Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Appeal Support Group / WRAG Advice needed


Error_Prone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4543 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Contribution based ESA.

 

I had been in the Support Group for around two years but was moved to the WRAG following a "medical" a few months back.

 

Ironically I "passed" the most recent medical. The previous two I "failed" but each time I obtained a reconsideration after submitting doctors letters without having to go to a formal appeal.

 

This time I queried the decision and was initially told it was automatic but should have been looked at by a decision maker. Meanwhile I had been sent an appointment for a "Work Focused Interview". I was told to contact the local office and ask for this to be postponed pending a decision. This was agreed.

 

A few weeks later I got a letter saying they were unable to change the decision but I could appeal if I wished.

 

I send in a detailed appeal with supporting evidence and a letter saying I couldn't see how their decision could be a "reconsideration" as apparently no original decision had been made!

 

Again, after a couple of weeks, I got a letter saying they would look again at the decision and if it could be changed in my favour the appeal would lapse.

 

This was five weeks ago and I heard nothing further. I'm still getting the WRAG paid into my account and have not been called to any further meetings.

 

Would I be best to chase this or let sleeping dogs lie? To be honest I would rather have the slightly lower amount of money than risk stirring things up and have to attend the "work Focused Interviews".

 

However I am conscious that the new rules mean I can only stay in the WRAG for 1 year (??) so presumably this will come to an end in about 9 months time if I don't get upgraded.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new rules mean you can stay in WRAG for as long as they feel you need to. (as it is now) But after one year, you'd get no money if you don't meet the income based criteria and you have spent the last year on contributions based ESA.

 

OK, thanks.

 

However, unless I'm missing something the only benefit to me would be getting credited with NI contributions??

 

I have more than enough years for a full basic state pension. Do these contribute to the second state pension? Otherwise would the only value be remaining eligible for contribution based benefits in the future such as the ESA Support Group should I meet the medical criteria?

 

For the foreseeable future my assets are too high to be eligible for anything means tested.

 

Also, does the year start from when I was moved to the WRAG (I was in the Support Group before).

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Thanks.

 

So, if I remain in the WRAG until the year is up and payments stop what we are saying is that they would continue to credit me with NI contributions presumably subject to still attending the dreaded ESA "medical" etc? If at any stage I get put back in the support group payments would start again?

 

As I mentioned I have more than enough NI contributions for a full state pension. Therefore if I drop out of the ESA system because it is too much hassle just for the contributions how long would I remain eligible for contribution based ESA should my condition worsen to their idea of Support Group level?

 

I'm not willing to claim contribution based JSA for the six months it would be available as the procedures would be counterproductive to my health.

 

I realise I am fortunate in that I don't desperately need the money. I believe I am entitled to ESA on medical grounds at support group level and I have sent in an appeal with appropriate doctor's letters etc. However this seems to have vanished into a black hole!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...