Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi anyone and all who who reads this,

 

I was hoping for advice in Claims made against the consumer... heres the story.

 

My Girfriend and i were staying at a Travelodge earlier in the month. She only recieved a letter through the door yesterday which was a 'Notice of Claim' from a third party company called CRS (Civil recovery solutions) of £150 for allegedly smoking in one of their rooms.

 

First off me and my gf are smokers but were certainly not smoking in the room. Travelodge have not been in touch full stop. only the third party. so there is no claims of evidence or anything, just details of how to pay this Claim value of 150 pounds for specialist cleaning and the loss of rental opportunity etc etc.

 

Having recieved the letter late i find myself not much time to deal with this. The letter states that ' If this claim is not settled within 14 days of this notice we will have no alternative but to refer this matter back to our client with a recommendation to consider issuing court proceedings' And we are on day 8 now. should i worry, what will happen when the 14 days expire?

 

Any help or advice would be more than appreciated,

 

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have seen similar reports of this on other forums recently. This very poor behaviour by Travelodge.

 

The company should have sent a letter directly to you with the claim that you smoked in the room and not handed it straight to CRS to pursue in this aggressive way. I suspect that Travelodge have probably given CRS the wrong room number as seems to be the case on the other complaints.

I would contact travelodge and demand to know why they have passed this to CRS without first contacting you about the alleged offence.

 

Let them refer this matter back to our client if their is no case to answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like another type of RLP spoofers

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks i intend to phone them in the morning i will definately keep you posted as to what their response is.

 

Yeah i read other responses on this matter with travelodge taking the fine directly off of a credit card which the consumer then has to claim back. Could not find anything relating to third party threats or intentions of pursuing a fine so just making sure i take this on from the right angle.

 

will update...

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like another type of RLP spoofers

 

dx

 

CRS is the new name for RLP as far as I can see

 

The new company is being chaired by Prof. Joshua Bamfield, who was the founder of Civil Recovery in the UK back in the 90's and the chap who started RLP Ltd in the first place.

They claim they are going to be more aggresive in pursuing claims through the courts and offer a more bespoke service than RLP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sequenci, So if i were to ignore the 'notice', it's not like they can come chasing for money, there would be more letters etc until i replied?

 

i know its naive of me to think after the 14th day i'm screwed but i really have no experience in matters such as this regarding the law and rights etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks i intend to phone them in the morning i will definately keep you posted as to what their response is.

 

Yeah i read other responses on this matter with travelodge taking the fine directly off of a credit card which the consumer then has to claim back. Could not find anything relating to third party threats or intentions of pursuing a fine so just making sure i take this on from the right angle.

 

will update...

 

Just be clear this is not a FINE

its a speculative invoice

with no legal status

 

a fine is a crimial matter as has been pointed out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to add a little more information – even if it was taken to court (which is most unlikely) they would have to prove that you had been smoking in the room. They would also have to prove that the money that they want from you represents the expenses to which they have been put as a result of the breach of the rules.

 

I would strenuously recommend that you do not telephone them under any circumstances. If you want to reply to them then do it in writing.

 

As you have not been contacted by the hotel, I would suggest that you don't contact anybody. If the contact from the civil recovery people is the first contact you have then this amounts to bullying as far as I'm concerned at it and you should ignore it. You have no legal relationship with the recovery people. Travel lodge know where you are and they can contact you if they want.

 

Do not get worried or het up about this. It is all pretty meaningless. There is a so-called "civil recovery" industry which is trying to emerge and which intends to make its money by putting the frighteners on ordinary people who either have made some simple mistake in their lives or maybe have not even made any mistake at all. This "industry" relies on the fact that most people are decent, don't want any trouble, don't know the law, don't know their rights and don't have the confidence to fight their corner in an effective way.

 

DO NOT TELEPHONE THEM. - it is the same as showing them the whites of your eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, wish i noticed that post before i called them. But it was very informal i only asked details about the claim and the manager for the specific hotel seemed rather clueless. The basis of the claim was ash on the windowsill and a smell of smoke in the room. that was practically all that was said and hopefully there will be no record taken that i was in contact. I think ignoring it will be the answer and see what correspondance they come with next.Hopefully will give me a chance to get clue'd up on the situation so i have an answer if/wehn they persue the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've read about this problem with Travelodge their evidence nearly always seems to be ash on a windowsill and a smell of smoke within a room.

 

Stick with the advice given here and ignore these letters until such time as you receive genuine papers from a court - and, if that were to happen, you will get plenty of help from the knowledgeable people round here!!

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Hopefully you will notice this reply. i have had further correspondance from CRS regarding their initial claim.

 

The basics of the letter, what i read from it were this.

 

1. Because i did not reply to the initial letter, therefor i do NOT intend to deny liability.

 

2. if i do not respond to discuss this case then then our client will have no option but to issue proceedings. seek to recover court fees etc etc.

 

3. And unless they here from me with my proposals for settlement they are instructed to refer it back to their client to commence with proceedings WITHOUT further notice to me.

 

So.... where do i go from here? i am tempted to ignore it again and see if any court papers turn up. Either that or to send a simple letter saying i did not recieve the initial letter of claim to drag it out?

 

Any more help would be greatly appreciated guys.

 

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

do not respond

its a speculative invoice

 

it is not a legal fine

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its standard practice

 

letter before 'what' action

 

then it will be littered with if,might, maybe, might, could, instructed

 

you might find it to your advantage to look at some thread in the rlp forum.

 

i cant find any evidence of any hotel winning in court

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree with all the above, it appear to be another RLP-type money making scheme, shame on Travelodge for getting involved in such tactis.

 

If it were me, I'd assumethat it is a valid NBA and that the next step isnt lots of threatening letters (although there prob will be), but the next step should be court action, of course it is highly unlekley that there would be court action as there would have to be very good proof of smoking and I'm sure you two could provide lots of excellent witness statement proving that you do not smoke !

 

Of course just like RLp claims this is very unlikely to go anywhere near a court room but i would reply anyway, denying the claim, pointing out you do not smoke, and pointing out that you would seek to recover the maximum costs should legal action be taken, also copy these letters to Travelodge saying how disgusted you are and that you will never stay in one of their premises again :)

 

Nothing will hapopen, people that are genunine will issue a NBA with no ifs, buts and maybes, people who use such terms have no intention of going to court.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks andy,

 

Well my girlfriend and I do smoke, which may run against our favour. But the claim is still rediculous, we've stayed at the particular hotel around 15 or 20 nights this year, so its kick i8n the teeth.

 

Yeah im unsure as of the next move. I think both ignoring it and Replying with Denial are the right things to do.lol at the end of the day like the good people on here say, if i havnt done it i have nothing to worry about. But yet the doubt creeps in, as im terrible at defending myself, sheer accusations of things i havent done make me nervous which makes me look guilty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks andy,

 

Well my girlfriend and I do smoke, which may run against our favour. But the claim is still rediculous, we've stayed at the particular hotel around 15 or 20 nights this year, so its kick i8n the teeth.

 

Yeah im unsure as of the next move. I think both ignoring it and Replying with Denial are the right things to do.lol at the end of the day like the good people on here say, if i havnt done it i have nothing to worry about. But yet the doubt creeps in, as im terrible at defending myself, sheer accusations of things i havent done make me nervous which makes me look guilty.

 

Whoops I mis-rerad your original post.

 

Well ultimately they can send all the various threats they want, the onl;y thing that matters is will they take legal action, I think not, as it just woulkdnt be worhwhile in a small claims court, they are limited to costs and they would had to travel to your local court so almost certainly isnt worth the hassle...proving someone had smoked in their is pretty impossible too apart from staff saying it smelt.

 

Dont worry, courts require you to put everything out in writing so you have time to prepare, of coutrse, it is highly unlikely it would get that far.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi, did anything ever happen to your civil claim Gazzaboy? I've just received a similar letter, but this claims I've done damage to a wall totalling £400, which is just crazy! I've also stayed at this hotel numerous times, and I've stayed there since the alleged damage happened, and not a single person from Travelodge has mentioned it!! Did you just ignore it and they went away? any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, did anything ever happen to your civil claim Gazzaboy? I've just received a similar letter, but this claims I've done damage to a wall totalling £400, which is just crazy! I've also stayed at this hotel numerous times, and I've stayed there since the alleged damage happened, and not a single person from Travelodge has mentioned it!! Did you just ignore it and they went away? any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Kind regards

 

 

i'd start your own thread

 

this is +6mts old

see below

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...