Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equifax tips for consumers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Maybe confusing this with a late payment marker ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe confusing this with a late payment marker ?

 

Sounds possible.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you are confused if you receive a default notice and rectify

the default within the time scale allowed there will be no default

to record.

 

With respect I am NOT confused whatsoever and much more conversant that you might imagine!

 

Financial institutions enter data on CRA's around a month in arrears. We are talking here about already entered data so it's going to be a couple of months old at least. Pay it off by all means however the debt will remain on the CRA file for all authorised users to see and whilst marked as 'satisfied' it WILL remain showing as a 'Default'. The usual 28 days is often simply not sufficient to pay the outstanding funds for closure. You might consider carefully before taking such an entity to County Court if they will not remove such an entry because there's a potential 'Catch 22' resolution to it if the notice is simply 'dificient'.

 

One should also be aware that for example a bank might allow you further time to pay a fixed loan. The loan will begin to show (entered) on CRA files as in arrears. When the marked time expires it will simply become marked as a 'Default' even thought you might still be paying them back, (albeit) at a lower rate. Normally 'Defaults' are finalised because individuals have simply not the funds to rectify the issue in time and normal procedure will mean a 'Default' will be entered - You'll be aware of the situation by whoever you owe the outstanding funds to although they might not mention they'll be detailing your payment history on a CRA.

 

'BRIGADIER2JCS' I was under the impression that you were aware of this basic 'procedual' course/manner of events regarding CRA's and the entries made 'freely' by financial institutions, aka 'their clients'. My sincere apologies as I was unaware you were obviously not on this occasion, misunderstanding my reply.

 

Michael

Edited by InformedSearcher

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

well then that gives you 2 mts to sort it then! by your theory........

 

the default wiull not be put through until you FAIL to recify the 'default' balance by their [+14 working days] deadline.

 

i thnk you are actually talking about LATE markers here.

 

they will record those regardless of what you do as you ARE 'late' paying

 

the same goes with over limit markers, there's nowt you can do to stop it.

 

most cra's operate an automatic policy ofmarking a file 'D' or '8' after 6 such successive makers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed DX,

Michael, Why shouldn't the crditor mark

your file with a default when as DX quite rightly

says according to your theory you have had

2 months to rectify the default.

Any variation of the ''agreed'' amount payable

either reduced payment or late payment constitutes

a default on said agreement.

You should also note that the ''procedures'' on placing

defaults, over limit and late payment markers varies

quite considerably between financial services companies,

card providers and banks etc.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I'm sure I said all that and understood exactly by my last post.

My point is (forget the late markers) the time when the Default itself is entered. Many people probably do not realise the late payments are even marked on CRA files in the first place and are not often the reasons for rejected applications. Plainly the 'Default' is what searches throw up and are quick to spot and then you do get a failed application, often panic, look at your CRA file and find it's going to be a serious burden for the next 6 years.

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

Regarding credit checks. I've just checked mine wih Noodle.co.uk and all clear. No mention of any CC debt. They tell you tat if there is no details of a company it may be because they haven't sent their details to Noodle. How will I know if it's on another credit ref agency file? Would I have to ask OC who they use?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt the OC would tell you, Call Credit( Noodle) is not

widely used by major lenders.

You should check Experian (Credit Expert) and or Equifax

both have 3o day free trials.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found that on the moneysavingexpert.com a helpful list of major companies and which credit reference agencies they use. Hope it helps everybody. You just type in name of Co (M & S in my case) and it told me they use Experian and Equifax. Yippee :lol:

 

This list has been around for sometime, but the major lenders flit around sometimes using on exclusively or the any

combination, it seems sometimes to vary on the type of account, which is why when an individual is declined credit

they are advised to ''check their credit files''.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found that on the moneysavingexpert.com a helpful list of major companies and which credit reference agencies they use. Hope it helps everybody. You just type in name of Co (M & S in my case) and it told me they use Experian and Equifax. Yippee :lol:

 

Could you post the link to this please ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Not quite sure how to paste but I just typed in search box "which credit agencies do companies use" When I got the links I saw one on the moneysavingexpert web. It went directly to the page. Then just pick an agency and type in name of co yr having trouble with and it tells you which one they use. If you have any problems go straight onto moneysavingexpert and search their site on search box. Sorry I can't be much more help but not very computer literate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes.Found it now .

 

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/cards/credit-reference

 

Although this is from 2007 as has been mentioned so maybe there have been changes.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

No, not unless the company that placed

the entry agrees, the CRAs cannot unilaterally

remove or change entries.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

How cum equifax can remove the default but the rest will not?

 

Quite simple they will have investigated/made enquires of the

company that bplaced the entry.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite simple they will have investigated/made enquires of the

company that bplaced the entry.

so wud I hav 2 join experian and the other cra's individually and ask them 2 remove the default? It was no fault of my own :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You MUST contact the company that placed the default first!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

 

Find something to enjoy every day.

 

[20190624]

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...