Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO chasing 3 CITI Loans + **WON PPI**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recieved letter today from a company called HFO Service after a large amount of Money for a alleged loan to a bank.

 

I have seen on here that I will need, in order to get things sorted, send them some letters in order to make sure all is kosher ( requiring evidence which according to some threads on here they are unlikely to have)

 

I just want to make sure I get everything correct and not make any rookie mistakes.

 

Can someone help please with what letters I must send etc , to whom and when? If i can give you any more information please ask I would be eternally grateful.

 

As an aside their manner has been harrassing when they have called, bombarding my mobile, work number and flat mate with many calls, what can i do to stop this too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 309
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i'd hang fire on doing anything

 

can you give us a bit more history on what you think this is about.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX, sure can give you any information you d like! they say its for an old loan taken out in 2005 and defaulted in 2007.

 

Reading through other posts on here I guess I should be sending the original loan company one letter with a PO and one for HFO asking for a copy of signed credit agreement and also one to stop phone harrassment, correct?

 

As an aside, are they really allowed to charge %interest on this ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

when was YOUR last financial in/out on it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

told who by?

 

not being funny but you need to confirm this yourself and not take what some muppet dca is saying as the truth.

 

HFO are bottom feeders and this A/C will prob be already writtren off years ago by the OC, and has been brought on a phishing list

 

if you have never had any letters from the OC over the last 2 yrs then pers i'd ignore it.

 

if it was 'deaulted' in june 2007, i'd guess it would have been 3-4mts before that you made your last payment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks DX, how would i confirm the default / last payment date?

 

Looking at posts on here ( trying to work things out for myself and not just ask) on the same and similar companies, am i right in thinking I would need a SAR to the original company and Consumer Credit Act Request to HFO?

 

Is this right? I also would like to send a letter re telephone harrassment too to ensure they only contact me in writing.

 

Wouldnt want to just just "ignore" this as I don't think it would go away but on the flip side wouldnt want to do the wrong thing!

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you click on the library tab at the top of the page it will take you to the telephoe harrassment letter.

At this stage I would just SAR the OC it should include any agreement.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have had no other letteres on this debt in two-three years i would ignore them totally.

 

writing will only place a marker on your file that a mug awaits.

 

and it will still leave you on a phishing list, and the next leecher will still do the same as 'bad news' letters are not fwded on with the debt when it is brought in the next list, else it wouldn't be worth buying.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not in the least we love these letters

 

total garbage

 

no cca = np pay

 

bye bye fleecers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for your views, did you get to see both letters ( before one was rightly removed)?

 

if so in your opinion I should just ignore these and only take action IF they decided to go to court? If so how can i avoid them calling my flatmate, my mobile no ( which they tricked out of him) and my work address?

 

thanks again guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

all i can suggest is to read around

type in HFO in our advanced search and read some posts

you'll soon get the idea.

 

as for the unlawful contact going on to the world and his cat to try and fleece you

pers i'd complaint to everyone you can

particularly the trading standards of the area they are based in.

 

ignore them and DO NOT contact them.

 

you could fire off the telephone harrassment letter etc

but pers i'd not, just complaint to whoever you think it necessary too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threat-o-gram

 

toilet paper

 

if, could, might, maybe, instructed................snoreeeeeeeeeee.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its probable they will try sneak it into northampton, you will receive from N'mpton notification when you get this just enter you intend to fully defend this case, then it has to be transfered to your local court , till then just send a harrassment notice also if they are harrassing you with phone calls and sending photo's then send copies to OFT and Google

patrickq1

otherwise as DX has said ignore them until the time comes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...