repaid he had not done so and if he did not repay the whole of the balance within a week that people would call round etc. Having looked around the site seemed to be a standard letter. He had not had anyone asking for the whole amount ever. Having looked more closely at the letter and tried to match up with his own records he cannot work out the discrepancy between what he thinks he owes and what Blair say he owes.

 

He has sent off a S.A.R. with the £10 (had to borrow from his mum) in order to get a full picture of what has happened. He told them he didn't recognise the account and until he recieved the statements etc the account would be in dispute. He has no intention of stopping payments to them but would like to know that the balance that he is knocking off his monthly payments from is the same balance from which Blair have.

 

This was followed by a call from Blair which he couldn't answer or reply to because he was out, then a letter saying papers were being put together for court action.

 

Can they do anything if he has never missed a payment, he has continued to pay on time each month and the actual loan has disappeared from his credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is not statute barred as payments are being made,

yes they can take court action, they probably consider that

it will take to long to clear the debt on the current payment

level.

ALL accounts fall off credit files PAID or NOT this does not

affect the status of the debt, for SB there must have been no

payment or written acknowledgment for 6 clear years.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is not trying to get out of paying it is more the fact that there is a difference of about £450 between what he thinks should be paid and what B.O.S have on their records.

He really wants to get it sorted before he gets to the final few months. If he has made an error then fine but equally he would like to know what exactly he owes.

 

For all he knows some payments might have been credited to someone else's account.

 

It hadn't crossed his mind to get out of paying

 

He feels really aggrieved that for the past 5 years he has paid every month without fail and is continuing to pay even though things are getting tighter and tighter and he is in the last three years and all of a sudden he is getting nasty letters about taking him to court. Surely even if they took him to court they would have to present statements which is what he is after.

 

Can Blair take someone to court if they have agreed to a payment plan and the person is paying each month as agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • No one especially me, has made any judgment on this,
  • I clearly stated the status of the debt.
  • It is simply that the debt is ''live'' and the current owners are seeking payment.
  • A statement should be provided yearly.
  • yes they can try to enforce the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is, it doesn't mean anything if a DCA has agreed to a payment plan they can rescind it at any point.

 

As for statements being sent yearly, he has never received any statements from them ever. he just has the balance Sainsburys told him when it was handed to B.O.S. and he has been deducting what he pays each month from that.

 

What he doesn't understand and is finding most upsetting is he is well over half way through repaying this loan and they have pulled the rug from under his feet. One payment plan is due to finish in 4 months and he then he would have been able to pay more to Blair Oliver and Scott but it doesn't look like that is going to happen.

 

Blair could end up with nothing. Without going in to too much detail he has had the talk with his dr over how long he has. I have tried to take the stress out of things for him and things have settled down but he opened the letter from Blair and was visibly shaken. I feel that letter has done serious damage to his health. Even if they took him to court I cannot see what they are trying to achieve as if there is nothing there how can he repay what he doesn't have. It is more than likely that he will be off work through ill health or the worse could happen and I can assure B.O.S. that they will get absolutely zilch. He did have the bailiffs round a few years ago and they left empty handed as he does not own anything of any value.

 

At the moment he is paying what he can afford. the debt would be paid off in the next 3 years and having read around the site there are others whose debts are going to take longer to repay than his and there are those that will never repay at all as they owe thousands and are repaying at £1 per month. He has repaid about 70% of the loan and just cannot understand their thinking on the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is, it doesn't mean anything if a DCA has agreed to a payment plan they can rescind it at any point.

 

As for statements being sent yearly, he has never received any statements from them ever. he just has the balance Sainsburys told him when it was handed to B.O.S. and he has been deducting what he pays each month from that.

 

What he doesn't understand and is finding most upsetting is he is well over half way through repaying this loan and they have pulled the rug from under his feet. One payment plan is due to finish in 4 months and he then he would have been able to pay more to Blair Oliver and Scott but it doesn't look like that is going to happen.

 

Blair could end up with nothing. Without going in to too much detail he has had the talk with his dr over how long he has. I have tried to take the stress out of things for him and things have settled down but he opened the letter from Blair and was visibly shaken. I feel that letter has done serious damage to his health. Even if they took him to court I cannot see what they are trying to achieve as if there is nothing there how can he repay what he doesn't have. It is more than likely that he will be off work through ill health or the worse could happen and I can assure B.O.S. that they will get absolutely zilch. He did have the bailiffs round a few years ago and they left empty handed as he does not own anything of any value.

 

At the moment he is paying what he can afford. the debt would be paid off in the next 3 years and having read around the site there are others whose debts are going to take longer to repay than his and there are those that will never repay at all as they owe thousands and are repaying at £1 per month. He has repaid about 70% of the loan and just cannot understand their thinking on the situation.

Ask them to provide you with the CCA for the loan,it will cost a quid but its well worth trying,and don't worry.
Link to post
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is, it doesn't mean anything if a DCA has agreed to a payment plan they can rescind it at any point.

 

As for statements being sent yearly, he has never received any statements from them ever. he just has the balance Sainsburys told him when it was handed to B.O.S. and he has been deducting what he pays each month from that.

 

What he doesn't understand and is finding most upsetting is he is well over half way through repaying this loan and they have pulled the rug from under his feet. One payment plan is due to finish in 4 months and he then he would have been able to pay more to Blair Oliver and Scott but it doesn't look like that is going to happen.

 

Blair could end up with nothing. Without going in to too much detail he has had the talk with his dr over how long he has. I have tried to take the stress out of things for him and things have settled down but he opened the letter from Blair and was visibly shaken. I feel that letter has done serious damage to his health. Even if they took him to court I cannot see what they are trying to achieve as if there is nothing there how can he repay what he doesn't have. It is more than likely that he will be off work through ill health or the worse could happen and I can assure B.O.S. that they will get absolutely zilch. He did have the bailiffs round a few years ago and they left empty handed as he does not own anything of any value.

 

At the moment he is paying what he can afford. the debt would be paid off in the next 3 years and having read around the site there are others whose debts are going to take longer to repay than his and there are those that will never repay at all as they owe thousands and are repaying at £1 per month. He has repaid about 70% of the loan and just cannot understand their thinking on the situation.

 

Yes any ''agreement'' to pay reduced amounts can be recinded at any time.

IMS21 suggestion to send A Subject Access Request to the original creditor

is good.

There is aa £10.00 fee for this and they have 40 days to comply, use

the template letter from the CAG library and edit to suit

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...