Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SAR's


jabba jones
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4428 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a few question for those on here who have submitted SAR's to the DWP.

 

It's something that is recommended on here on a regular basis & I was wondering just how useful it is.

 

Has anyone received information that has actually helped them with their case?

 

I presume what you receive will include potentially thousands of pages of computer screen prints. Most of them will be totally irrelevant, but how have you managed to find the parts that important to your query?

 

I know from my previous roles that DWP internal abbreviations can differ from office to office never mind between the different benefits, you've then got form/letter numbers, benefit decision numbers etc etc.

 

Is it a case of confusing information overload or a useful tool?

 

I'm not trying to put anyone off, just genuinely interested of how people have got on because so few appear to come back & mention how helpful the SAR was for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My SAR was the best 1200 pages I have ever seen.

 

Identified so many 'maladministrations' and provided me with a copy of an internal document the DWP had previously claimed did not exist.

 

Well worth the trawling through the paperwork for me :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen quite a few SAR responses. The DWP normally include a list of abbreviations in alphabetical order. They have proven extremely useful in most circumstances, either identifying errors the DWP have made or clearing up a misunderstanding. But in recent years, I have noted an increase in non official abbreviations being used - that's usually for clerical records. System abbreviations usually are all the same with information such as capital input by staff.

 

Saying that, I deal with these things fairly often so depending on the benefit involved, I may know exactly what it is I am looking for and in some cases, where to find it. For some claimants I imagine that it could be very confusing when the bundle first arrives. However, SAR's tend to be like that in almost every company, with abbreviations being used and confusing record/account prints. When I first stated doing it, I would look to the list of abbreviations to identify what the abbreviation was for the area I wanted to find out about. I'd then scan the pages to look for that particular abbreviation and voila - there it was, along with the information I wanted. Now I usually know where to find it, it's like recognising a picture, the way the page is set out, so I can just flick through the paperwork to find the relevant print.

 

It also used to be very easy to simply ring and speak directly to an experienced DM when we weren't sure of the meaning of some information but with the contact centres in place now, it's not so easy. I can waste a whole day trying to find out the meaning of one line of information. The contact centres often don't know themselves and trying to speak to a DM who probably will know what the meaning is, is like trying to get into fort knox.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. If it's getting more difficult for someone like Erika to follow it must be a nightmare for anyone with even a basic knowledge of benefits to try to decipher.

 

I remember a couple of internal forms that were created specifically by the office that I worked in. They were used to notify I/S section of a change in an I/B award, a suspension or a medical result & vice versa. They were given names that when abbreviated sounded rude. I wonder how many people have requested their records & have had to trawl through the official abbreviations list trying to figure out what a ****1 is!

 

These forms were quickly renamed as the DPA became more prevalent & I guess SAR's started to come in, but the original names will still be listed on computer records of older claims.

 

I also remember there was plenty of overtime available in 1998 just to cleanse & weed the thousands & thousands of claim documents that back then were held in every office. The powers that be were terrified of just what information was being held about people. It was not unusual to open a GBU (I/B claim papers file) & find press cuttings describing the illegal activities of some of our more notorious customers amongst other things.

 

All long gone now but they did make things more interesting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...