Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt_mountain vs BOS


debt_mountain
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good news bad news time.

 

Bad news is the BOS are playing silly beggars with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) data. Only sent some statements on 1 current account, otherone not even mentioned along with 1 of my loan accounts. Will keep pushing them for the next 2 weeks until the 40 dyas are up. I would rather have the info so I can start claiming than have to chase them for not replying fully.

 

Good news is the loan agreement they sent has a "purpose for loan" in the application form of "to pay off overdraft" so this will be included in my papers as a consequence of the unlawful charges. Hopefully a further £4500 going on some other claims.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you can send them a letter telling them how long they have left to comply with your dpa/sar request.

if i have helped you at all click please the scales on top right!

 

ABBEY

11/4 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) SENT OFF

1/6 LBA SENT

22/7 LETTER SENT REQUESTING THEM TO REFUND CHARGES

15/7 STATEMENTS RECEIVED (ALL 6 YEARS WORTH)

20/7 CLAIM ISSUES IN OLDHAM COUNTY COURT.

8/8 CLAIM ACKNOWLEDGED GIVING THEM TILL 21/8.......

SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!

 

T MOBILE i won!

16/6 Data Protection Act SENT OFF

 

5/8 t mobile have failed to comply with the Data Protection Act/S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) reques ....BRING IT ON BABY!!

7/8 LBE SENT GIVING THEM 7 DAYS TO COUGH UP MY CASH

7/9 FULL REFUND BEEN SENT!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have just written that letter pointing out they have just over 1 week to comply. I am lovin' this new found confidence this site has given.

 

The shoe (or gutty in Scotland) is well and truly on the other foot.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they miss the 40 day dealine lodge a complaint against them with the Information Commissioner's Office. Things tend to move on a bit quicker after that...

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The 40 days has now passed and not all the info has been received so I am now going to send an LBA as I have read that the Information Commisioner route is currently lengthy due to the amount of claims so LBA it is.

 

I am just going to give them 7 days or its off to court.

 

I have used template 3 in the Library files.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

currently having fun with these guys. They have failed the 40 day limit, failed the 7 day addition and got a call from Customer services asking for another couple of days to investigate before I proceed. I gave them til Friday. 3 days extra.

 

they say the clock for the 40days doen't start til they receive the DSAR and they have not received it yet as there is no proof.....I gave here the recorded slip numbers. "Oh" she said.

 

Roll on Friday.

 

 

complete cock up by them.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well I sent my LBA off last week for 1 account (the one they had sent all the sataments for), the next day in the post they (a different department) made me an offer for 4 times the amount I was requesting. There was an acceptance form attached for me to sign and return.

 

I called them to try to understand what this was all about.

 

After investigating they said that this offer was for my second account, I asked "is that the account you have not yet sent me the statements for"? "Yes" was the reply.

 

I have today sent a fax for a part payment acceptance, accepting the offer in part payment for the second account but as they have failed the SAR and not supplied the statements I cannot accept this as F&F settlement (I would never do that anyway). I also informed them in the fax about the LBA they received last week and that if no offer was made on that account was received the N1 would be in the court on Monday next week.

 

today they called saying all the statements had been posted yesterday by speciial delivery and I would have them today.

 

Lets see what they were trying to hide by withholding the statements.

 

Sly old dogs that they are.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I got home the full set of statements were sitting on the door mat and once I had entered all the data into a spreadsheet it was obvious that the bank were trying a fast one. the charges added upto 3 times the amount offeres and even compound interest at 8% came to another 4 times their offer. So off goes my next fax to BAS/Halifax, again for a hugh amount of my unlawfully taken funds.

 

What a christmas we will be having.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a reply to my acceptance fo their part payment, but they have now chucked the toys out the pram and have taken my acceptance letter of the part payment along with my request for the full amount of charges (some 4 times their first offer - without me knowing what they owed me) as a rejection letter and withdrawn to initial offer. Oh dear Mr Judge may not look to kindly on that.

 

LBA ready to post when the prelim times out.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Posted the N1 to my nearest English court along with the fee.

 

Claiming a reasonable 4 figure sum + authorised interest and loss of savings interest

 

Can anyone tell me the BOS process through the English courts? Do they generally pay up the day before the end of the 14 day acknowledgement period or do they file a defence or wait for the AQs to be filed?

 

I have searched but not yet got an answer.

 

thanks

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they follow their stablemates Halifax then it does not usually go to AQ.

They will acknowledge and state intention to defend.

a couple of days later they usually settle.

As always though I say be prepared ......its not 100% that they will follow the route as they have done.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they follow their stablemates Halifax then it does not usually go to AQ.

They will acknowledge and state intention to defend.

a couple of days later they usually settle.

As always though I say be prepared ......its not 100% that they will follow the route as they have done.

 

Thanks Martin3030, I have issued the papers on the HBOS head office so it should follow the Halifax timetable.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got another letter from HBOS yesterday. I nearly wept as I read it, I could hear the violins in the background. They said they had offered my 6 months worth of my charges back but I had rejected that (no, I actually accepted it as part payment, but HBOS took the huff and recinded the offer but it was also before they had sent me my statements so how would I know if it was a good deal). They go on saying there are charges for bounced items (well tell me what these charges are then!!) what a shame....

 

Guess this reply was before they were served with the N1 form then.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a photo copy of the above letter again for my LBA stage, shame they havent realised that the N1 was issued on them on Friday.

 

Also got a reply to my prelim telling them to stop sharing my data without my permission. Lets see how that one goes.

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

no transferred to a Halifax thread as I have prelim'd, LA'd and N1'd Halifax Customer Relations. Just waiting for them to acknowledge it.....

 

>£5000 6 years and contractual interest.

 

Debt Mountain vs Halifax (Bank of Scotland)

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...