Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax (Ashford BC, Kent) & Chandlers - not playing fair? HELP PLEASE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4511 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, more of my woes I'm afraid.

Just as a bit of background: My business started going belly up early 2011. In March I had to cancel all d/d's & s/o's cos I had nothing to pay any anyone with. Ashford Borough Council was one of them.

In April i got a regular job & made a one-off payment £150 (i think) against my council tax. I had planned to keep paying them but just couldn't afford it with all the other bills & business costs.

In May ABC sent a letter to the effect that they were going to court for my arrears. I phoned them & was told to do nothing as the court would contact me regarding a payment plan.

 

I heard nothing until a Bailiff from Chandlers turned up at my house one evening just as I was returning from a week working away. He presented me with his Bailiff Notice - A Liability Order from the Mag court for Coucil Tax - £992, Stautory Fee - £24.50. Total - £1016.50. He told me that I MUST agree to a payment plan THAT DAY, & I MUST pay a £25 deposit by debit/credit card or cash. I told him I didn't have £25, or any working cards, or anyway to get any cash outside banking hours. He refused a cheque and asked if I could borrow the money. I sent him away for a couple of hours and managed to borrow some money from my lodger (who took it from her float from work)

Now, I know it was stupid, but I was dead on my feet, hungry, needed a bath & dinner & to get some sleep before going away agin at 5am next day ...... So when the guy came back around 8.30pm and said he needed to come in to fill in the payment plan, I let him in (like i said - stupid).

So he filled in his form - which turned out to be a Notice of Distress & Inventory & Walking Possession Agreement - listing every bit of furniture in my living room (the house is rented- part furnished). Now with additional fees - Levy £54.00, Walking Possession Fee £12.00 - new Total £1082.50. The payment plan is set at £178 pcm on the 1st of each, for next 6 months because "that's the maximum term the council will accept". I told him I didn't understand most of the terminology & didn't agree with the bits I did understand, but he said it didn't matter, it's the standar form & I should just sign it.

 

 

Having been here a few days now I realise that a lot of the above is wrong but is it illegal/unlawful ?

My lodger was present for some of the time & will witness if required.

The main problem is that I can't afford £178 pcm - if I could I would have paid the council direct - at the moment £40 pcm would be pushing it. Do I have any grounds to get the payment reduced, based on the lies & deceipt & general bullcrap I was fed ( & the fact that I was barely conscious at the time) ????

 

Please advise (oh, and sorry this is so long-winded)

TIA

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the bailiff entered you property at all? If not, then make sure they never do.

 

 

(requoted)

...... So when the guy came back around 8.30pm and said he needed to come in to fill in the payment plan, I let him in (like i said - stupid).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible you can list the goods exactly as described on the Notice of Seizure? Have you confirmed with the Council the amount outstanding?

 

PT

 

Hi PT, - thanks for your response. list as follows

 

"1 x sanyo tv silver

1 x darkwood coffee table

2 x brown leather sofas

1 x darkwood tv cabinet

1 x darkwood book shelf "

For some reason he's drawn a box around the last 4 items.

 

I did tell the guy at the time that none of the things on his list were mine - he said it didn't matter. Can I argue that as the house is rented part furnished these items belong to the landlord ( I don't have anything in writing to back this up - I rent from a family member )

 

 

I haven't double checked with the council & can't put my hands on the last correspondance right now but £992 sounds right ( total bill was under £1100 & I know I paid them either 150 or 200 direct). So if they've misquoted the outstanding amount to the council would it make their action null & void?

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT, - thanks for your response. list as follows

 

"1 x sanyo tv silver

1 x darkwood coffee table

2 x brown leather sofas

1 x darkwood tv cabinet

1 x darkwood book shelf "

For some reason he's drawn a box around the last 4 items.

 

I did tell the guy at the time that none of the things on his list were mine - he said it didn't matter. Can I argue that as the house is rented part furnished these items belong to the landlord ( I don't have anything in writing to back this up - I rent from a family member ) OK your family member needs to lay claim to the goods as a 3rd Party claim - if not then they could actually remove them - the simplest way to do this is via a Statutory Declaration similar to that below, cost is £5/£10 at any Solicitor but advisable to get at least 3 notarised copies:

 

STATUTORY DECLARATION

 

I,____________________________ ______________

 

address_________________________________________________

 

_______________________________________________________

 

make the following declaration under the Statutory Declarations Act 1835:

 

All items contained within the property at the above address and within it's boundaries, are owned by Mr XXX XXXX & Mrs XXX XXXX . There are no items within the property or it's boundaries belonging to any other person.

 

I understand that a person who intentionally makes a false statement in a statutory declaration is guilty of an offence under section 11 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835, and I believe that the statements in this declaration are true in every particular.

 

Signed:

 

 

Declared at___________________on__________________of 20___

Before me,

 

 

Full Name___________________________Qualification____________

 

 

Address__________________________________________________

of person before whom the declaration is made (in printed letters)

 

I haven't double checked with the council & can't put my hands on the last correspondance right now but £992 sounds right ( total bill was under £1100 & I know I paid them either 150 or 200 direct). So if they've misquoted the outstanding amount to the council would it make their action null & void? No

 

G

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks - I'll try to get that done asap.

Just out of curiosity .... If I missed a payment etc & the bailiffs came knocking again,

1) can they take anything in the house or just what is listed (above) on their paperwork?

2) they've listed 2 sofas - they're quite big, so the only way to get them out of the house in 1 piece would be to remove the front window - can they do that ? or can I have them for criminal damage if they attempt it ? or would they employ a window fitter at my expense to remove/replace the window ?

 

(these bugggers really get your mind working don't they)

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off they have to get back in and there is nothing that says you have to do this. He may huff & puff but he has a set course of action he must follow and the chances are he will fail - worry about that if it comes to it though.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...