Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lewis/CL Finance - old RSS Classic Visa Credit Card Debt


davrym
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4378 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Morning to all the midnight oil burners. Received letter from Lewis Debt Recovery on Friday demanding 220.88 to be paid by 21/02/12. They give a 16 digit reference number and then notice isapparently issued on behalfof sombody called CL Finance.

 

Telephoned them yesterday to find out what the debt was relating to but once I confirmed my name and the reference on the letter I was asked to provide my date of birth for security reasons. I refused on the basis that they did not have that information so how could they use it for security. I was told they do hold my D.O.B on record and the lady refused to speak on the account any further unless I gave her this information. I ended the call.

 

I do not know what the supposed debt is for. I have never hadany dealings with either of these companies. I have since discovered by my own means that the reference on their letter is a 16 digit vsa card number. The only Visa card I had was many years ago, probably 8 years ago.

 

They threaten the usual - further action - doorstep collection. Howcan they do this if they will tell me what the supposed debt relates to.

 

Thank you for reading thisand hopefully someone can advise me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them

 

they are trying to spoof you into paying

a statute barred debt

 

to be sure

check your cra file

 

details below

 

dx

 

ps never ever ring a dca they have no legal power to do nowt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them this letter

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?428-General-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt#

 

print do not sign your name and stay off the phone they will try trick you on the phone into admiting that the debt is yours. I had a simular experince with Active Kaptil for a debt which wasnt mine i used this letter and they went away and had to pay me 50 pounds for my trouble

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just a quick update. Got a response to the prove it letter stating that the debt relates to a RBS Visa Classic account that was taken out on 20/5/98. They say the account defaulted (they did not give a date of default) and was assingned to their client CL Finance on 18/8/06 for full collection.. I do not know of any outstanding balance. Had a card but maxed it out and ripped it up and paid it off as far as I can remember. I have not had it for 10 years at least.

 

Would this be statute barred. I dont understand why they say they got it in 2006 and have not tried to collect until 2012????

 

What do you think I should do now. They have not provided any proof, just a letter with this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update. Got a response to the prove it letter stating that the debt relates to a RBS Visa Classic account that was taken out on 20/5/98. They say the account defaulted (they did not give a date of default) and was assingned to their client CL Finance on 18/8/06 for full collection.. I do not know of any outstanding balance. Had a card but maxed it out and ripped it up and paid it off as far as I can remember. I have not had it for 10 years at least.

 

Would this be statute barred. I dont understand why they say they got it in 2006 and have not tried to collect until 2012????

 

What do you think I should do now. They have not provided any proof, just a letter with this information.

 

 

a default does not give them the right to collect nor reset the sb date.

 

your last payment is the sb clock start

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Got a reply to the cca request today. They acknowledge my letter and respond

 

"Please not that we do not currently hold a copy of the required document on site.

 

Therefore, we are in the process of retrieving a copy for you.

 

We confirm that while your request remains outstanding, enforcement action will not be taken against you.

 

Please not that although the agreement may not be enforceable while your request for a copy of it remains outstanding,

this does not mean that your debt is wiped out.

 

Any outstanding debt is still owed and you must continue to make payments.

 

If you do not make payment then we will be entitled to request payment from you.

 

We may also pass details of any default to a credit reference agency and pass your information to a debt collector.

 

This view is shared by the Office of Fair Trading."

 

This took them a month to send. How long do they have to get the information to me?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

12+2 days!!

 

told ya

 

you should have ignored them

 

cra file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss check your cra file please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...