Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
    • FTMDave - your cold light of day suspicions are correct, alas. Just had this back... Thank you for your email. I was very sorry to learn that you recently received a parking charge notice after shopping at our Kearsley Manchester Rd Express store. I appreciate this is always frustrating, especially as you'd just nipped in for the one item. I've had a look, and I can confirm that in this case the car park at this store is entirely owned by a third party - it is not owned or operated by Tesco in any way. The parking charge issued is on behalf of that third party, although I appreciate it does state Tesco on the letter. Regrettably as the car park is owned and operated by a separate company we don't have any form of influence or control over the parking charges issued. In this case, I can only recommend that you follow the appeals process outlined on the letter directly to take the matter up with UKPPO directly. I'm sorry that I cannot offer further help in this case.  Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you require anything further.  Kind regards Ewan Kelly Customer Service Specialist On behalf of the Chief Executive’s Office
    • The IMF estimates Russia's economy will grow faster than the likes of the US, UK and Germany this year.View the full article
    • Ye thats fine. They should come back before the date of your defence BUT   IN ANY CASE YOU MUST FILE YOUR DEFENCE. DO NOT AWAIT THE PAPERWORK PAST YOUR FILING DATE.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sarahmoon v Bank of Scotland


sarahmoon33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes it is fine to send to your local branch, but I wouldn't bother with Recorded Delivery - just an ordinary First Class stamp will do.

 

Good luck.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barracad, why not RD? Don't we need to have proof of delivery? especially if it goes to Court?

 

No, not at all.

 

CPR states that you only need proof you have posted the item - and a dated copy of a letter you have sent is sufficient proof that you posted it - you don't need a Certificate of Posting etc.

 

And whilst Recorded Delivery is only a few pence extra, if you read round the forums you will see that it sometimes causes extra problems which would have been avoided if you sent it ordinary First Class.

 

I strongly recommend you don't use Recorded Delivery when sending the prelim & LBA to the bank.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stongly recommended by whom?

 

I suggest you read the CPR for yourself if you don't believe me - a dated copy of the letter is proof enough that you sent the letter as far as the Courts are concerned.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its strongly recommended from the "common sence" society.

 

Depends what you're referring to.

 

If you are referring to getting a Certificate of Posting, then there is certainly no harm in it, but "common sense" would say what is the point of queuing up in a Post Office for something that isn't needed when the letter could be popped in a posting box.

 

If you are referring to using Recorded Delivery then "common sense" would suggest you look at the trouble other people have had when sending Recorded Delivery to large organisations such as banks.

 

Do not ill advise new members to do this.

 

I am merely giving advice, based on CPR, which states there is no requirement to either obtain a proof of posting, nor use Recorded Delivery.

 

by the way,what Bank do you work for??

 

I think this just sums up about everything you have said and proves how much "common sense" you have - I am sure people who have any "common sense" will be able to figure out who to listen to and whose advice they should take.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woooooaaaah that's a bit strong, I've never known Barracad to ill advise anyone! I just wanted his reasons for not using RD which are fair enough. I would rather use RD BUT if the Court will be satisfied with correspondance without, then Barracad would know.

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it gives you more peace of mind to get proof of posting then do so, but you don't need to use Recorded Delivery - you can ask for a FREE Certificate of Posting with any item you send at a Post Office.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it can only help in supporting your claim,atleast you can phone RoyalMail and find out when it was delivered by quoting your reference number.Atleast this way you are assured its in their hands and ,more importantly,being dealt with oppossed to "wondering" if it arrived.Also means that in the corresspondence that follows from yourself,you have the confidence that your letters are getting there too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You'll get a letter back saying they will deal with your complaint and reply within 4 weeks. If you wait....you'll get another letter from the Core Business team saying they need more time...another 4 weeks. I would send a second LBA with a completed court form attached and a dealine to action the court form. After that you'll have to file a court claim. Good luck!;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am confused about interest. I worked out on the spreadsheet the 8% interest from the date of the charge but what is judicial interest, is this different to the interest worked out on the spreadsheet.? Can someone throw some light on this as the more I read the more confused I become!!! Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Don't worry you've not messed up! when/if you get to the MCOL stage and you file a claim, from the date that RBS acknowledge the claim you can start claiming 8% apr daily for the sum total amount of the claim (except the Court fee of course). Make sense?

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes sarah it does make a difference.

You are in Scotland so the small claim threshold is different and you can't use MCOL . You need to fill in the claim forms,(upto £750) found here..use 1b

 

Small Claims Forms

 

Then use Scotias post here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/11123-scottish-procedure.html

 

This post will tell you EXACTLY what you need to fill in, either small claim or summary cause (depending on how much you're reclaiming)

All the best

mairi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise theres a difference with the forms, and I understand Small Claims Summons as I used to be a Legal Secretary and these were a big part of my job. What Im asking about it can I claim judicial interest in Scotland on top pf my claim, has anybody claimed it successfully here. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive used the same spread sheet you did, judicial interest is the interest youre claiming and it is set at 8%.

Ive had this part of the claim paid on all 4 of my claims on the BOS. Although had to annoy them about it on 1 claim as i think i may have forgotten to add the spread sheet, but they eventually coughed up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...