Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Home insurance claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4664 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am insured with Royal sun Alliance (buildings and contents). A few weeks ago i had a major leak in my bathroom . It was on a late Saturday and of course i couldnt get hold of them. I have been with them 10 years. Never made a claim and i have home emergency cover with them. All under the same policy. I called out a plumber he found the soil pipe from the loo was leaking. He had to remove the loo. remove all the tiles to the floor under the tiles was a sub floor that the contaminated water had leaked onto (the smell was disgusting). He had to remove all the boxing in of the pipe work as this was fitted on top of the floor tiles. plus he had to remove the wash hand basin I have a pregnant woman living with me so this was really urgent. The basin was put in the garden out of the way this got knocked over and broke. The plumber put the loo back temporarily until he could go and get the materials. I had a lovely bathroom before this happened. The plumber tried to keep his costs to a minimum All the refitting ie laying a new sub floor putting new floor down boxing in the pipework removing wc replacing damaged wall tiles clearing all junk out. Bearing in mind he had to come out late Satuday and Sunday came to in total £1.880 RSA will only pay £600 this doesnt even cover materials. they wont pay for labour. They are refusing to pay for some of the materials ie refitting of wc and soil pipe a new bath panel and other materials. I can understand them not paying for the basin but where do i stand. I have tried speaking to claims dept at RSA but the guy was so rude to me he wouldnt let me get a word in edgeways. Basically he told me thats all they will pay and no more. I will also mention i had another quote and it came out £100 more from another company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RSA were once a really good company, but that stopped about 10 years ago, when they decided to close down half of their UK general insurance operation, moving parts to India.

 

Suggest that you raise a complaint with RSA head office and threaten to get the FOS involved. Don't be afraid to phone their head office. They may be obstructive, but just ask to be put you through to the claims directors PA or be provided with contact details for head office complaints. Don't accept a brush off with details of a complaints office in some part of the UK, where you will be made to go round in circles.

 

Timothy Mitchell is their claims director.

RSA Insurance Group plc

9th Floor

One Plantation Place

30 Fenchurch Street

London

EC3M 3BD

UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7111 7000

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty for your response. They have now said they will consider the cost of the labour and will get back to me. I said to him you are basically asking the plumber to work free of charge. He said rsa dont have to pay labour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty for your response. They have now said they will consider the cost of the labour and will get back to me. I said to him you are basically asking the plumber to work free of charge. He said rsa dont have to pay labour.

 

So you have a water leak causing damage and RSA believe that contractors will do the work for nothing. If that were the case, as soon as you mentioned RSA were the Insurers to contractors, I think they would pack up their tools and make a quick exit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, More Than/RSA are useless.

What basis are they saying their not covering it? if you have home emergency, it covers the fix of the leak, if you have buildings, it covers the resultant damage.

The policy is probably quite specific like all home emergency and will state you have to get their agreement prior to carrying out the repairs. You say you couldn;t get through to them, can you document this, get a copy of your phone logs showing you were on hold (for say 20 mins?) if only for 5 that might not be reasonable. It will possibly be capped at £1000 or £1500.00. Potentially this is going under 2 types of cover with 2 excess's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...