Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is kind of related but does anyone know since I have this ban from entering UAE because of my loan, can I visit Qatar? 
    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hard Drives failed, little support


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4378 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Community

 

I purchased 5 x Western Digital (WD) hard drives, and I assumed that the manufacturers guarantee/warranty applied (the retailer, before purchase they never made me aware that there were support differences or exclusions when buying the product.)

 

One hard drive failed after being installed for 10 months, I unpacked 2 unused backup hard drives bought in the same batch and tried to replace the faulty hard drive only to find that they were both faulty.

I then Identified that WD had a batch of faulty drives which were manufactured in the same period as my drives.

 

I contacted the retailers support immediately and just before 1 year had expired, they agreed to replace the hard drives in a 2 stage operation to avoid data loss.

 

After sending 2 x drives the retailer wrote to me explaining to me that they could only refund me part of the cost of the drives. I then complained in writing. They say that 6 months has passed.

 

Recap: One drive failed at the 10 month point, the drive is innactive much of the time because of power saving function.

Two Drives never functioned without error, I do not have extra equipment to test them, and they were bought as back up drives.

 

Could you please advise me regards to this situation, it seems as though the retailers terms and conditions are heavily in favour of the retailer. I found out later that hard drives with and without manufacturers support are sold and described equally. The retailers support firstly asked me to contact Western Digital RMA to resolve the issue, WD offered no support, it seems as though the retailer do not hold accessible records with regards to who is responsible for support, they find out when WD offer no support.

 

This seems crazy, how can a consumer be expected to guess what type of support is available before purchase?

 

Thanks Illy

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE: reversed burden of proof

 

I have sent the retailer links from the Western Digital forum and others, identifying the problem with this hard drive which coincides with the manufacture date. This should be proof that there was a problem when I received the drives.

I could not test the hard drives until now though, I had no hard drive slots available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If you had checked the drives within the first 6 months then you would have more rights than you do now. After 6 months, it is down to the buyer to ascertain they are faulty through manufacture. The fact that you didn't unpack them until after the 6 month mark is not the sellers fault and as such, they can offer a partial refund because even though you haven't used them, you have had them for this amount of time and if this went to court or you asked Trading standards, they will say that you have had 'enjoyment' of the product.

 

Just my opinion of course

  • Confused 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its a known and manufacturer acknowledged fault at birth

they should be replaced with new

 

it this instance, having done it myself with drives in my 'my webbook ' device too

 

just contact WD with the series numbers

they will post out new drives FOC.

see their website or the alert emails they put out.

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone.

 

WD normally offers 3 years warranty on their hard drives.

With this purchase, I have only just found out that the Western Digital site reports that I have : "No Limited Warranty - Product was originally sold to a system manufacturer. Please contact the system manufacturer or the place of purchase for warranty service."

 

I was unaware of this at the time of purchase.

 

the retailers terms and conditions state:

Where we are not the manufacturer of the Products, we will endeavour to transfer to you the benefit of any warranty or guarantee given to us in relation to the Products.

 

How can a company expect me to enter a warranty lottery, the customer is not to know if or if not a manufacturers warranty exists until the products have been purchased. This can surely not be correct, they must have an obligation to tell a customer if the warranty differs from the manufacturer before purchase, or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok then back to SOGA then

 

its a acked manu fault

it should be replaced FOC by the retailer

they then seek refund from WD.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Illy

 

Your first port of call is the retailer, who did you pay your monies to?

 

• It is the seller, not the manufacturer, who is responsible if goods do not conform to contract.

 

Provide the proof to the Retailer.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for their help,

 

I feel so empowered understanding that I do indeed have manufacturers warranty, it is simply up to Ebuyer to stop messing me around.

I am also a little less confused about how the law sees this transaction and resulting problems.

 

Once again,

 

Thank you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

DSR plays a part here to

but you might be out of time on that now?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have made some sort of headway.

Ebuyer ignored my prompt rejection of a partial refund as a solution.

 

I requested that they return the hard drives to my possession.. I then received a prompt mail stating that they will endeavour to locate the hard drives, but the hard drives may no longer be in their possession.

On the other hand, I contacted Western Digital support by telephone this time and I was pleasantly surprised. They were aware of problems with Ebuyer support, and they offered me replacement refurbished hard drives because they had 2 years warranty.

 

All I need to do is wait for Ebuyer to return my hardware, then I can return them through their RMA process and receive working drives.

I really would not have gotten this far without all your help!

Make up your own mind about the support I received from this retailer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

glad to point you in the right direct

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad news Guys

 

Ebuyer cannot return my hard drives; they have sent them to another company.

 

I did refuse their offer of a partial refund, and told them I will be contacting Western Digital (the hard drive manufacturer about the problems).

Apparently I took too long to come back with Western Digital~s reply!

 

I have contacted the Western Digital support staff member again, the one who was going to replace my hard drives, and the one who knew about all the problems with the supplier.

 

Has anyone any more suggestions?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad news Guys

 

Ebuyer cannot return my hard drives; they have sent them to another company.

 

I did refuse their offer of a partial refund, and told them I will be contacting Western Digital (the hard drive manufacturer about the problems).

Apparently I took too long to come back with Western Digital~s reply!

 

I have contacted the Western Digital support staff member again, the one who was going to replace my hard drives, and the one who knew about all the problems with the supplier.

 

Has anyone any more suggestions?

 

Thanks

 

eBuyer, in essence, have lost your property then (as you've declined a partial refund). Have they paid any monies to you?

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 . RMA correspondence

2. Telephone conversation to technical support, this is where we arranged to replace two drives first, then send the remaining drive once I received the two new ones.

3. Once they received my 2 drives I received this email

"Following extensive tests by our Returns staff, this item was found to be faulty. Therefore a refund will be issued once the RMA has been closed.

As per section 9.2 of our terms and conditions and in line with the Sale of Goods Act 1979, as this item is over 6 months old you will only qualify for a proportionate refund of the original purchase price. Therefore we are unable to issue a replacement as initially requested."

4. I replied to this email and sent an eNote (just in case )refusing to accept the refund, asking them to honour the manufacturers warranty.

 

5. I have not detected any refund on my personal account. I am not sure how I paid for the hard drives I could have used someone else's account.

They didn@t ask me for my bank account, so I just thought that Ebuyer were still processing my complaint and refusal to accept a partial refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just had an email back from Western Digital (WD) RE: the 2 x hard drive replacement for the drives lost at Ebuyer.

 

WD cannot give me new drives without the old drives.

 

My CAB is open in the morning, is it worth goint there for some face to face advice?

Edited by Illy
Link to post
Share on other sites

get the name of the other company then

or ask ebuyer to contact them and for them to contact WD

giving ref no. XXXXXXX

 

its only a case of X getting to speak to Y.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

I wish I had been able to think outside the box,

 

I have asked them to action the above idea, fingers crossed and thank you for the suggestion.

I also notified the that if they transferred any money, then I have not received it or I have no access to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ebuyer responded:

 

"I have spoke to the appropriate people and these drives have been sent to be destroyed to protect any data of yours that they may contain to be destroyed. This a is done in compliance with the data protection act. We are unable to disclose any information about this company.

 

In regards to the partial refund this was the best resolution we could provide in this situation."

 

It looks like I have 2 less hard drives now, by the looks of things, Ebuyer has transferred some money to the account used to buy the goods (not my account).

I will have to wait some months until the person comes back, they are not willing to take back the money which I have refused as a solution to the problem.

They just ain't bothered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send that to wd

 

make it clear that you did not authorise the distruction nor the partial refund

but both of these were done without your knowledge or involvement.

 

as they have been distroyed beyond yourcontrol

where do you stand regarding the wd replacement warranty

 

i hope all this is in email and not via the phone.

 

there are still other routes of recourse

but lets see if sese prevails

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk,

 

I have just sent WD this information. Thank goodness only one person is responsible for dealing with the incident at WD.

 

The only thing I do not have in writing, is the support call to Ebuyer Tech Support regarding further processing of the RMA.

This is where the tech guy told me that the hard drives were confirmes as defective and to send the 2 drives to Ebuyer, wait for replacements and then send the remaining drive at my own cost when the replacements arrive.

 

I really appreciate this guys!

Without this help I would have certainly started to feel ill and helpless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good news moving fwd then

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a little update.

 

Western Digital have agreed to replace 2 Hard Drives, I only have to send them one drive back.

I am still awaiting for the RMA to go through though.

 

With Regards to Ebuyer, I mailed them yesterday after not being able to identify any part-refund, I was just trying to find out which account money was paid to.

Ebuyer then told me that no refund had been issued, they then processed a refund, there and then.

This meant they destroyed my drives without compensation up to today.

They deducted approx £11.00 per drive which I can live with.

I guess I can reolace one drive with the refunded money, when WD actions the RMA on my side, I should have been able to replace all 3 drives with no significant loss to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey at last

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...