Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rockwell/A&L Loan


Halibutt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a CCA request to Rockwell four months ago. No response at all, though no further attempts at chasing the alleged debt have been made - by telephone or in writing.

 

Either they're dragging their heels in the hope of eventually obtaining something or they simply don't have a valid CCA.

 

I haven't yet sent the Account In Dispute letter, although, by the lack of response, it can be assumed the account is in dispute.

 

Is it advisable to send the In Dispute letter or just let it lie and see what happens? If I send a letter, it might wake them up and initiate continued action, but my feeling is that I should send the letter, because they'll probably pass the account on and I'd like to be able to tell any future DCAs to just return the account to Rockwell as it's officially in dispute.

 

Any thoughts welcome and thanks.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to send the A/C in dispute letter although it does no harm to do so. If another DCA happens to turn up, you can send them packing anyway.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Silverfox. When I get my next benefit payment, I'll be able to afford to send the In Dispute letter - I think crossing the Ts and dotting the Is would be a good idea. In the meantime, food is a priority! :sad:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Silverfox. When I get my next benefit payment, I'll be able to afford to send the In Dispute letter - I think crossing the Ts and dotting the Is would be a good idea. In the meantime, food is a priority! :sad:

 

If you want, you could just get a certificate of posting from the Post Office (free) Saves on the cost of RD

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you want to know that it was delliverd but if it came down to your word against theirs(in any complaint)proof of posting is sufficient

 

Do Rockwell have an email address?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so, but I'm a bit old fashioned and like to keep a paper trail. After four months, another week or so won't hurt. The main thing is that I don't want to unnecessarily kick the hornets' nest, but I want to make sure everything is exactly right. I'm fully prepared to go to court if any of these idiots want to take it that far...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you want to know that it was delliverd but if it came down to your word against theirs(in any complaint)proof of posting is sufficient

 

Do Rockwell have an email address?

 

Hi Silv

 

Ouch Proof of posting??? once in the Royal Mail system it is deemed to be delivered and duly recieved, however I have just recently fought of an angry bailiff re distress warrant for unpaid fine to which I knew nothing of the offence, I had to make a stat dec to save me from £700 fee + 6 points. the case I hope is going to be re-opened.

 

My neighbour told me he got a letter for me but opened it in error but was embarrased to tell me, so moral of the Proof of post is do it recorded.

 

Mr W

Edited by Mr Worried
sp

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

In July 2010, I sent a CCA request, accompanied by a postal order for the statutory £1 fee to "Rockwell" for an amount they alledge is outstanding on an unsecured Alliance & Leicester loan from 1999. Last acknowledged in writing in March 2010.

 

To date, I've had nothing whatsoever back from them. I did consider sending the "Account in dispute" letter, but thought that this might just serve as a reminder and essentially be kicking the hornet's nest.

 

My thought is that I should continue to do nothing, rather than contacting them in writing again.

 

However, I have a strong feeling that the account will be passed on to another DCA in the next few months and letter ping-pong may resume.

 

Simple question is:

 

If a new DCA starts chasing, can I state that the account is in dispute with Rockwell and should be returned to them, or do I have to have sent the In dispute letter to Rockwell first?

 

I consider the account in dispute due to lack of valid CCA, disproportionate charges, interest (after being told in writing that interest would cease) and harassment by telephone at the time (around 10 calls a day).

 

Thanks for any advice.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but it was sold to Rockwell, who were then sent a CCA request - not the original lender. I'd been paying the OC.

 

So Rockwell are responsible for sending the requested paperwork or obtaining it from the OC. If they fail in this duty, the dispute is with Rockwell, so surely while the dispute exists, they shouldn't re-sell the account?

 

Thanks for your input DonkeyB :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Rockwell are responsible for complying with the CCA request. They cannot enforce while in default. Better to refer to them as the debt buyer or creditor, rather than as a DCA.

 

Did you receive a Notice of Assignment when the account was sold? When was it sold?

 

Did you continue to pay the OC after it had been sold? Are you still paying?

 

You are leaking extra bits of info which would have been useful at the start!

 

You should certainly send the account in dispute letter.

 

And you should be reclaiming PPI and any other unfair charges.

 

And yes, they can sell it even if there is a dispute, though the practice is frowned upon by the OFT. But you must put your disputes in writing.

 

Alternatively you could ignore, as Rockwell are notoriously useless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DonkeyB. Well, as I don't yet have a CCA and haven't sent a SAR, I'm not totally sure of additional charge/interest amounts. Sorry, didn't mean to just slowly leak info LOL

 

Recieved NOA from original creditor (I'd have to look up sale date) stopped paying Rockwell 12 + 2 days after CCA request was sent. Haven't heard anything since. Maybe a SAR would make sense for reclaiming charges?

 

Rockwell DO seem to be even more useless than companies like Lowell, but if the concensus is to send the in dispute letter, that's what I'll be doing first thing on Monday. Thanks for your help, much appreciated. :)

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do this debt show on your cra file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No payment arrangement with Rockwell. Phone calls, letters as usual. I've read several times on CAG that it's "reasonable" to withold payments while an account is indispute. I'd previously informed them of inability to pay and offered £1 a month but that was ignored and phone calls continued until I sent the appropriate template.

 

Thanks for your help everyone. I'm going to have a busy next couple of days! :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read several times on CAG that it's "reasonable" to withold payments while an account is indispute.

 

That was bad advice, IMO! It only really holds when the PPI and unfair charges would outweigh the claimed balance due. But if there’s no arrangement in place, it’s a moot point.

 

It’s good that you’ve made an offer, and bad for them to ignore you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well, I've finally got a reply from Rockwell regarding my CCA request and the subsequent "In Dispute" letter.

 

Here it is, word for word...

 

Dear Sir,

 

Any future queries relating to this account should be directed to (the OC).

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Collections Manager

 

I note they can't even get the dear Sir/yours sincerely/faithfully right LOL

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...