Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I Dont Believe It! I Won!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I am probrably being thick:confused: but I cannot find the 2nd letter to send to bank - the one after the preliminary one? A & L have - not surprisingly - denined the charges are illegal saying the OFT was referring only to Credit Card charges, and I now want to send the second letter giving them a further 14 days to reflect.. Smil however have magically credited my account £133.37 - the last lot of charges - without advising me.... but I want them ALL back. They are the worst bank for applying charges but do not let you know you have gone over limit so the charges just built up without my knowing! Anyway many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

REFUNDED

Hubbys - HSBC £4,165 paid 18/8 after MCOL issued :)

HSBC - £651 paid 18/8 after MCOL issued :)

HSBC - £147 Prel 7/8, LBA 21/8, MCOL 6/9 £241

Hubby Halifax - Prel 29/7 £215, LBA 21/8, Offer rec. £110 22/8, MCOL 6/9 £298

Abbey - £2758 - Prel 26/6, LBA 10/7 - MCOL 26/7 £3,391, offer 25/8 £1,755.94, paid £3567.32 after Case manag hearing

Barclays - £675 Prel7/8, LBA 21/8, offer received £300 MCOL 6/9 £998 - Paid £1,012 before going to Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A & L have - not surprisingly - denied the charges are illegal saying the OFT was referring only to Credit Card charges, and I now want to send the second letter giving them a further 14 days to reflect..

 

Just in case you are not aware, A&L have stated publicly that they wiil close the accounts of customers who claim against them. Make sure you have a parachute account handy!:)

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent DPA letter end of May and it took right to the limit for the huge pile to arrive! Prelimary letter sent 24th July, received response saying OFT ruling didnt apply on Saturday 28th - speedy or what? and the obviously send that letter to everyone! LBA letter sent today so I will keep you posted! I am claiming £633 - pity it could not be more then 6 years!

 

good luck to everyone!

 

Parachute deployed and fully working!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi ... I am just about to issue my first MCOL and just wondered how I send my schedule of charges? Is there a way of attaching the spreadsheet... or do I wait until I get a written acknowledgement and send it then? I am scared witless and convinced I will have to be the first person to go to court! BUT if that is what it takes I will go with as much media coverage as I can possibly muster up!:? Thanks in anticipation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, I'm just filling in mine at this moment and I'm sure I'll be dragged through the court. :) We'll be fine.

 

I'm sure I saw that once you get your reference number you send the schedule in.

 

Just about to hit the submit button and pay. Have you got that far?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont wanna rush it... gotta pop up hospital to visit my 18 year old cos she had op on hip,, will do it nice and thoroughly this evenin... good luck to us both... I am taking on Smile... only had account 9 months and they charged me £649! They were SO sneaky!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bettynomates

 

I submitted my A&L claim on-line on 16th August. I haven't submitted the schedule showing every detail cos I sent that to the bank 28 days ago.

 

However, I had a similar problem with lloyds when I submitted my claim on-line and this was clearly reflected in Lloyds' solicitor's defence when they said my claim 'was not clear' - Lloyds had obviously not forwarded on my back-up schedule. So, I duly sent two copies to the court when I sent back my Allocation Questionnaire - one for them and one for Lloyds' solicitors.

 

At least the on-line claim allows you to break down your claim to the total amount (whatever that is), plus 8% interest and costs. If they want more detail and the bank haven't passed it on, they'll ask for it.

 

Without putting my head above the parapet, I had read somewhere that an A&L employee had publicly said they didn't wish to go to court and have no intention of declaring their costs in a court case.

 

BYW - it seems that SMILE are the best for paying back quickly - almost before you've had a chance to send the second letter! So good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi... just nervously completing online moneyclaim form but not sure what I should put in for the daily interest rate under that part of the claim?? Any help gratefully and nervously received..... will I be the first person to have to court??? eek! Dont let me back out now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

daily rate is worked out by taking the amount of charges,multiply by interest rate ie .8% , divide by 365 = daily interest.EG £100 * .8 / 365 =£0.21p

hope this helps:)

Rbs £114 + contractual at 29.84% I won total=£125 no laughing it's a win

Don't moan about it DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think the daily rate is worked out like this

 

total of charges + 8% interest x 0.00022 = daily interest rate

 

thats how i've done it

A&L Data Protection Act sent 8/6/2006 - Statements received 27/7 - Prelim request for payment sent 28/7 - LBA sent 8/8 - MCOL 21/8 - Settled in full £3317.66 20/9:lol:

MBNA Data Protection Act sent 8/8 - 14/9 Offer of £2,247.35 accepted. (£1,160 charges plus compound interest). Second account = offer of £1,182.30 (£436 charges plus compound interest) :lol:

Morgan Stanley Data Protection Act sent 8/8:) Total of £875 charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merged all your threads Betty as it is easier to follow your progress if you keep everything together.

 

By the way, daily rate is 0.00022%. Those extra zeros are very important.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - i've just registered and am totally lost - so don't know why but this reply box popped up so Hello there. I too am with Alliance & leicester and hopefully will get my charges back. Every month they are wacking £25 or more for going overdrawn even if its the day my wages go in. Wish I never changed from Natwest.

 

I am trying to get the ball rolling by sending the first initial letter and cannont find the first letter template, can you help?

 

many thanks

 

Karen May

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in case you are not aware, A&L have stated publicly that they wiil close the accounts of customers who claim against them. Make sure you have a parachute account handy!:)

 

Elsinore

 

wow, thats just so bad, and it appears they are opening themselves up to more legal action, it would seem they are trying to 'defame or disadvantage you as a result of you exercising your legal rights'.

 

i just have to past MrAngrys post here (our local Cable Forum top class man in these matters)

and hope the legal eagles reading this can clarify his outline for me and the other readers here, im a little unsure were i might put the warning text to the A&L bank to make them reconsider or in the event cover my self for later.

 

my biggest problem is that the reason i ended up with an A&L phone banking account in the first place was because my credit in non existent and the only other account i could get was a post office account that doesnt not do any form of DD that i need for my ntl internet account ( they wont let you open an ntl broadband account without paying by DD, hence disadvantaged people cant easly get online and stay there).

 

 

heres his post

Reclaim Your Bank And Card Charges - Page 6 - Cable Forum

"

07-06-2006, 20:55 #85 Mr Angry

Re: Reclaim Your Bank And Card Charges

For those taking (or considering) legal action to recover charges:

 

It is a wise move to open an account with somewhere like the Woolwich before you take your current bank to the cleaners. The Woolwich are "pretty cool" about new customers and don't do credit checks on many new customer accounts (depending on the type of account facility required). With many new accounts they also offer to rearrange all your Direct Debits, Standing Orders etc free of charge for you.

 

Some banks are getting a bit stroppy with customers who successfully claim (ie. everyone who has claimed to date) and are closing some successful applicants accounts. The legality of such actions are currently being looked into and I'm pretty sure that they'll have to stop doing this in the near future or face further legal action from customers (if not Government - who are hell bent on everyone having a bank account so they can keep tabs on all of us).

 

There is no legal (or logical) argument for any bank to close an account simply because the account holder has won a claim against them. The argument most commonly put forward is that the bank feel that the account is not "profitable" or "incorrectly managed". This is an interesting, if fundamentally flawed, defence of their actions.

 

Over the past few years the Government (bless 'em) have moved over 93% of benefit payments to BACS / EFT and benefit receipients must have a bank account to receive payments. Additionally, benefit receipient accounts are, on instruction from Government, to be treated differently from the accounts of working individuals in order that the socially disadvantaged are not further penalized by bank charges.

 

This raises the issues of equality and discrimination (yes, the old chestnut of human rights). I'm personally involved with two current cases where the plaintiffs have threatened (legitimately) to sue their banks for theft after they won back their charges, costs, and interest and their banks closed their accounts.

 

Guess what? Once the banks realized that charging illegal penalty fees was now the least of their worries and that people were prepared to instigate criminal proceedings for theft they quickly backed down and offered (sorry, "begged") the plaintiffs to reopen their accounts and let bygones be bygones. Neither plaintiff has taken them up on their offer and are currently considering proceeding with the theft charges.

 

Generally speaking if you take action against your bank for illegal charges it is worth mentioning to them in your letter before action that any attempt to defame or disadvantage you as a result of you exercising your legal rights will result in further legal action.

 

I find this works a treat since once they receive their summons in respect of the illegal charges you can pretty much rest assured that they'll get the message that you're quite prepared to go to court in the event that they do defame or disadvantage you as a result of you deciding to do so.

 

Be advised though that 99% of banks do not "roll over" once you threaten action, 99% do not roll over once you issue proceedings, 99% will drag on until the day of the hearing trying to wear you down or brow beat you with legalese and fancy letterheaded missives from their elected counsel. There is an upside though - 99.9% of them, to date, have paid up. The one exception being Lloyds who in one case used a cunning (see: lowdown / sneaky) interprative distraction which, if they attempted to use it again, would be entirely ineffective

 

Inspiration for all

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/5043154.stm

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian_j...524077,00.html

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/4810490.stm

 

http://www.lindum-marketing.com/pena...ess-120206.gif

"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi K Webber, Firstly you need to start your own thread otherwise things can get a little confusing. And secondly, you definitely definitely need to read the FAQ's. Once you've read the FAQ's i would suggest that you read as much on this forum as you possibly can, there is always somebody willing to help but you have to try to help yourself a bit as well.

 

Good Luck

A&L Data Protection Act sent 8/6/2006 - Statements received 27/7 - Prelim request for payment sent 28/7 - LBA sent 8/8 - MCOL 21/8 - Settled in full £3317.66 20/9:lol:

MBNA Data Protection Act sent 8/8 - 14/9 Offer of £2,247.35 accepted. (£1,160 charges plus compound interest). Second account = offer of £1,182.30 (£436 charges plus compound interest) :lol:

Morgan Stanley Data Protection Act sent 8/8:) Total of £875 charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merged all your threads Betty as it is easier to follow your progress if you keep everything together.

 

By the way, daily rate is 0.00022%. Those extra zeros are very important.

 

I believe that you will find that the calculation for the daily rate is the amount x 0.00022 per day for the statutory interest, not 0.00022%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"my biggest problem is that the reason i ended up with an A&L phone banking account in the first place was because my credit in non existent and the only other account i could get was a post office account that doesnt not do any form of DD that i need for my ntl internet account" - (DAVIDM POST)

Spotted what you said about your credit file. You will find absolution and complete relief (hopefully) in the thread 'Default Hell' under the 'Legalities' forum. I am currently changing my complete credit file and you have incredible powers under basic contract law and statute law - there are even a few templates to use within the thread. It is a good 9-pages long and you do need to read it from the beginning - don't pick up half way through, as even though the first part may not apply to you, believe me, it develops into all sorts of problems people have with their credit file companies! In a nutshell, they're not allowed to hold data on you if you've finished the loan/severed the contract with the original creditor. Plus, you are entitled to remove your information from the automated system (which all financial institutions use) - but read it for yourself. Get a beer first and good luck. :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that you will find that the calculation for the daily rate is the amount x 0.00022 per day for the statutory interest, not 0.00022%.

 

Doh - quite right. Sorry for the misinformation but the extra zeros point stands.:)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...