Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax/Bank of Scotland mortgage problems


mcal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was wondering if someone could advise me as to whether I have a case here:

 

A year and a half ago I took out a mortgage on my current property with Bank of Scotland. At the time I tied myself into a 5 year fixed term which left me liable to an early repayment fee should I leave the mortgage within the first 5 years.

At the start of this year I saw a flat I was interested in buying and walked into my local Bank of Scotland branch. At that time I was informed that if I decided to take out my new mortgage with them then there would be no early repayment fee. They thereafter provided me with a personalised illustration, however they used the Halifax mortgage company for this. I was informed by the mortgage advisor within the branch that this would not affect my early repayment fee.

I thereafter proceeded to put an offer in on the flat which was accepted, I also managed to quickly sell my own flat. This was at the start of Feb. My move in and salke dates were both mid April. On 12th Feb I again went into the Bank of Scotland and officially applied for my new mortgage with them. Again it was all done via the Halifax and again I was promised that I would not have to pay the early repayment fee with the Bank of Scotland.

On 12th March I received a letter from the Bank of Scotland laying out the repayment terms for my current mortgage and lo and behold they wanted £3,039.20 early repayment fee.

I decided to email the mortgage advisor from the Bank of Scotland who was arranging my current mortgage and ask her re this, I receieved this reply from he on March 13th

 

"Dealing with this at present, there seems to be a bit of confusion within the systems as your mortgage presently is on the halifax system although your present rate isn't coming up. This is being sorted and I hope to get back to you tomorrow.

 

Sorry for the delay, I will get this sorted tomorrow hopefully and get back to you asap.

 

Speak to you soon"

 

After hearing nothing from her over the next week I again decided to email to enquire about the delay. On March 21st I received this

 

"Tried calling you at home - thought it better to e-mail you rather than leave a long-winded message.

 

I have been frantically going back and forth to every dept almost to get to the bottom of this. As I said the confusion comes as your mortgage is keyed on the Halifax system but is actually a Bank of Scotland mortgage and wouldn't allow me access to anything surrounding your present fixed rate product. Finally got the answer two minutes ago :-

 

Unfortunately your mortgage has to be rekeyed on to the Bank of Scotland system and this can only be done by that dept. To save you paying the £3k penalty they will have to port your existing fixed rate over for the £75980 with the rest going on to another fixed rate (best available). I personally want to keep your inconvenience down to an absolute minimum and have asked them if I could give them most of your info to be keyed on prior to speaking to you. They can then phone you to complete the rest of the application - as you know to comply with the FSA they have to cover certain things.

 

Can you please give me a best time for them to call you and I will e-mail them with the details. My apologies for this inconvenience to you both and will do my very best to have as much as possible in place prior to their call. "

 

I then waited another 3 days before a member of Bank of Scotland telephoned to arrange my mortgage through them. At that time I was informed that the application would take between 4 and 6 weeks to complete. Bearing in mind that my purchase and sale date was three weeks away at this time I was getting frantic. They promised me that they would prrocess it ASAP. I thereafter provided them with my details to proceed with the mortgage, however I was then informed that they could not provide me with a mortgage based on my current financial position :confused: .

Due to the time restrictions on me I have been left with no option other than to go back to the mortgage advisor and ask her to proceed with my original application which leaves me facing a £3k bill.

 

Sorry for the long winded story. I was just wondering if anyone could advise me as to whether I have a case to fight here?

 

Thanks,

 

Stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...