Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Child Maintenance Rules


rozzadozza
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If I am correct im sure the rules of Child maintenance rules changed in April 2010, meaning if claiming Income support ...this would be disregarded by Housing Benefit, Income Support and Council Tax.

Before April 2010 the rules are that you are allowed to keep £20 whilst in reciept of Benefits...

Which brings me to asking my question....

I have been told that I may have incurred an Overpayment on Income support because they have not taken into account the maintenance I was recieving. Should this decision be based on the new rules or the old rules of Child maintenance and as I informed them by telephone...what grounds would I have to appeal this? I hope someone can help as they are trying to say I owe roughly three grand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've moved this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

  • Haha 1
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had similar issue where there was a change over period, whereas one minute the dwp were counting the maintenance as income, then not, but then they did again and now are not. I actually till that time had never received the payment from kids csa into my account, but when got it expected my income support to lessen if you see what i mean. Whereas before they just kept it at dwp.

 

Just to put that simply due to the new changes as of when the maintenance was to start as not counted the member of staff was a little confused I believe of when it was to be introduced.

 

I received the money and noticed it was not being taken account of re income support as per usual, so I rang them up.

 

I was told that it didnt count and to spend the money as I wished during a period where it did count I later realise and for some reason the system had started paying it to me rather than dwp take it. I rang them on two or three occasions to say are you sure this money is mine and each refering to the notes on my file, confirmed it was okay. The last woman I talked to had a distinctive voice and when I rang after receiving an overpayment letter said I thought I recodnised her voice.

 

Have to add I did believe them and spent the money and when received overpayment letter got very distressed.

 

She seemed anxious but still polite and I said I think it was you who told me to spend the money and enjoy and she said yes it was, I can see on file it was me. CHANCE OF THAT HEY? Any how she was lovely opened up and said there was some confusion but due to it being clearly not my fault I would not have to pay the overpayment back and I never heard of it again.

 

I did record the call of her telling me to spend the money and think that made the difference and offered to play it back, I was told it was not necessary.

 

Now if it wasnt just the lady who dealt with me it could have been a small period where the same error was told to others, as she wasnt the only rep I spoke to.

 

So I say when calling dwp record calls as they make mistakes too, but luckily were lovely and happy to admit it in my case.

 

 

Could you have had the same issue as me?

 

It related to a few months period I cant remember exactly when but it was the end of the year prior to when it officially was again stated the payment did not count as income, but this time officially.

 

I also incidently had over all this time not been paid my 10.00 then it changed to 20.00 a week that you were allowed to have not counted as income that entitled to. I kept getting letters saying soon you will get such and such extra but it never happened and this went on for some years as their dad has always paid csa and it went to dwp. But considering the overpayment was wiped I didnt take up the issue and didnt need the extra stress to be honest, was I now realise more concerned with not being as I panicked labelled a crim when I had done all I could xx Have to say I dont know wether it was written off due to them probably oweing me a similar amount or the original error but in any case it was.

 

Have to say since this happened have not had any csa or dwp problems. Just wondering wether they are chasing old overpayments and this issue has therefore just flagged up for you whereas I noticed something was what I thought wrong, not all would have I suppose xx

 

You need to record the call to them either by simply using mobile with record sound in entertainment bit as I used to and then moved on to a true call device that does it for me.

 

Would you have an old phone bill and could you trace the call that way as in get them to realise it is not your fault?

 

Thinking on it now wonder I recodnised her voice, I had recorded and relistened to it, hahahaha. Here was me thinking I had a better memory than I thought, schucks.xx

 

 

 

Best of luck xx

Edited by watchinginvestigation2011
Link to post
Share on other sites

With the DWP you can get away without having to pay back over payments. No such luck with the council. It was very nice of those child poverty people (I think it was them) who took DWP to court about that & won, but they failed to think of the people on housing benefit too, which lets face it, is quite often the same people as on income support :!:

Anyway, it depends when the over payment is for. They wont take into account the new rules going back before april 10 if that's what you're hoping. Only from april 10 up until now basically.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Erika and Mikey are experts in this field, they might post advice later, they helped me. I had diff user name then but due to memory problems after seizures have forgot the email and passwords relating to that ID :( Though my thread might ring a bell :)

 

Note to self write down my username and pword in diary this time :oops::oops:

Edited by watchinginvestigation2011
Link to post
Share on other sites

It changed for HB/CTB in 2008 and for other benefits (such as IS) in 2010.

 

They will use the legislation that applied at the time for the period they are questioning. So, if they say the overpayment was made from 1/8/8 to 1/8/9 they will calculate the child support as income. If there is an overpayment they then need to consider whether the overpayment is recoverable. If you informed them that you were receiving child support payments from the moment you began to receive them, you have not failed to disclose a material fact or misrepresented your claim therefore any overpayment is not recoverable.

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It changed for HB/CTB in 2008 and for other benefits (such as IS) in 2010.

 

They will use the legislation that applied at the time for the period they are questioning. So, if they say the overpayment was made from 1/8/8 to 1/8/9 they will calculate the child support as income. If there is an overpayment they then need to consider whether the overpayment is recoverable. If you informed them that you were receiving child support payments from the moment you began to receive them, you have not failed to disclose a material fact or misrepresented your claim therefore any overpayment is not recoverable.

 

If that happens do they still always notify you of the overpayment, even if it's not recoverable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may do, though I don't know if it's something that they have to do. Though DWP cannot insist on recovering an overpayment which arose as a result of official error, an overpayment can be repaid voluntarily if the claimant wishes to do so. I've dealt with some cases where claimants have made their own arrangements to repay voluntarily. It isn't common, not something I've seen a lot of, usually it is the older generation who insist on voluntary repayments from what I've seen.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll use the original version, i was overpaid £3 a week for a year, as they had £23 month not week on their computer system, even though I told them it was per week and then when in an interview told them of their error when she was checking my details with me so they sent me a letter then showing how I have to pay my overpayment back. I had a letter the DAY AFTER lol, changing their child maintenance rules. I thought, wow just my luck. What a kick in the teeth lol. For £3 a week, that I assumed was automatically being taken out of my IS.

But yeah, the version of when you claimed, is the legislation they use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It changed for HB/CTB in 2008 and for other benefits (such as IS) in 2010.

 

They will use the legislation that applied at the time for the period they are questioning. So, if they say the overpayment was made from 1/8/8 to 1/8/9 they will calculate the child support as income. If there is an overpayment they then need to consider whether the overpayment is recoverable. If you informed them that you were receiving child support payments from the moment you began to receive them, you have not failed to disclose a material fact or misrepresented your claim therefore any overpayment is not recoverable.

 

Thanks Erica for your invaluable advice...this will really help me with sorting out my situation. I have not been told yet how much the overpayment will be as of yet. The worse case Im looking at is paying it pack....although I notictified them and feel it's there error as I informed them by telephone..im going to have a sturggle prooving it. (unfortunately)! The worry of it not affecting housing benefit was my big concern as the last thing I need is rent arrears on top of an OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had similar issue where there was a change over period, whereas one minute the dwp were counting the maintenance as income, then not, but then they did again and now are not. I actually till that time had never received the payment from kids csa into my account, but when got it expected my income support to lessen if you see what i mean. Whereas before they just kept it at dwp.

 

Just to put that simply due to the new changes as of when the maintenance was to start as not counted the member of staff was a little confused I believe of when it was to be introduced.

 

I received the money and noticed it was not being taken account of re income support as per usual, so I rang them up.

 

I was told that it didnt count and to spend the money as I wished during a period where it did count I later realise and for some reason the system had started paying it to me rather than dwp take it. I rang them on two or three occasions to say are you sure this money is mine and each refering to the notes on my file, confirmed it was okay. The last woman I talked to had a distinctive voice and when I rang after receiving an overpayment letter said I thought I recodnised her voice.

 

Have to add I did believe them and spent the money and when received overpayment letter got very distressed.

 

She seemed anxious but still polite and I said I think it was you who told me to spend the money and enjoy and she said yes it was, I can see on file it was me. CHANCE OF THAT HEY? Any how she was lovely opened up and said there was some confusion but due to it being clearly not my fault I would not have to pay the overpayment back and I never heard of it again.

 

I did record the call of her telling me to spend the money and think that made the difference and offered to play it back, I was told it was not necessary.

 

Now if it wasnt just the lady who dealt with me it could have been a small period where the same error was told to others, as she wasnt the only rep I spoke to.

 

So I say when calling dwp record calls as they make mistakes too, but luckily were lovely and happy to admit it in my case.

 

 

Could you have had the same issue as me?

 

It related to a few months period I cant remember exactly when but it was the end of the year prior to when it officially was again stated the payment did not count as income, but this time officially.

 

I also incidently had over all this time not been paid my 10.00 then it changed to 20.00 a week that you were allowed to have not counted as income that entitled to. I kept getting letters saying soon you will get such and such extra but it never happened and this went on for some years as their dad has always paid csa and it went to dwp. But considering the overpayment was wiped I didnt take up the issue and didnt need the extra stress to be honest, was I now realise more concerned with not being as I panicked labelled a crim when I had done all I could xx Have to say I dont know wether it was written off due to them probably oweing me a similar amount or the original error but in any case it was.

 

Have to say since this happened have not had any csa or dwp problems. Just wondering wether they are chasing old overpayments and this issue has therefore just flagged up for you whereas I noticed something was what I thought wrong, not all would have I suppose xx

 

You need to record the call to them either by simply using mobile with record sound in entertainment bit as I used to and then moved on to a true call device that does it for me.

 

Would you have an old phone bill and could you trace the call that way as in get them to realise it is not your fault?

 

Thinking on it now wonder I recodnised her voice, I had recorded and relistened to it, hahahaha. Here was me thinking I had a better memory than I thought, schucks.xx

 

 

 

Best of luck xx

 

It sounds like you were very lucky to get good results...I have no recordings...so no such luck here! Thanks, Erica replied at the bottom on this thread. It was at an IUC that evidence was provided which included bank transfers between my ex account and mine ( LTAHAW)- Not the case but another story. It was mentioned to my solicitor that this £80 if child maintenance was not being taken into account :( Despite my notifying them. Just happy as it's just IS and not HB & CT benefit aswell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll use the original version, i was overpaid £3 a week for a year, as they had £23 month not week on their computer system, even though I told them it was per week and then when in an interview told them of their error when she was checking my details with me so they sent me a letter then showing how I have to pay my overpayment back. I had a letter the DAY AFTER lol, changing their child maintenance rules. I thought, wow just my luck. What a kick in the teeth lol. For £3 a week, that I assumed was automatically being taken out of my IS.

But yeah, the version of when you claimed, is the legislation they use.

 

Sod's Law!!! If it's any consolation by the sounds of it im going to owe about 3k, despite my phonecalls :( Not good lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope it turns out ok for you both. It's a right headache isn't it.

Bring on the universal credit I say, although it'll be too late for some of us (I have mid teens already) but at least it'll be easier for people claiming in the future. The errors are reaching epic levels, my local rag came through the door yesterday with an article saying our local council had 838k worth of over payments last year.

Well ironically they have 1200 quid of that back off me so far this year! Busy year ahead for them to get the rest ey..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...