Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Royalties Gold Account Unfair Charges Refunded


ch114275
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Over the last 12 months I have had a total of £1008 worth of charges refunded by RBS along with compensation for the distress that this has caused me. I have also forced them to amend my credit file with all the major agencies in order to reflect the true picture of my finances, as they were reporting my "overdraft" to them.

 

In August of 2011 I visited my branch in order to amend my address. At the time I had a Select Silver account with the bank which I had hardly used on a regular basis. I was persuaded to upgrade this to a Royalties Gold account, as the benefits of this account were more suited to my needs. The RBS failed to update my address properly and I did not receive any correspondence from them at all for a number of weeks. When I queried this again I was told that my address held on file by the bank was my actual branch address and that I would need to visit my branch again to amend my address. I did this on a further two occasions in December and January until I finally managed to get my address changed.

 

I had happily paid the £12.95 monthly fee but forgot to transfer money into the account in September to cover this monthly charge.

 

This made my account overdrawn by £8.13 and I was charged at a daily rate of £6 for this unauthorised overdraft. As I hadn't received any notification of these charges and was not an online banking customer, I was unaware that a debt of £968 had built up because of these daily charges.

 

I contacted EQUIFAX to request access to my credit file, which is another benefit of the account package, I was basically accused of fraud because I had my address down as my branch address. They refused to deal with me any further until I had completed their identity verification procedure, which I duly did. It was only then that I saw the RBS had reported this debt to them and by registering my address as their branch they had caused a CIFAS flag to be placed on my credit file. I contacted and raised a complaint about this with them, which was resolved almost immediately and with minimal effort on my part. However, I was still left with a debt of almost a thousand pounds through no real fault of my own.

 

I then received a flurry of letters and telephone calls from RBS demanding that I pay these charges or they would refer my account to a debt collection agency. My account had already been passed to their collections team in Birmingham who had put a stop on my debit card and cancelled my cheque book without even contacting me, even though they had my mobile phone number on record throughout this whole period. I contacted RBS again as soon as the first letter arrived and spoke to a very apologetic advisor who agreed that it seemed a little unfair that this level of charges had been applied to the account through no fault of my own. He then offered to reduce the amount to £480 as a "gesture of goodwill". I refused to accept this and raised a complaint with the customer service team.

 

I waited over a week then called again, as I had received no reply to my complaint. I spoke again to the collections team and reminded them that they have a duty to treat their customers fairly under BCOBS. I stated clearly that there was nothing in the terms and conditions that I had agreed to which allowed them to treat their own charges as unauthorised borrowing and by doing so they were being unfair in their favour by allowing a debt of £968 to build up. I put all of this in writing to them and received a phone call within 3 days saying that they would be refunding the total amount of charges along with a payment of £40 as compensation for their error, re-instating my debit card facility and sending a new cheque book out in the post.

 

However, to date despite 12 requests and 3 complaints I am still to receive my Royalties Gold welcome pack, detailing my membership benefits in full but I suppose this is a minor issue in relation to the issue I have described above.

 

I feel personally that this is nothing short of attempted theft by RBS and am sure that many unwitting customers have simply accepted the charges and paid up in full to clear their debt and credit file. I also feel that this is extremely poor administration by RBS over a simple issue that they could have resolved quite easily. I believe that they tried to take advantage of the situation on my account and acted irresponsibly by allowing such a debt to build up without contacting me.

 

I would urge other users to fight this issue vigorously to stop this bank from using their customers to recoup their losses or shore up their £2bn in profits!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations and well done on your tenacity.

 

Yes, the stories which we hear all suggest that RBS is a shocking bank and along with NatWest they are probably the two poorly run and unfair banks in the whole pile. A great shame when you think that they are owned by us.

 

They seem to have acquired the nationalised industry mentality very quickly.

 

I am very pleased that the BCOBS arguments seem to have worked but what a shame that anyone should have to take this trouble simply to get the service which you are paying for. Sir Stephen Hester is already getting a huge amount of money for managing the bank. It is a shame that it seems that his customers have to help out with the management as well - and for free.

 

I completely agree that people should avoid this bank and find somewhere else to take their banking business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...