Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

old Egg loan ScotCall/Arrow Global/Westcot - Now Claimform***Claim Discontinued***


LordSuggs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1750 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've recently found this forum and am looking for some guidance on how best to proceed with a loan I have.

 

The background:

 

I was experiencing financial pressures with my business in 2005

and took out an Egg personal loan to pay off a credit card bill

 

I had accumulated while trying to keep the business afloat

- yes stupidly I was accumulating personal debt to support my business.

 

Obviously this didn't help, and in 2006 I then took a further loan to raise the amount to £20k.

 

About this time I had an accident in my house and all my paperwork were lost in the resulting effects.

(it never rains but it pours!).

 

Due to the business failing and my own poor mental state,

I stopped paying on the account in early 2008.

 

My business failed shortly after and I had to go on JSA and move in with a family member,

whilst also struggling with depression.

 

After being chased relentlessly by Scotcall,

I started paying £1 a month in a temporary agreement.

 

I attempted to agree a full and final settlement with them in early 2009,

when a family member agreed to pay £2.4k,

 

but they would only agree to a partial settlement

- after discussing with the national debtline they said they wouldn't trust that

as far as they could throw it,

 

I declined the offer and asked if we could agree a further £1 a month settlement whilst I was still on JSA.

 

However I didn't hear back from them after this.

 

That was until June this year,

when I received a notice of assignment that Arrow Global had taken over the account from Egg

and I would be dealing with Westcot.

 

Learning from my dealings with Scotcall,

I have changed mobile number, so am only dealing with them via mail.

 

I have just started a new part time job and come off JSA,

 

I can afford a small amount a month and following their contact with me,

 

I offered them £5 a month for 6 months.

 

They responded by sending me a blank Direct Debit form to fill in

- no acknowledgement of my offer,

no agreement stated, no amount, no dates....

I was expected to sign it and send it back to them.

 

Of course I didn't and asked them for their account number which I could pay into myself.

 

After obfuscating for two more letters,

I have finally received a Standing Order form from them,

which they ask to fill in and send back to them.

 

Now my dealings with Scotcall have hardened me somewhat,

I am not as intimidated by them as I would have been a few years ago.

But I am still unsure of the best way forward.

 

Should I send this back to them or just go ahead and pay the £5/month online now I have their account details?

Given that I have no paperwork, I'm guessing a CCA request is a given, but do I write to Egg or Arrow Global?

 

Anyone know if Arrow Global are more receptive to full and final offers than Egg were?

 

Any other pointers would be gratefully received

 

- I wish I'd found this forum years ago!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under no circumstances complete the Direct Debit. Using the bank details provided set up a standing order which you control or ensure you pay each month using your online banking facility.

 

there have been on or two reports on the forums where DCAs have helpe themselves, or increased the direct debit value without consultation.

 

I would then confirm what you have done in writing... just advise that your bank account doesnt support direct debit payments.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that the CCA request should go to the original creditor. However, I have seen others say it should go to the current owner of the account.

 

Not much help on that one, was I :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah thanks - will do a bit of digging around and see if anyone's had any success with either approach.

 

Thanks also to the person who just messaged me with tips - I can't reply by message as I don't have 5 posts yet :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth having a read of the two links below.

 

The first is quite lengthy, the 2nd contains letter templates. I think once you have received a response to your CCA request, or not as the case might be.. you may need to confirm if they DO actually retain a copy of the original.. especially if they have decided to send you a reconstituted copy.. which is acceptable for the s78 request, but not for any litigation.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?291468-Fighting-back-with-CPUTR-2008....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?317447-Request-for-confirmation-of-documents-under-CPUTR-2008

 

If you look at PriorityOne's threads, you will also find a thread where you can ask questions in respect of anything CCA

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd look at your cra file and see who owns the debt.

 

then fire the cca off at them.

 

i'd also consider an sar to EGG

 

as i bet there is some reclaiming to do somewhere!

 

for the minute, i'd pay no one anything till we get your ducks inline.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I have had a look at my file and the loan is now definitely with Britannica Recoveries.

 

I've also got listings on the old Egg card going back to 2000.

 

So guess that's the plan then - CCA to Britannica and SAR to Egg.

 

Thanks for the help guys - really appreciated. Will update once/if I hear back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, well I've heard back from my CCA request.

Arrow Global, Acting as agent for Britannica Recoveries have said:

 

"DEBT OWED TO Britannica Recoveries, Assigned by Egg

 

We do not accept that we are the creditor as envisaged by the above statute.

 

However we are willing to assist in obtaining that which has been requested.

 

We will now process your request for documentation from the creditor and will revert in due course"

 

Anyone know how this affects the 12 + 2 days time limit?

 

Also, do I just send one onto Egg now rather than wait for them to do so,

since they returned my £1 postal order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

p'haps a CCA is a waste of time

but will confuse the brits!

 

get an SAR off to egg.

 

lets see whats actually going on here.

 

dont forget NONE of the people chasing you/involved have ANY legal powers

so no paying them yet.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't affect timescale - my advice would be to send account in disput letter.

 

Intend

 

Thanks for the advice - sorry, a bit confused.

 

The letter in dispute surely works on the basis that the timescale has expired?

 

So wait for the 12+2 days, and then send, yes?

 

The relationship between Arrow Global and Brittanica is close enough to be incestuous, and gives the lie to their whining in their rather curiously worded letter.

 

It's got me confused - my credit report says the debt is with Brittanica,

 

the letter received from Arrow says it's nothing to do with them and it also says it's assigned from Egg.

 

p'haps a CCA is a waste of time

but will confuse the brits!

 

get an SAR off to egg.

 

lets see whats actually going on here.

 

dont forget NONE of the people chasing you/involved have ANY legal powers

so no paying them yet.

 

dx

 

Take the bull by the horns, so to speak? I received a letter from Westcott too trying it on, but it is dated before Arrow's. They certainly do like trying to exert pressure!

 

A question on SAR - given that there was a credit card AND loan with Egg, do I need to specifically highlight each of these, or does a SAR cover all dealings with this company? Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a SAR covers all data, all accounts.

:lol:

Successfully claimed back mis-sold PPI (Barclays Bank) 2009-10 (£8500)

Ran a paid-for DMP. Deeply respect those who self-manage a DMP; it is possible to do with the help of fellow CAGGERS

Offered F&F to all my creditors. All closed out including a particularly intransigent and stubborn one - who eventually saw sense after 10 months of nonsense!

Does not condone debt avoidance but violently disagrees with the antics of debt collectors and their behavior towards the ones trying to pay. I am a great believer in what goes around, comes around. Keep up the good fight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi there.

Time for an update.

 

Early January I received a second letter from Arrow Global/Britannica Recoveries

from my earlier requested CCA,

saying they are still awaiting receipt of documentation from the assignee Egg.

 

So I sent off aSAR request to Egg. They replied last week as follows:

 

"This letter is about your Egg Account

 

Thank you for your request for an executed copy of the credit agreement for account number XXXXXX

with Egg Banking Plc under section 78 (1) of the consumer credit act 1974

 

As the account you refer to is now closed I have to inform you that Egg

are under no obligation to comply with a request for a copy of the executed agreement

under the Consumer Credit Act as we no longer have a contractual relationship relating to this account

nor are we seeking to enforce any agreement on the account.

 

The right to be provided with this information from Egg Banking plc ended with the closure of this account.

 

Section 78 (3) (a) of the Consumer Credit Act states that section 78 (1) does not apply

where 'no sum is, or will or may become payable by the debtor'.

 

The right to request an executed copy of the agreement is found in part VI of the act,

which is entitled 'Matters arising during currency of credit or hire agreements.'

 

so where an agreement is no longer current the right to request or be provided

with a copy of the executed agreement therefore ceases.'

 

In my request to them, I only gave my address and did not specify account numbers.

 

So what they've done is commented on my closed Egg card, and not mentioned the Egg Loan.

And also they have not returned the £10 postal order!!

Anyone have any idea what they're playing at?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather odd statement to make from EGG..

If no agreement is going to be forthcoming, the new owners are going to have a hard time pursuing any balance outstanding.

 

 

I have asked for further advice on this one :) the new owners wont be able to "reconstitute" an agreement that's for sure.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

told ya

 

now i take it that was a reply to your cca

 

is the sar still on its way?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, citizenb - appreciated :)

 

To clarify, all Egg have mentioned in their reply is the number of the Egg card account I had prior to my loan. No mention of the reference number of the Egg loan that Arrow/Brittanica have been corresponding to me about. Both accounts had the same home address.

 

Hi DX,

 

The Brittanica/Arrow reply was the response to the CCA - effectively saying we've not heard back from Egg.

 

The SAR request to Egg elicited the long reply I quoted, bypassing any reference to my outstanding loan and only mentioning the closed Egg card account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 15 is in relation to a CCA

s78 is nowt to do with an SAR

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, if they dont comply with the SAR within 40 calendar days.. then you can issue a court claim in order to force their compliance :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the 40 days is up and they haven't produced the documents then you would need to write a letter stating that they hadn't complied fully with your SAR, enclose a copy of the original SAR request.....give them a further 7 days from recepit of your letter something similar to this - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?178660 I think it might also be wise to state in that letter that if they do NOT hold the documents you requested then they should confirm this in writing to you....

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, EGG are saying if they closed the account monies are not due???

:lol:

Successfully claimed back mis-sold PPI (Barclays Bank) 2009-10 (£8500)

Ran a paid-for DMP. Deeply respect those who self-manage a DMP; it is possible to do with the help of fellow CAGGERS

Offered F&F to all my creditors. All closed out including a particularly intransigent and stubborn one - who eventually saw sense after 10 months of nonsense!

Does not condone debt avoidance but violently disagrees with the antics of debt collectors and their behavior towards the ones trying to pay. I am a great believer in what goes around, comes around. Keep up the good fight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really appreciate the advice, fellas. Will update again once the 40 days expire or if any more correspondence arrives.

 

brokebutnotbeatn - not overly sure, since they only make reference to my closed Egg credit card. Hopefully if they respond to the SAR that will clarify thing...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well someone's been busy. Reconstituted agreement received from Arrow/Britannica and 400 odd pages received from Egg in relation to my SAR including credit card statements going back to 2000. Please help - where do I even start with this lot?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...