Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Regal Credit Consultants & RBS card default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

This relates to a credit card debt with RBS

Well, it started off with Newmans, over 12 months ago who gave up and passed to Wescot, who passed to Regal who at the same time seemed to be working with Scotcall!

 

I have sent all the usuall letters of to Regal and have now received this letter

 

I am going to respond with a "agents attending my home" and an "account in dispute letter" anyone have any other suggestions?

 

MD2010

Edited by major debtor 2010
Original had personal info still visable
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MD2010

 

Newmans - Wescot - Regal - scotcall - and on and on and on etc.

 

Field collectors, Field Team, sounds like they're trying to assemble a football team.

 

Don't worry, someone else will advise better than I can

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore............

 

when was your last financial transaction?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last financial transaction probably 2007/8, is that significant?

 

 

It would have been had it been more than 6 years ago as that would have made it statute barred.

 

All you can do is send the dont visit me letter and remind them, that either they or their "Client" are obliged to fulfill your s78 request before any of the actions they mention can be taken.

 

You can also point out that RBS specialise in tarting out accounts in dispute with often, disastrous results for the DCA.

 

:)

  • Confused 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

dx asked about payment dates because it might have been statutory barred but if the last payment was 2007 or 2008 then it isn't.

 

Care to give some more details on the account? How much owing etc.

 

Have you sent CCA to ensure the collection activity is valid?

 

Are there any charges/late fees/over limit fees which can be claimed back?

 

Is there any ppi on it?

 

On what grounds is the account in dispute?

 

Regards

 

ims

Edited by ims21
  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Some information debt

 

 

£9.5k originally being collected by Newman in June 2010 from whom I requested CCA,

 

 

never had any reply;

 

 

Wescot started chasing in November 2010, advised them that i was waiting for CCA, originally requested from Newmans,

 

 

various correspondence but no CCA.

 

 

May 2011 started being chased by Regal advised them that CCA originally requested by Newmans and the account was therefore in dispute.

 

MD 2010

Edited by major debtor 2010
K (thousand) omitted after the amount figure
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, that address is the Card Center that holds records

for all Visa & Master card accounts for the major banks etc.

It's the same place your payment go to and cards are issued

from.

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi Guys

 

I have been chasing RBS to remove debt from my credit file as now been in default for in excess of 6 years. At last they have removed so all good on that front.

 

However, they are now stating that as they contacted me in 2011 via Regal, this debt is not "statute barred", see attached letter.

 

 

I haven't made any payments since Feb 2009, and correspondence in May 2011 related to my request for CCA

 

Suggestions as always very welcome

 

Thanks MD2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is he on about!!!

 

sending letters to debtors does NOT reset the SB clock.!!

 

neither do letters from you disputing a debt exists.

 

sounds like an office junior to me!!

 

so the debt should now not be showing

 

and as it IS over 6yrs since your last payment

then the debts gone too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

id ignore

but not any court forms ofcourse!

 

 

avatar is not too good BTW..please change it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not quite...

but once a debt is SB's

it remains SB's

nothing not even a judge can unbar a debt.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...