Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
    • surprised you gave that frost article the light of day HB Long been the case that no further evidence of his wing-nutishness needed. Heck he even railed against the rubbish grate deal he largely created
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

tcd v rbs - late offer dilemma


tabbycatsdad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Some expert (and otherwise) advice will be gratefully received as I have reached a crossroads. This is my first post and I'll try to be brief...

 

I have a claim against RBS (for around £1,800 + OD interest) that started in April with the usual request for a refund which quickly led to a standard letter offering around £400.

 

I wrote with a LBA and to refuse the payment as full and final, but accepted as part settlement. The response this time was a blank refusal by RBS and their 'final word' (but I got the £400).

 

Rather carelessly I was sidetracked and didn't carry out my threat but instead wrote again two weeks ago reiterating my position and giving a further (final) 14 days.

 

I received a reply today (deadline day) with an offer of around £1,100. This is not far short of the charges total and I'm tempted to accept and avoid more time consuming hassle. However, they have imposed conditions that are unreasonable (i.e. all future charges must stand).

 

The one thing I did which was silly was claim interest from the start using the incorrect spreadsheet form (the 8% one was the only one I found back in April). However, I did change tack recently and asked only for the charges with the threat of this interest to be added in court.

 

I see I have four options:

 

1. Sign the form, take the cash (because I need it) and accept their conditions.

 

2. Accept the cash only on the basis that future charge be in accordance with the law - and in effect offer them more time to refuse/wriggle.

 

3. Hold out for the £1,403 and start the court process (because I can't extend their deadline another day longer than I have to).

 

4. Go for broke and present a more accurate claim for interest charges too - perhaps using the more recently available spreadsheet - but actually risk getting in a legal pickle.

 

What would you do?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

tcd

 

 

PS. £1,100 is a lot of money to me and I can't risk losing it. However, there is a principle here and I want to win. Is that additional £300 worth going after? Or could the bank see my case as weakened by my mistake and have a go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

PS. £1,100 is a lot of money to me and I can't risk losing it. However, there is a principle here and I want to win. Is that additional £300 worth going after? Or could the bank see my case as weakened by my mistake and have a go?

 

First thing to say here is that you won't lose the money ;)

£300 is quite a lot of money and would obviously be very useful to you. It's your money and in my opinion you should go for it :) I think you could correct your initial mistake at the MCOL stage by filling in the more recent spreadsheet and using those figures in your claim. I don't think you'll get in a 'legal pickle' at this stage ;) Oh and don't give the bank even an extra day. You've already given them more than enough time. You'll get full settlement eventually and there will be no need to agree to any conditions the bank may make (they'll probably want confidentiality - don't agree.)

Good luck and let us know how you get on :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second that ;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks indeed.

 

I'll refuse the offer on their terms and request full payment with OD interest and send a new spreadsheet printout with the more accurate figures.

 

I gather I am also being advised to begin the court process at the same time (as the deadline has passed). Is this right?

 

Thanks

 

tcd

 

PS. What a great resource this is!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

I assume the bank said the offer of around £1100 was in 'full and final settlement' ? In which case, they are not prepared to yield any further. You've asked nicely at least 3 times ;) - I'd start filing your claim now :). You could, if you really wanted to, write to the bank rejecting the offer and telling them you have started court proceedings but I wouldn't bother asking again. When you've filed your claim, send the spreadsheet with the correct figures (!) to the Northampton court (I'm assuming you're going to do the claim online?) with a covering letter and your claim no. Best of luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, yes it was in full and final, but they said that when I was offered the £400!

 

I think I'll start proceedings but write back one last time with more accurate interest figures. At least then they'll have a copy. I assume if I get lucky and they settle I can always withdraw my court claim (but lose the fee).

 

tcd

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...