Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help with Royal Bank of Scotland/MoorCroft CCA Request Reply


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a Royal bank of scotland credit card which i have missed payments on this has now been passed to Moorcroft for collection. The credit card account has been open for about 10-15 years now maybe more. I ran into difficulty paying it etc etc etc and lost track of the account and royal bank of scotland have now passed it on to Moorcroft.

I was advised to send a CCA Request to moorcroft to which i did and they have replied i have uploaded the letter they sent me. Can somebody please advise me what to do next?

 

Thank you for your time in advance

 

John

Letter from moorcroft.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

JW Yes,titled "Failure to provide a copy of the agreement within the prescribed timescale",,the 14 days have expired since you made the CCA request,the fact they cannot produce an agreement and they have put this in writing,is their problem.

 

Some of the threats in the Moorcroft letter will contravene the failure to supply an agreement,such as you must continue to pay and the debt will be registered with a Credit Agency,Remind them any action of this nature will be viewed as a complete OFT guideline avoidance and will drawn to the attention of the OFT should they see fit to ignore the guidelines.

 

I am of the school debts should be paid but on your terms and if they are unable to comply with your legal requests,then it should be very much on your terms.

 

all the best FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have a look at re-claiming charges also, there must be a few.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi and thanks for all your help, in the end RBS have come back with a response to my CCA request i cannot see a correct cca with a signature anywhere within the documents.. can somebody have a look and let me know what to do next? I would be most grateful

 

Thanks Jon

RBSredact.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

JW Hi.read through your attached files,under the current legislation if this ended up in court(not suggesting it will) I do not think you would win,OK no agreement with signature,however there is sufficient documentation to confirm an account exists and payments have been made,Sorry.

 

There must be charges that you can claim back plus any PPI involved?

 

If you do not have all of the statements you will need to send a SAR,if you have all the statements as Maroondev said in an earlier thread No8 add the charges up and reclaim.

 

regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

JW Hi,enforcement of CCA has been the subject of many threads,that have got heated at times.

 

Although in your case they cannot produce an agreement with a signature,they can prove you have used the account and made payments,and in the vast majority of cases that end up in court the fact that the OC cannot produce a signed agreement is being ignored(the guidelines state no signed agreement no case)or words to that effect.

 

The OCs and DCAs are aware of this and are being really difficult.If you are going to make an offer of payments,you need only pay what you can honestly afford,if you are considering a F&F offer this is a different situation,you need to be really careful on how you word the offer.

 

If you have a F&F in mind lets us know

 

regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...