Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Question regarding Childcare Vouchers and salary deductions / Repayments


WishfulThinker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In Feb 2011 my partner signed up for childcare vouchers - £243 per month.

The vouchers came through to us and we used them, as you do. In Oct they informed him that they had NOT been taking the £243 from his salary for these, so he has £2187 to repay.

 

Now, these deductions come out BEFORE Tax and NI is calculated and deducted, and so you pay less. So, going based on his base salary he paid £631 MORE in tax and NI than he would have if the deductions were taken off. He also took home £1982 more than he would have if they had been taken off.

 

This is calculated on his base salary, as he every month has varying overtime, so nett pay never the same each month.

 

He is now repaying it - £200 per month. But, they are taking salary, adding Overtime then taking off the proper £243 for the voucher calculating Tax and NI and THEN deducting the missed payment as an Advance.

 

Is this correct? As they plan to take the full £2187 as an advance........so he is repaying that amount. However, he really only recieved £1982 more than he should have. And has also paid more Tax and NI than he would have.

 

Surely they have to take the Repayment before Tax and Ni, so that it balances out how much he should have paid?

 

He has spoken to HMRC, but they say that they do not really administrate or have anything to do with Vouchers or how they work so they cannot advise :(. And no one seems to know. I do not really trust my partners Payroll as they have messed up a fair bit - such as taking 70% of his salary as tax one month, then being adamant they were right till We got HMRC to call them and tell them they were wrong.

 

Any advice appreciated. Just so that I know they are doing it right, or if they are not, how should it be done?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be worth contacting ACAS for some advice on this 084547 474747

HMRC are correct that they do not have any envolvement in the administartion of the scheme but the company do have to let them know that they use the scheme so that is why they can't help you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wishful

The Childcare vouchers are exempt from tax and NI up to £55 per week so why are they factoring in the tax and NI????

Can I suggest you look at booklet E18 on HMRC website (just put E18 in search box on website) and check the details that best fit your scenario.

The vouchers are usually dealt with by salary sacrifice which is where you agree to give up an amount of salary equivalent to the cost of the vouchers, this is usually effected by a change to your contract.

HMRC do not give advice because they are the adjudicators in cases of dispute.

Have a read of E18 and then post back here if you've any queries

Regards

Gbarbm

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gbarbm, I had a wee read through and it covered my basic understanding on the vouchers. My query is more what should happen, if the employer has NOT been taking the salary sacrifice from the Employee. And then they require the employee to repay it.

 

They are now taking the £243 as salary sacrifice as normal as we are still receiving the vouchers, but they are then after Tax and NI taking £200 a month as repayment of an 'advance'. They want him to repay the full £2187 that should have been taken by salary sacrifice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask more questions, just trying to get my head around what happened.

So they gave your partner the vouchers but did not deduct them from the gross pay. So that means in those months he received his normal gross pay?

So the tax/NI deducted was based on normal gross pay during that period... Is my understanding correct?

Sorry if I seem a bit thick...just making sure I understand exactly what happened

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask more questions, just trying to get my head around what happened.

So they gave your partner the vouchers but did not deduct them from the gross pay. So that means in those months he received his normal gross pay?

So the tax/NI deducted was based on normal gross pay during that period... Is my understanding correct?

Sorry if I seem a bit thick...just making sure I understand exactly what happened

 

No that is 100% correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, good... The mists are clearing. ;-)

Right then,

1) the salary sacrifice (equivalent to the cost of the tax/NI exempt voucher of £243 per month) reduces the gross pay by the same amount

2) tax and NI is then deducted from the true gross pay ( gross pay less voucher cost)

3) the amount of tax/NI due and payable will be less than normal gross pay because it has of course been reduced by the salary sacrifice

That's what should have happened

What did happen was;

4) the normal gross pay was paid ... Let's say £2000 for example the vouchers were paid (£243) so the taxable amount would have been £2423 less free pay (code 747L equates to £7479 per annum divided by 12 = £623

£2423 - £623 = £1800 which would be liable to tax/NI

5) however, it should have been £2000 less £243 = £1757 - £623 = £1134 taxable

So you can see that the tax liability will obviously be less not more

I think payroll should be offsetting the difference between the two amounts as an in year adjustment.

Is this an in house or outsourced payroll do you know?

The reason I ask is if it is outsourced, your partner may get a better response if he speaks to them rather than Doris in wages if you know what I mean.

I hope I haven't confused you too much; it's not the easiest of subjects to explain!

Regards

Gbarbm

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. I 'think' I understand it.

 

It is an Outsourced Payroll - makes it very difficult to get hold of anyone and they make numerous mistakes as it is! His HR dept had asked for the whole thing repaid in TWO payments and he told them to shove it!

 

I have asked him to get hold of all his payslips from Feb - Oct 2011, so I can use one of the salary calcs to see what the exact figures are.

 

I may just be over thinking it all, I just REALLY do not want to be hit with a tax demand etc in April , or him pay back more than he should (his employers do NOT deserve it!! haha) so trying to get this all clear

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he gets all his payslips he can use the checker on HMRC website (see below) then once armed with the figures, he can write to HR/wages section and see what their response is.

 

 

Income Tax - quick check calculator

If you're aged under 65, a basic or higher rate taxpayer - 20 or 40 per cent - and you get the basic Personal Allowance, you can use HMRC’s simple tax checker. It'll help you to find out if you're paying about the right amount of tax.

You'll need to have ready details of:

your total earnings for the tax year before tax was taken off

the total tax you paid on your earnings

the amount of interest you had from bank and building society savings after tax was taken off

the total tax you paid on bank and building society savings

the total amount of any Gift Aid donations you've made

The tax checker will only give you an estimate. You might get other types of income, allowances or benefits that affect the amount of tax you end up paying.

Go to tax checker

Get basic information about Income Tax

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...