Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

sons RBS card CCJ, now Incasso have a CO..hes stil paying ..can he move..


CG7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello some advice please.......My son got a judgement about 4 months ago for a loan he had with RBS after defaulting on an arrangement he had previously made with them (there was many reasons for this)

 

it was put into the hands of incasso and he continued to bury his head in the sand. anyway incasso said that a charge has also been put on his property without is knowledge using some court that was over 100 miles away or so they say.

 

What i would like to know is can a charge be put on a property when it was for an unsecured personal loan and what is the worst case scenario for him and his family.

 

What is a charge and can they make him sell if he can't make the payments (all his overtime has been stopped indefinately at the moment) and he is obviously worried.

 

Kind Regards,

 

cg

Edited by CG7
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly all above board, and increasingly frowned on by courts. If the judgment is for under £9000 it is highly unlikely he will be forced to sell his house.

 

In other ways, CO's are not bad things as interest and charges are automatically frozen and the company only gets its money when he sells his house. Say the judgment was for £4000 and he doesn't sell his house for 15 years. Inflation will have devalued £4000 to probably the equivalent of £1000 now.

 

There are no guarantees, but judges really are very reluctant to force people to sell their houses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tingy and thanks for replying - I was beginning to think i was going to have to bump the thread because I hadn't had a reply from anyone.

 

My son is paying £550 a month to them at the moment but his overtime has stopped and he is really worried that he wont be able to meet the payments - what would happen in that case scenario, would he have to go back to court do you know.

 

he seems to think that if he pays it off and the judgement is satisfied then the judgement will be removed, but i dont think it quite works like that does it ?

 

How many years will the judgement be on his credit file for and can you tell me what happens to the charge on the property and is it automatically discharged..

 

Anyway many thanks for your reply....

 

cg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cerberserlert

 

If the judgement is marked as satisfied will that make a difference to him being able to move house if he wanted to before the six year period ends or will he still have to wait the full term of six years.

 

What happens to the charge that incasso have on it. will he receive some paperwork to say its been taken off his property, I have no idea how it all works.

 

Many thanks,

 

cg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll write in red purely to make it stand out from your writing!

 

Hi Tingy and thanks for replying - I was beginning to think i was going to have to bump the thread because I hadn't had a reply from anyone.

 

My son is paying £550 a month to them at the moment but his overtime has stopped and he is really worried that he wont be able to meet the payments - what would happen in that case scenario, would he have to go back to court do you know. I am not an expert on courts, but I believe if he cannot afford the current repayments he can apply to the court to have them looked at and changed.

 

he seems to think that if he pays it off and the judgement is satisfied then the judgement will be removed, but i dont think it quite works like that does it ?

You're right! The judgment will me marked as satisfied and will stay on his CRF for 6 years, then fall off.

How many years will the judgement be on his credit file for and can you tell me what happens to the charge on the property and is it automatically discharged..

Answered above - 6 years - and yes, the CO will just disappear. Double check this, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't have to apply to have it removed.

Anyway many thanks for your reply...

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi all,

I need advice for my son regarding a charge that was put on his property a few years ago due to a credit card with RBS

who then sold it on to incasso and he has been paying it off every month. he is now down to around a thousand or so.

 

Last week he asked incasso for a settlement figure and he offered £650 but they asked for £850

and also said that if he only pays them £650 the judgement/charge would only be partly settled on his credit file and not wholly settled.

 

Any thoughts please.....too me its not worth paying anything extra off if they are not going to remove the judgment/charge from his property and credit file.

 

What do you think he should do.

 

cg7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will try and find someone who can answer this question for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.......

 

something smells here.

 

did IC go back to the court and get it transfered to them?

 

have they ever metioned they know it has a CCJ?

 

how was this negotiation done

 

not on the phone i hope.?

 

who is shown as the OWNER of the debt n the CRA, IC or the OC?

 

is there a clear record of the su reucing on the CRA file since paying IC?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all - my son today received another letter from Incasso "we write in connection with the above matter and further to previous telephone conversations. We note the contents of the conversations and acknowledge receipt of the £600 settlement offer. We are currently seeking our clients instructions in respect of the figure and will revert back to you upon receipt of these instructions.

 

They also said that if he pays the 800 pounds, the charge will be wiped off straight away but if he only pays the 600 pounds he will have to wait another 6 weeks, is this correct or are they just trying it on, it sounds very fishy to me. what do you think.....

 

cg

Link to post
Share on other sites

very fishy!!

 

something smells big time here.

 

whos name is against the debt on his CRA file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - that i don't know but he is going to check his credit file tomorrow.

 

I am looking at a B132 notice from the Land Registry. to enter an agreed notice and it says that the application was lodged by Incasso Llp of Leeds. on behalf of The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. but all of this happened a couple of years ago now.

 

How long will this charge/judgement stay on his credit file once it is paid off ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

6yrs

the charge itself is never shown on the cra file, i think?

 

but the CCJ will for 6yrs

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx - is it 6 years from the date of the judgement or from when it is paid off.

 

also is it true that if they reach an amicable settlement figure that is short of the existing balance, will it go on his credit file that he hasn't paid it all off and what would be the outcome for him.

 

cg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very much inclined to not touch this with a barge pole........out of my depth here I'm afraid, but it just doesn't sit right with me at all, they're up to something???

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes my thoughts too.

 

never short settle

 

something really smells

 

no-one ofers a discount if they can get the whole cigar.

 

my answer to anyone that gets offered a discount is ignore.

 

however in this instance, diff to call.

 

get that cra file

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

 

.My son has received a letter today from Incasso saying that his client's are not willing to accept the Full and Final settlement offer of £700. This is due to the offer being to low in comparison with the outstanding balance.

 

Our client has advised that they would be willing to accept £870 in Full and Final settlement of the above matter and this offer is only valid for 30 days.

 

Do you think he should accept or make another offer to meet them half way on the settlement figure.

 

With it saying Full and Final Settlement. will it still have the "P" on his credit file as opposed to Satisfied.

 

What do you think he should do ?

 

Thanks....cg

Link to post
Share on other sites

that means partal settlement

might as well burn the money!

for all the good it will do.

 

get his cra please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the debt itself shows

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the CCJ listed too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...