Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paulk67 V Rbos""


paulk67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone,

just received my bundle of statements looked through them and what have i found,only 3 months worth of statements belonging to someone else.Should i phone them to let them know there mistake or just bin them.Anyways added up total of charges over 6 years and wow over £4000.Sending in my letter for request for repayment of charges so here goes! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck Paul, not that you'll need it! And keep your thread up to date so we can all follow your progress.

 

Stace xx

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi to everyone,received a reply from a Tommy Mclean,customer services manager.can anyone tell me if this a standard letter.

 

we believe that our charges are fair,reasonable and transparent.we consider that our amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff,wich we are satisfied,complies with all applicable laws and regulations.we are also committed to ensuring the transparancy of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

we have considered and responded to the office of fair tradings statement of 5th april 2006.we do not accept the office of fair tradings findings in relation to credit card fees.we are concerned that the office of fair trading has publicly called into question the setting of charges applied to other products.including current accounts.the office of fair trading has restricted its investigation to credit cards and made no attempt to consult with the RBS or the industry in relation to other,entirely different products.

consequently,against that background,we must differ with the views expressed in your letter and will not be refunding any of the charges applied to you bank account.

is this a new one,and should i move onto the next stage

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi,been away for a few weeks and in the mean time received a reply to my Lba,it was the exact same response to my prem approach,is this normal also i think i made a mistake in my Lba,i included interested charges, will this make a difference if i file a court claim,also one more thing,the letters i have been sending are to edingburgh what address can i put down on the moneyclaim site as i am in england

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,been away for a few weeks and in the mean time received a reply to my Lba,it was the exact same response to my prem approach,is this normal also i think i made a mistake in my Lba,i included interested charges, will this make a difference if i file a court claim

 

No, not really - they've had enough time now. Time to litigate my friend!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look in the bank temps library.

Paste the claims parics from there onto your online form.

Make sure you fill in the acc details.

Send the charges schedule by seperate cover by post.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone,can anyone help me,last time i had any correspondence from rbs was november,i havent filed a claim with money claim yet but was going to do so(hadnt the money to pay costs)in my letters to rbs i am claiming for six years from sept 2006,will i have to update this when i set of proccedings with money claim(ie:feb 2007)or will sept 2006 be ok

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...