Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West CCJ & PPi Claim


knights templar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Every body;

 

Contracted Nat West ;

 

Nat West Loan was a combination of loan and Overdraft which the bank advised me to take.

Defaulted on both loans due to unemploymement.

 

Nat West obtained a CCJ.

 

Payment in order since Court order.

 

Can I apply for refund of the PPI on both loans from both banks although there is a CCJ on both loans and how can I effectively do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read up in the PPI forum

 

and yes you can reclaim the PPI

 

what about unlawful fees too

 

bet you had loads on the HFC one.

 

you indicate TWO loans

one Natwest

one HFC

 

both have individual ccj's?

 

you'll need to make a thread for each claim

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

do a customer complaint form and SOC for each

 

if you've not got the agreements/statements

you'll need to SAR each first

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

thread tidied

 

how are your claims going KT?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx10uk;

 

Sorry for the long delay ; have being on holiday ;

received responses from Nat West and HFC on PPI claim ;

 

Nat West claims that according to their records no PPI payment made on loan and

HFC states that the PPI payments were later with drawn by me ;

this I find puzzling;

but received a refund from Black horse less tax;

I must say the cheque is handy as I just came back from holiday;

I plan to pursue any bank charges on the Nat West loan which I defaulted.;

 

as for HFC; I will request formal details of all documentation on the loan as I do not have details of the agreement to find out whether what they are saying is correct:roll::oops:;

you can't trust these 'alleyway[EDIT] ';

 

Any ideas or suggestions.KT:wink:

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Have just received an offer from Nat West Bank for a reclaim of my PPI application;

but they have put a conditionality of acceptance that the pay out will be offset against the balance of the loan;

 

which I have expressed concerns on grounds that the loan is curently being paid off after a county judgement and payment are up to date;

 

secondly the PPI as I understand it is an unfair and illegal charge on the loan by the bank.

 

Any comments on my line of reasonning to Nat West Bank for the refund to be paid directly to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cannot offset against the whole of the balance even with a CCJ

thats unfair to your other creditors.

 

just remember its a civil debt so PPI is unlawful not illegal [thats criminal matters]

 

i would write back stating you will not be bound by any conditions.

 

the debt is being paid off through the CCJ

 

there is no authority in the judgement box that allows them to do that

 

in effect they are going against the ruling of the judge.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how does the ppi refund measure up to you soc figure

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Works on part-time basis for a transport business ; but lately do not get much work; what are my rights under the employment act; have been with company for over 5 years ; just keep quiet or ask company to find me work or make me redndant any suggestions?:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

natwest , hfc now lloyds

 

 

you really should have a thread for each

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi CAGS ; Happy christmas and Properous New Year to every one !!!!!!!!!!!

 

Have just received a letter from Nat West Bank accepting liability that the following charges were applied to my account between the periods 1904 to 1912;

 

these included upaid item fess ,

account keeping fees

and unarraged borrowing fees;

 

is it possible to claim back these charges from National Westminster Bank?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1904?

 

were these bank account charges

 

if so very diff?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx 100uk; Sorry made a 'boob' on the date ; well spotted; the date should be 2004 and not 1904; I quote from letter sent from National Westminster Bank; ' ftom your current account -I have reviewed transactions data between 09/12/2012 and 02/3/04 and can confirmthe total amount in charfes applied was £942.82' ; can I make a claim as it clearly states they were charges.:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

not on bank accounts

 

but try

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

ims21,

Sent SAR to Nat. West Bank ;

just received a response from Nat West Bank ;

after I had highlighted to them inadequate documantation they hold on me ;

their response was unable to locate loan agreement ;

they claim as they were unable to locate loan agreement ;

we would therefore have no documents available apart from insurance added to the account.

 

What should my next move be ?

 

They conclude if I was not satisfied I should contact the Financial Ombudsman.

 

knights Templar:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21; Received SAR response from Nat. West Bank today ;

 

Nat West Bank unable to trace my loan agreement may send available information in the near future ;

 

Nat West Bank state ;

 

if not satisfied contact ombudsman ;

 

any ideas how to approach this or contact ombudsman for further investigation.

 

knights templar:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry...this is all very confusing.

 

You said earlier that NW stated they have no PPI showing on the account. (Post #11)

 

Then you say they have made an offer (Post #12)

 

What did their offer consist of, i.e. what is the breakdown of the figures?

 

If they have no agreement, what have they said about how they calculated the offer?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,

 

Received received from Nat West Bank ;

upon SAR request ;

that Nat West Bank unable to locate loan agreement and documents ;

although a judgement debt have been obtained at county court by Nat.West Bank

and debt being paid by instalments;

is it possible to challenge NatWest Bank to produce loan agreeement and documents in court

otherwise debt cannot be enforced by Nat West Bank .

 

knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi dx;

just received another offer from Nat.Westmister Bank that upon further investigation into my previous claim

which they have already settled ;

 

they claim to have found further errors and have made another offer again ;

but wish to offset this payment to my CCJ default balance ;

 

I know you have made a response to the same after the initial offer was made ;

 

does the same written response stand or are there any new information on the issues of offsets by these banks ;

 

the CCJ is being paid off .Thanks

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is your NatWest ppi thread.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...