Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work Programme query


elfieb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Been on the Work Programme since Dec last year with G4S......not had any problems thus fair, infact they have been very helpful.

 

Recieved an email today of an appointment they have made for me to register with a recruitment agency. In the first place, I absolutely loathe agencies, as have signed up with so many of the past year, and heard absolutely nothing....infact I have already registered with the one G4S have made an appointment with....

 

I dont want to register again, so can I refuse to go, or will this be seen as refusing a job, even though there is no job (purely a speculative visit)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them you have already registered, This is not Refusal of Employment but Work Programme sanctions are broadly about being open to the training provider's support. I don't think it would be reasonable for them to take action because you refuse to sign up with an agency you are already signed up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The people at the Jobcentre are like a pack of Hyenas just waiting for the weakest of the claimants to stumble, and they'll be on you in a flash.

 

Do as they ask and give them no excuse for suspending your benefit.

 

What makes perfect sense to you and I, makes none to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The people at the Jobcentre are like a pack of Hyenas just waiting for the weakest of the claimants to stumble, and they'll be on you in a flash.

 

Do as they ask and give them no excuse for suspending your benefit.

 

What makes perfect sense to you and I, makes none to them.

 

We have current and former JCP staff on this forum (include me in the "former" category) who advise people on a wide range of benefit issues. They do this in their free time for no pay.

 

Posts like this are not helpful.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have current and former JCP staff on this forum (include me in the "former" category) who advise people on a wide range of benefit issues. They do this in their free time for no pay.

 

Posts like this are not helpful.

 

I agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh frankie_begbie you really are a charmer!

So I am a hyena in your opinion? Thank you for that lovely description.

 

elfieb if you are regiastered with the agency in question then all I can suggest is that you notify your WP adviser of this as long as you are still in regular contact with them then there will be no point in attending an interview to register it will be a waste of both yours and the recruitment agency, however if you haven't been in contact recently (usually about 3 months) they can remove you from the contact list and then yes I would recommend that you attend to ensure that you do not find yourself being referred to the DMA team by the WP providers for a potentiasl sanction on your claim.

 

Perhaps it may also be worth noting frankie_begbie that when you are referred to the Work Programme providers any sanctions imposed on the claim are referred by the WP not JCP as you do not see a JCP adviser again until you finish the WP placement after 102 week. Yet again someone who posts things without having all the facts, if the JCP staff believe that there is a problem with your job search or doubt on availability actively seeking etc then a referral is made to the WP providers for them to bring up the issues at your next meeting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh frankie_begbie you really are a charmer!

So I am a hyena in your opinion? Thank you for that lovely description.

 

elfieb if you are regiastered with the agency in question then all I can suggest is that you notify your WP adviser of this as long as you are still in regular contact with them then there will be no point in attending an interview to register it will be a waste of both yours and the recruitment agency, however if you haven't been in contact recently (usually about 3 months) they can remove you from the contact list and then yes I would recommend that you attend to ensure that you do not find yourself being referred to the DMA team by the WP providers for a potentiasl sanction on your claim.

 

Perhaps it may also be worth noting frankie_begbie that when you are referred to the Work Programme providers any sanctions imposed on the claim are referred by the WP not JCP as you do not see a JCP adviser again until you finish the WP placement after 102 week. Yet again someone who posts things without having all the facts, if the JCP staff believe that there is a problem with your job search or doubt on availability actively seeking etc then a referral is made to the WP providers for them to bring up the issues at your next meeting.

 

Exactly what I told him. Take no chances with them.

 

I had my benefit suspended for almost 6 months for not applying for a job that was out of town, working for less money and would have meant me actually losing money when I had the chance of another job on my doorstep, and for more money.

Instead of the Advisor being reasonable and seeing my point of view about the money, he reported it to the Decision Maker.

 

He later told me he was just a monkey following orders.

 

I learned my lesson after that. Tell them nothing if you can avoid it, you could be making a big mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had my benefit suspended for almost 6 months for not applying for a job that was out of town, working for less money and would have meant me actually losing money when I had the chance of another job on my doorstep, and for more money"

 

hope you managed to get that job then

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Picture the scene: we're in a quaint old pub, with a roaring fire. At the end of the bar, a large brass bell is attached to the wall. It's late - the barman ambles over to the bell, and pulls on the little piece of rope attached. We hear a couple of clangs, and the barman calls out: "Civility, gentlemen, please!"

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, the original question has been answered. I don't see any good outcome if this thread continues, so I'm going to close it.

 

ElfieB, if you need more advice on this, please click the black "!" triangle at the bottom of this post to contact the Site Team and we'll reopen it for you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...