Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help! What should I do now?


heyheymymy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6404 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently started proceedings with my claim against RBS. In the absence of full statements for the last 6 years I obtained the last 6 months worth from a selection of online and written statements - it totalled £402 (inclusive of interest). I then wrote to RBS (05/09/06) requesting that the charges be refunded. I did this as a temporary measure pending the return of full statements for the last 6 years, which I am still waiting for. RBS then wrote to me (06/09/06) advising that they think their charges are fair blah blah blah, however as a goodwill gesture would offer £253 if no further claims were made relating to charges applied to my account.

Obiviously given that I'm waiting on full statements for the last 6 years, which I intend to claim for when received, agreeing to this would not be a wise thing as it would restrict me claiming a lot of money. Therefore what is the best action to now take?

a) Ignore the letter and wait for full statements then calculate my claim as a whole and start again?

b) Write to RBS advising I accept their offer, but advise I will still be claiming for charges made prior to the period I'm currently claiming?

c) other.

Thanks for your help.

heyheymymy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently started proceedings with my claim against RBS. In the absence of full statements for the last 6 years I obtained the last 6 months worth from a selection of online and written statements - it totalled £402 (inclusive of interest). I then wrote to RBS (05/09/06) requesting that the charges be refunded. I did this as a temporary measure pending the return of full statements for the last 6 years, which I am still waiting for. RBS then wrote to me (06/09/06) advising that they think their charges are fair blah blah blah, however as a goodwill gesture would offer £253 if no further claims were made relating to charges applied to my account.

 

Obiviously given that I'm waiting on full statements for the last 6 years, which I intend to claim for when received, agreeing to this would not be a wise thing as it would restrict me claiming a lot of money. Therefore what is the best action to now take?

 

a) Ignore the letter and wait for full statements then calculate my claim as a whole and start again?

b) Write to RBS advising I accept their offer, but advise I will still be claiming for charges made prior to the period I'm currently claiming?

c) other.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

heyheymymy

 

It is your call but why accept £253 at all - accept as partial settlement and you will still be claiming rest. There is a letter in templates for this.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NEVER agree to "full and Final settlement" or such like or indeed any form of words that have any effect of restricting your actions in the future.

 

As GIZMO11 says accept their money as part payment with no strings if you like but go for a full refund of charges and any interest they charged on them.

 

It's YOUR money - go get it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would my claim be predjudiced in anyway if I ignored their letter, continued to wait for my full set of statements and then started a new claim for the full amount charged from my account over the last 6 years including the last 6 months I've already put the wheels in motion for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would my claim be predjudiced in anyway if I ignored their letter, continued to wait for my full set of statements and then started a new claim for the full amount charged from my account over the last 6 years including the last 6 months I've already put the wheels in motion for?

 

I don't know - but it is good practice to reply to correspondance - after all that is what we are asking them to do. You could just accept the offer as partial settlement say you waiting for statements and will re assess amount you are cliaming when you recive them. In any event they will probably withdraw offer then.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A quick update.

 

Declined RBS's offer. They then wrote back (on the 14th day) stating they would offer me the full amount providing that it was in full and final settlement. Wrote back advising I would accept it but made it clear I would be taking similar action once I received my full statement history.

 

Funds were put in to my account today!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...