Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

High Speed Two (HS2 Ltd) For or Against ??


Mr lex
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3941 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do you have any strong points of veiw or will the route will affect you, have your say here.

 

Did your MP go to the debate about High Speed Rail in March ?

 

It was held in Westminster Hall at the Houses of Parliament, on Thursday 31st March between 2.30 and 5.30

It’s was arranged by MPs Andrea Leadsom, Geoffrey Robinson, Dan Byles and Peter Bone. Geoffrey Robinson has come out against HS2 already – even though it does not pass through his constituency.

 

See the proposed route here :-

 

http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/in-your-area

 

The Consultaion Document on HS2 is here :-

 

http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/

 

Exceptional Hardship Scheme opens for applications

 

The Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS) for property owners affected by the proposed high speed rail line from London to Birmingham is open for applications

 

Property owners on, or in the vicinity of, HS2 Ltd’s recommended route - Route 3 - who urgently need to move, and would suffer exceptional hardship if they are unable to do so, can apply for the Government to buy their property at its full unblighted value.

 

For full details and application forms :-

 

http://www.hs2.org.uk/assets/x/64304

 

If you want to say 'NO' to HS2

 

http://stophs2.org/

 

If you support HS2

 

http://yestohs2.blogspot.com/2010/10/case-for-high-speed-2-hs2-answering.html

 

http://www.yestohs2.co.uk/

Edited by Mr lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone living in Birmingham I like the idea of a high-speed link to London. The problem is that we already have one!

 

The quick 'Pendolino' service can get from Birmingham International to Euston in 70 minutes or so (Weekdays), it's only another ten or so minutes from New Street station.

 

Do we actually need this line considering the poor shape our finances are currently in?

 

I have always loved travelling by train but feel that HS2 might be a waste of money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I live about 25 miles from Birmingham and would have to travel there first to use this line, and the 2 train journeys would take longer than the present journey to Marylebone. What's the betting that service would be cut though. No doubt that's a reason Geoffrey Robinson is against it though as it's likely to impact on the number of trains available to his constituents in Coventry. The only ones to benefit will be people in London and people in Birmingham - if they can afford the higher fares.

 

On top of the waste of money on the line at a time when so many cuts are being made, they're talking of a new station next to Birmingham International. Is there really the need for a new station when New Street is already being totally revamped?

 

Curious that it's being discussed in Parliament tomorrow when a full blown 6 month "consultation" has just started. So much money has been spent on it already I don't see a consultation at this late stage making a difference without one hell of a fight.

 

http://stophs2.org/

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am on the 'No' bus (or train whatever)

 

It would take a lot to get me to support this idea. My own views are that this vast amount of money would be better spent bringing other rail services up to date.

For to long, down here in the southwest, we have sat (or more likely stood,) on overcrowded, cold and 'late' trains.

 

RV

Q. What do you call someone who used to be really keen on tractors?

A. An extractor fan!

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am on the 'No' bus (or train whatever)

 

It would take a lot to get me to support this idea. My own views are that this vast amount of money would be better spent bringing other rail services up to date.

For to long, down here in the southwest, we have sat (or more likely stood,) on overcrowded, cold and 'late' trains.

 

RV

 

isnt that the truth.

 

Its nigh on impossible to get to London in time for a meeting on the train, a lot of people fly up from Newquay or Plymouth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the trains need investment and better services, and possibly even more tracks (maybe widen existing ones or reopen old lines), but I don't see why it all has to revolve around London?

 

I went to Birmingham International on Friday night and when I got to the station (a small country one) it had been pulled down. Money is clearly being spent to improve the platform and lots of work going on, but nowhere to buy tickets, so assumed we had to pay on the train. There was a collector but he took so long and we were only on for one stop so he didn't reach us and we had to get off before the train moved off again, so ended up not paying.

 

I couldn't help wondering if the benefit of savings from removing a manned station were lost by loss of revenue in unpaid fares. In this case it was less than a couple of quid but you get my point .....

 

On the way back we bought tickets for the journey back but again they weren't checked and there were no barriers so we could easily have got away without buying one. How long can they keep that up?

 

Sort out the current problems before spending £17 billion on another line to mess up.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

our local station is the same Caro.

 

yet, the last stop is one of those ticket zones, and if you get the connection there is no time to buy a ticket at that station... its all very dodgy.

 

the fares are very expensive, the train is crowded, where is all the money going?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Minister for Europe and MP for Aylesbury, David Lidington has called for a secret government report on HS2 to be made public.

 

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

18 bridges in West London will need to be replaced and Hanger Lane Gyratory rebuilt if HS2 goes ahead. Keni Brennan of HIllingdon Against HS2 & Stop HS2 is interviewed by Nick Ferrari on LBC radio.

 

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Isn't it strange that when HS1 was put out in the public domain, it went through 'on the nod'. Houses were demolished, listed buildings ended up within yards of the line, farms were broken up, and all because the politicians decided it. The public were kept in the dark, and those that did find out what was to happen, were told that it was in the public national interest to have it - so put up or shut up! All of this on top of the Channel Tunnel excavations and destruction. Even today people are still fighting for compensation after finding the 11.12pm out of St Pancras hammers past at 100mph+ just yards from their bedroom window at gone midnight where previously the only sound would have been the Barn Owl hooting away.

 

Now we are looking at HS2 and oh what a commotion there is. Same problems, but now going through the Tory heartlands. Is it to become the Beckhams v HS2?

 

Not in my backyard I hear said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...