Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hardship allowance


oblivious
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4579 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am due to be sanctioned can anyone tell me the procedure for claiming hardship allowance?

Can I claim it over the phone as the advisor did not want to give me the form as she kept telling me you cannot apply for the first two weeks and as the sanction is not official yet I cannot apply untill it is.

 

As I am a single parent I have been told that I can apply straight away as I am in the vulnerable group catagory.

 

Does anyone know how long this takes to process?

 

Thanks for any replies in advanced

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardship allowance is not normally claimable for the first 2weeks of sanctioning. However if your a single parent (and the sanction was not because you fraudulently claimed as a single person) then you can make the claim immediately.

 

You have to go to the job centre to do this. It is then passed to a decision maker who will advise you of the outcome

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

also I do not know if anyone knows about your job seekers book.

 

when the advisor told me I was getting my jsa suspended I left in a fluster and left my book behind on the advisors desk will they send it back to me or do I have to go ask for it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

tidon I am being sanctioned for not writing to employers or ringing them despite applying for jobs.

 

I am totally fed up with them in the 8 weeks I have been claiming they have tried to stop my money five times, I managed to get the others cancelled.

 

Every time time I go to sign on they scrutinise everything, however they do not take my circimstances into consideration, I suffer from mild depression and anxiety which they know about and I am due to go back to uni. I feel like they are purposely out to stop my money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have appealed put all this down plus the anxiety and stress and the fact you are seeing the gp over this.its not as if you didn't have good reasons'.

 

they are expected to view job search positivity and do not appear to have here.the problem with jobseekers agreements is that they are often drawn up as the advisor dictates,they will always try to maximise the conditionality.not everyone is feeling up to this because of health/finance's and general ability.with more people being forced onto this benefit there are real risks of unfair sanctions.

 

the agreement must reflect means and health issues that do not involve the runaround,working ridiculous hours/impossible to get to locations and great expense. and you are a single parent under anxiety that could rapidly worsen,then what would you do?.

 

do not take this on the chin and except their version,vulnerable people cannot afford to go without and be discouraged from their rights to fair redress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying seen it before but I have not recieved a decision yet so I cannot appeal anything as yet. I have probably put myself at a disadvantage because I refused to fill the form out they gave me as I felt it was a waste of time. Like I have said in my other thread they state possible sactions are sent to the decision maker but before they are sent I have it recorded saying they look at them and decide whether or not its a straght sanction or not if its they decide the decision maker will sanction they do not send them. As far as I understand it they just go off your agreement and if ti says on there to write or ring you have nothing to argue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are spot on seen it before i made the mistake of accepting what the advisor put on the agreement thinking it would be reasonabler and fair, however I have found this not to be the case. I do not the energy to fight as I cannot find revelevant guidelines or legislation to argue my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the advisor did not want to give me the form as she kept telling me you cannot apply for the first two weeks and as the sanction is not official yet I cannot apply untill it is.

 

you need to appeal because of your anxiety and health grounds,they have to make allowances for these problems.

 

you need to go to the cab office that doesn't sound right either two weeks wait and you are a single parent.

Edited by seen this before
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

You will not be given form GL24 (to appeal) or JSA10 (to claim hardship) until a decision is made and only then if then if it is an unfavourable decision resulting in a sanction. The only person who can actually sanction your claim is the DMA officer not your personal adviser. Your personal adviser has to follow the guidance for conditionality and if there is any doubt then a referal has to be made.

As as single parent then you are highly likely to qualify for the hardaship (if needed) from day 1 of the imposed sanction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou for your replies. I will ring on monday to see what the situation is. If a decision has not been made yet then I will to wait till one is before I put put an appeal in and then claim hardship.

 

I understand what you have said flumps, however I have proof that this is how they work. I was sent two forms and I handed them in the same day and late in the day after 3pm. The day after I went to sign on and one of the forms was cancelled and another still active and that is when I asked why is one still on the system and the other one is not and that is when I was told they look at them first before deciding to send them. I asked where the DM where based and was told in a different town so a DM could not have seen it so quick and then made a decsion so quick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hello all an update I have been sactioned for 2 weeks....I put a claim in for hardship and that has been disallowed....I guess they do not care that I have a child to feed along with my housing benefit that has stopped and my daughters school meals how do they expect me to pay for those when I am not recieving JSA... because JSA is paid in arrears It has been 3 weeks since I recieved any payments and who knows if they decide I have not done enough next time I sign on it could be even longer... The way people are treated by DWP disgusts me. All I can do is appeal but what good is that when My daughter and I are having to suffer now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all an update I have been sactioned for 2 weeks....I put a claim in for hardship and that has been disallowed....I guess they do not care that I have a child to feed along with my housing benefit that has stopped and my daughters school meals how do they expect me to pay for those when I am not recieving JSA... because JSA is paid in arrears It has been 3 weeks since I recieved any payments and who knows if they decide I have not done enough next time I sign on it could be even longer... The way people are treated by DWP disgusts me. All I can do is appeal but what good is that when My daughter and I are having to suffer now.

 

How on earth can they do that..? Is your human rights been affected here as it says in "Article 3: Prohibition of Torture" that the government should not withhold state support from asylum seekers because doing this would leave them destitute (penniless).

Now i'm no expert on the human rights act but if the government wont sanction asylum seekers benefits then why should they do that to you and especially you have a child? You are going to be 2 weeks in debt as well with the rent, plus you will have to borrow till you get your money sorted and you dont no when thats going to be..! i can't beleive they can do this type of thing. I would try alsorts, i would get in touch with my local MP, email downing street and i would go as far as getting in touch with the european courts, yes i no they cannot do anything but i would still do it and get as loads more people from this site to write or fax them with issues about the same thing because they just cannot treat people like this.. its all wrong and i'm fuming.!!

Two people last week as been thrown off ESA, one is as blind as a bat and suffers with angina and depression and the other is autistic and doesn't understand a word anyone says to him and cannot speak a word himself, and both need carers.! yes they are appealing but that's not the point.. this type of thing should not happen..!!

Get in touch with everyone you can think of oblivious cos you have nothing to lose cos you've lost it all anyway..!

European Court of Human Rights

Council of Europe

67075 Strasbourg Cedex

France

Tel : +33 (0)3 88 41 20 18

Fax : +33 (0)3 88 41 27 30

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get to apply for a crisis loan straight away,and see if you can access a food bank.also contact the cab and write to your mp.you cannot afford to take this lightly.appeal also stating your health problems too.follow the advice above which is good too.

 

the whole key to this is apply for anything and to keep to a reasonably set out jobseekers agreement,keeping a record of what you have done.to stay organised do what i did write out monday-friday the steps you perform each day spread over the week on a notepad then copy them over to your job log as you go.depending on the job visiting employers could mean just checking supermarket vacancy boards for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

omg I have just found out the reason I have been refused hardship.... they said it was because I did not send the claim form in untill the 9th sept and the sanction was from 19th august till the 6th sept.....what planet do these people live on I was told when I went to sign on I could not claim untill a decsion had been made and that decision was made on the 9th sept....also how on earth could I have known before the 6th sept that I was going to be sanctioned as JSA is paid in arrears....The advisors at the job centre know nothing as I had to beg for hardship form in the first place as they told me I could not claim for the first two weeks....I cannot believe they cannot use common sense I infuriated

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou for your replies tidon and seen it before I am going to appeal and show them up for what they really are..... they are so incompetent that I have still not recieved a letter stating that I have been sactioned and not recieved a letter to say hardship has been refused...they cannot blame royal mail as they managed to get the letters sent out when a doubt has arisen within 2 days... I have applied for a crisis loan seen it before that is how I found out why they refused hardship and the guy on phone said that he would make a exception given the circumstances I been put in as usually he said they do not give them if in hardship because of a sanction and gave me a loan thankfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

omg I have just found out the reason I have been refused hardship.... they said it was because I did not send the claim form in untill the 9th sept and the sanction was from 19th august till the 6th sept.....what planet do these people live on I was told when I went to sign on I could not claim untill a decsion had been made and that decision was made on the 9th sept....also how on earth could I have known before the 6th sept that I was going to be sanctioned as JSA is paid in arrears....The advisors at the job centre know nothing as I had to beg for hardship form in the first place as they told me I could not claim for the first two weeks....I cannot believe they cannot use common sense I infuriated

 

This makes no sense at all. Your adviser recommends that because they feel you haven't done enough, you may get a sanction. This is then sent to a decision maker (DM) who makes the final decision. That can take a few days.

 

Was the 6th your signing on day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I have not been very clear ok...my signing on day was 1st sept....on this date I was told because I dod not write to or ring 3 employers each week my benefit would be suspended.... I then asked for a hardship form which she did not want ot give me but I refused to leave untill she gave me one....she gave me the form and told me I could not claim hardship untill a decision was made..... on the 6th sept which it the date I was supposed to be paid I did not receive any payment so I called the help line and they me I had been sanctioned from 19th August till the 1st sept.....the same day I sent off the hardship form which they have said they recieved on the 9th sept.....I was told that I should have claimed from the the first day of the sanction and that I had sent the form in too late!!! ...How could I have sent it in any sooner unless they think I am psychic and can see into the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just cannot understand the law that they have the right to stop peoples benefits and leave them destitute and in debt and especially more so in your care with you having a child? I no its hard to bring your human rights into it and the law is the law but the more people who go down different routes and complain in stead of just excepting it then it could get highlighted to show how people are been bullied, intimidated and treated like a animal. I would advise everyone to complain to there MP, downing street, solicitors, CAB and even write or fax European Court of Human Rights. People have nothing else to lose so why not..!

Glad you have got something anyway..!

Link to post
Share on other sites

that I have still not recieved a letter stating that I have been sanctioned

 

they are supposed to tell you but they clam up at that point and trying to get information is difficult patchy and time consuming.the worrying thing here again someone with anxiety and depression and being sanctioned.as you have these illnesses under the gp then there is grounds to appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...