Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

old Lombard CCJ/CO - shoe's Want more than the Judge Ordered


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help with this one, Lombards took my partner to Court and he was given a CCJ plus they were also granted a deed to his house. They now want an updated expenditure form to review payments I guess, but should he ask for his original credit agreement??? evn though it has gone through court???

 

 

Mashmallow8-):mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is subject to a CCJ then there is no point asking for a copy of the CCA. However, they cannot up the payments, they were set by the judge. Tell them to bog off ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the court made an order with regards to payments you comply with that, you do not have to respond to Lombards. If they want an increase in payments they would have to apply to the court to do so & have a very good reason.

 

 

e7y0eb.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello Guys and Girls,

 

Just wondered if anyone could help. We had a unsecured loan with Lombards when eventually because of arrears they took it to court and placed a charging order alongside. This was about 2 years ago still paying it. Today they have passed the debt onto Arden who will now be collecting it. Can they do this seeing as it was through the court?

 

Many thanks

 

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Cerb,

 

Its been a long time since we talked, I have missed you, sad aint I. Can you please spare me a couple of minutes.

My partner had an unsecured loan from Lombards went through the court and the DJ agreed he paid back £20 per month, Lombards did not turn up in court. A week later or there so notification was sent that they had put a charge on his/our property which we did not contest, knowing none the less. Paid off £20 per month the debt from about

£4000 has about £2300 left. Now the debt has been passed to Ardmore DCA to collect the payments. All I want to know is can they do this as it had gone through the courts. Also I asked for the credit agreement which they sent,

a dark photocopy of an unreadable agreement that looks like a scrap bit of paper.

 

What chance have we got in an argument?

 

I would really appreciate your assistance in this matter.

 

many thanks

 

Mashmallow

 

XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Any advice please,

 

 

Had a paersonal loan with Lombards,

 

 

fell into arrears,

 

 

taken to court,

 

 

payment of £20 was agreed by DJ at the time,

 

 

at the same time a charging order was placed on the property which we did not know.

 

 

Now the debt has been passed on the Shoosh..

 

 

they are asking for and I/E form to be completed in order for them to review payments,

 

 

Every time they phone I shout a load of abuse and then they ring again next day.

 

 

I told them if they wanted anything more to take it back to court but they carry on calling continually.

 

 

I am sure they have no right to know our income when the DJ has already agreed we pay 20.00 per month.

 

 

Please tell me if I am wrong or right and how to deal with these people.

Edited by honeybee13
Problem word edited.
Link to post
Share on other sites

quite correct

 

inform the court they are trying to over rule a judgement

 

and the oft for harrassment

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and get reclaiming

 

most lomabard loans are +50% PENALTY FEES and PPI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ever so much site team I will inform the court - how do I claim for the charges when I have no records to hand.Please help, also is there a standard letter to reclaim?regards,Just for info Spratts was the original solicitors who took us to court and now passed it over to Shoosmiths

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need all the statements for the loan

 

sar lombards or wjho you were/are paying

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Site team,

 

I have looked into some of my paperwork and found the origin claim form from Banbury County court,

 

I cannot find the judgement one.

 

At that time we sent in an I/E sheet stating that my partner could only afford £20 and it was agreed to date.

 

The charge order was at Romford Court on a seperate occasion whilst the debt was being dealt with at Banbury.

 

Shoosmiths are still harassing and demanding an I/E sheet to be completed otherwise further action.

 

Where does he stand with this.

 

I have already sent off an harrassment letter and also a SAR.

 

Please can you help with this matter.

 

Regards,

 

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

only a judge can demand an I&E sheet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...