Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lasek22uk vs Lewisham NOW BAILIFFS INVOLVED **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Could you please help? Since 2009 I have an battle with Lewisham Council. In 2009 I parked

First of all I have left parking when the Enforcement officer issued a "penalty"...

Well they claim that he ISSUED ticekt but we actually left the place and he never gave us a ticekt! He was just taking pictures of me!

Since then no further letters communication. I thought no ticekt - no penalty but it looks like this is not the case.

I moved in 2010 to another property. Then they tracked me down. I have replied and asked for Evidence but they have only provided me with pictures etc. No copy of the ticket or not even a report from Enforcement Officer. When I contacted them again they told me that I need to pay otherwise they will take me to courts.

And here is now letter from Bailiffs... I dont know what to do next. I was not even a chance to see the evidence or defend myself in court...

 

Please help...

 

lasek

Link to post
Share on other sites

If bailiffs are involved, they are acting on a court warrant. You can challenge that warrant, and hopefully get it revoked. For now, forget the issue of the PCN itself - you need to deal with the bailiff warrant.

 

The council should have sent various notices out to the name and address held for that vehicle, at DVLA. Do you know if the name and address was correct? Do you know why you might not have received the notices?

 

The thing to do is file an out of time statutory declaration/witness statement. If you go to the website of Northampton County Court (also called TEC), then you can obtain the forms. Make sure you use "out of time" forms.

 

Complete them, send them off, and you have challenged the bailiff warrant. They should hold fire until the matter has been investigated. If your application is successful, the Council will contact you again about the original PCN. At that point you can go into the matter of whether it was issued - but not yet.

 

Post back if you need any help with the forms etc, or any more info about the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't do any harm, although they might ignore it. Better perhaps to contact the Council and tell them - they can tell the bailiff to hold fire for the moment. Problem is, the council probably will take ages to get around to dealing with a letter, so it might be pointless wrtiting! How about phoning the council's parking team and ask if you can speak to someone who deals with bailiff cases (someone in the council's parking section that is, not the bailiff themselves). Explain to them, and see if they will agree a temporary hold while you file the forms. There's a good chance they will.

 

If they won't, then get the forms done ASAP - once they are filed, they HAVE to suspend the warrant while the case is being considered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fill in this Te9 witness statement in web form,

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfi...forms/te9_e.pdf

 

tick the

 

'I did not receive the PCN/NTO'

 

Print it off, sign it, then scan it

 

fill in this

Statement out of Time/extension of time form stating

in the reasons box i.e change of address

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/HMCSCourtFinder/GetForm.do?court_forms_id=2362

 

again print it off sign and then scan it then

email both forms to the

HM courts customer service email address quoting the PCN in the subject line.

 

[email protected]

 

In the meantime if you have a garage make sure you leave your vehicle there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It MUST be remembered that in filing an Out of Time Application, the person merely has to provide a REASON why they are completing a Statutory Declaration LATE.

 

Therefore the wording needs to be something along the following lines:

 

" I was unable to complete this application within the given time as it was not until I received a letter from a firm of bailiffs that I was made aware that a warrant had been issued.

 

It would appear that all statutory notices had been sent to my previous address which was xxxxx. I moved from that address in approx xxx.

 

PS: You need to also ring TEC on 08457 045 007 and ask them to confirm the address on the warrant. If this is your old address, advise them that the bailiff is seeking to enforce a warrant at your NEW address!! They are NOT supposed to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much. I wrote to them as I was so upset about it. Here is response. They guy who toke a picture of me never gave me a penalty. We just drove off and that was it.. Moved to another place and bingo! The story was we parked for few minutes. When we arrived guy was taking pictures.. I can recall that no ticekt was even printed off!

 

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?b2afd83bbb.png

 

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?2ce0b03044.gif

 

I was told that if there is no evidence of ticekt on the windscree PCN is not valid? And I was leaving... I need to fill in those forms. Thanks all.. Shall I attach this to the Out of time application? What sort of arument I can use... As I said again. He had not a chance to attach ticket to windscreen..

Until today I havent seen original PCN..

 

Thank you again...

 

lasek

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so if they won't halt proceedings now, get on and file the witness statement as soon as you can.

 

 

I was told that if there is no evidence of ticekt on the windscree PCN is not valid?

 

 

That's not quite correct. If the PCN was not served, then it's not enforcable. However some are served by post, and since you didn't get any post, we can't say if that happened here. Also, it's not really a matter of whether there is "evidence" - you still need to go through the appeals process and argue the case.

 

 

Shall I attach this to the Out of time application? What sort of arument I can use... As I said again. He had not a chance to attach ticket to windscreen..

Until today I havent seen original PCN..

 

Forget the PCN for now! Don't even think about it - you need to challenge the bailiff warrant, not the PCN! That comes later. At the moment, you are challenging the warrant because you did not receive the NTO - and it's late because you had no mail. The issue of the PCN is not relevant to what you're doing right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The local authority applies to Northampton County Court for a warrant, which is routinely granted. It may be technically wrong to call it a court warrant, but its not helpful to state as fact that one does not exist! Bailiffs are instructed to act as a result of these warrants, and the fact that they are doing so in this case demonstrates that a warrant has been granted. He needs to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamberson - you can take it as fact that no warrant exists in thi case. There is a great deal of difference between the authorisation of a warrant by theTEC and the actual issuing of it.

 

As I say if LB Lewisham issued it, I'll give you the money mesself. Indeed I have yet to come across any London Authority which issues warrants, which is how we are successful in county courts when applying to get people's cars back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarcasm does not help you when you receive an answer to a question that you freely asked.

 

Learn the correct procedure for the issue of warrants by checking Civil Procedure Rule 75 (7) (3) and Section 5 (4) of the Enforcement Of Road Traffic Debts Order 1993 and you won't have to show your bemused displeasure in public after being corrected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't want to kid myself of any such thing as the evidence appears to show the contrary, but some might feel that the OP has been assisted by having a better understanding of how a warrant of execution is drawn up and why he has never seen one in this case.

 

Helping people is but one aspiration of the forum, it also exists for people to share their knowledge and to express their views.

 

Enough said - I shall now continue on preparing statements so that two people may apply to their respective County Courts next week for injunctions to get their cars back from bailiff companies whose employees took them after failing to turn up with warrants because the local authorities (Southwark and Newham) never issued them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear all...

Just had a conversation with people from TEC. They recived my paper work and they notified Lewisham Council.

I shall hear back from TEC withink 4 weeks.

 

That means that almighty bailifs need to stay away from my car and me?

 

Thanks to all:

 

Jamberson

cream70

tomtubby

Fair-Parking

 

 

lasek

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hey Folks!

Here is the latest:

 

On the 4th of June 2011 I went to do some shopping and when I returned my car was clamped. What a great surprise! This happend at TESCO.. and my car was clamped by a 'gentelman' who intruduced himself as a "North Hampton Court employee'. I almost had heart attack however I explain all etc and he said that he needs to check wit his office.. This office turned to be a Bailiff Office.. Here is lovely picture...Finally he unclamped me and he left...

Check this out:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/16/img00338201106041204.jpg/

 

 

Yesterday I was so happy as I recived letter from Northamton Courty Court :)

Please see below:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/34/penalty.jpg/

So thanks for help as I you all rescued me.. around 490£ (190£ penalty + 300£ Bailiff costs).

Looks like now need to wait for Lewisham response.. :(

 

I just wanna say thanks in million to all of you.. and once this is all over I will make honest donation to this forum.

 

lasek

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

So yesterday I recived letter from Lewisham demanding payment of £120.00.

 

http://imageshack.us/g/807/letterfromlewisham.png/

 

To give you idea what happened let me put everything again.

We went to Deptford Bridge in London. Parked in a area when you can park for 30 minutes. We knew that there is time limit so we returned to the car 25 minutes later (Still 5 minutes left). I was surprised that there was a guy from council walking around and taking notes. I said to him that we still have a plenty of time but he refused and he start taking my pictures and he also commented that is "To late..". We drove off. The ticket was not even issued yet..not even attached to windscreen - nothing..

 

What shall I do next? Many thanks for an advice...

 

lasek

 

 

 

 

 

Well they claim that he ISSUED ticekt but we actually left the place and he never gave us a ticekt! He was just taking pictures of me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was in 2009, right? So you can appeal on the basis that the time span is unreasonable. They cannot reasonably expect you to be able to defend the case after two years.

 

If you appeal on this basis, and they reject your appeal, you can apply for a hearing at adjudication. The same argument - too much time has elapsed - should win it for you and get the PCN cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...