Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Current council tax problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

i have a question hope you can help.

 

I have 3 months council tax arrears for current year (£300) - Its gone to bailiffs now and council dont want to know.

 

Im paying out 127 a month to bailffs - they said that i owe the whole year upto april 2011!

 

Im due to move house beginning of oct as my lease on this one expires.

 

Can anyone tell me what happens please - will i end up paying this ones for whole year and my new one?

 

I did offer to pay the council the £300 i owe but they said i cant pay it now and i have to keep paying the 127 a month till next year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

i have a question hope you can help.

 

I have 3 months council tax arrears for current year (£300) - Its gone to bailiffs now and council dont want to know.

 

Im paying out 127 a month to bailffs - they said that i owe the whole year upto april 2011!

 

Im due to move house beginning of oct as my lease on this one expires.

 

Can anyone tell me what happens please - will i end up paying this ones for whole year and my new one?

 

I did offer to pay the council the £300 i owe but they said i cant pay it now and i have to keep paying the 127 a month till next year!

 

Unfortunately the Liability Order the Council have will be for the balance of the current year up until 31 March2011 and it is this figure the Bailiffs will be enforcing on. When you move you will then be able to apply for a rebate if you have paid by then.

 

A way forward on this is to contact your local Councillor and appraise them of the situation.

 

How have you arranged to pay the £127 to the Bailiffs? Have they been in your house or otherwise seized/levied any goods?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

No the bailiffs havent been round, i called them before they did!

 

I have had to pay the £127 today, as its due 1st of every month. They gave me 4 days to get money together.

Then charged me £3.40 because i didnt have time to set up on standing order and had to pay on my debit card!!!

 

When i move - ie october, i will have made 3 payments, which as council tax will be accumilating at a monthly rate for those 3 months, i guess i wont have paid enough to cover the arrears.

 

So will the bailiffs just want whats left of the balance on this place or will they add my new house council tax onto it?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The full amount for the year only becomes payable on paper. The council has full discreation on collection and you should have asked for a payment plan.

 

Have you had the biliffs fees in writing? you are entitled to this and if you don't get one then they are likely to up the fee beyond what the regulations say they can charge for collection.

 

Work out on what date the paying of £127 will bring an end to this years (2010/2011) liability, you mustn't pay over the odds.

 

Also be aware that your bill next year wont include any arrears, if there are any, from this year, but payments made after April 2011 will firstly be for the arrears and then that years council tax. This is done purely to allow them to get another liability order against you so they can again add on the rip-off supposed court fee.

 

It would seem they have followed in Gordon Browns footsteps (or on his orders) and found a way of upping council tax by stealth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did ask for a payment plan, the council refused. I rang 3 times and pretty much begged them, but they said there was nothing they could do - its at the bailiffs and that was that.

Iv had no paperwork from the bailiffs, i asked them yesterday (when i made payment and they said they had sent it on 27 july! but to date i havent received any)

I dont know how much im paying - no one has told me, but original payments was £100 month, before it was sent to bailiffs.

 

I questioned the council on the phone, as i know someone in same position - had current year passed to bailiffs and is moving house in aug......The council have taken hers back from bailiffs!!

 

I mentioned this on phone to council, they said that they dont take accounts back from the bailiffs anymore, this must have been an oversight on their part, but they still wouldnt take mine back! Shes paying £120 month and her house banding is higher than mine (im in band b and shes in d).

 

I cant understand it all

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll put it in plain language in case the council comes on here and has a read - the council are liars - they can take it back just can't be bothered all they are interested in is 'give us your money' but I have to pay for my xx funeral - I don't care dump them out the back and give us the money.

 

Councils really are arseholes and don't give a damn about anyone even if it means life or death. To prove that point, they are going more and more to the bankruptcy court, they would rather chuck you out on the street than give you time to pay.

 

Sorry - rant over.

 

Send them a Subject Access Request (£10), they don't like them as it involves them in some work. They have to send you everything they have on you within 12 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make them do some work for a change. Ring the Council in the morning and ask:

1 - how much the Liability Order is for

2 - how much is still outstanding

3 - what period of time it covers

4 - when it was passed to the Bailiffs.

 

The responses you have had from the Council are typical, unfortunately you mainly get to speak only with those at the bottom of the tree - they have a script to follow, those further up the trough can make life easier but usually prefer to bury their heads in the sand. A lot of Councils now outsource their administration work - one such Company that take this on are called Equita and it just so happens they own a Bailiff Company called Equita - therefore sometimes you are not talking to the Council.

 

Is there anything in your circumstances that may be worth listening to - benefits or illness for example, for yourself or anyone in the household.

 

Next thing is to ask the Bailffs for a breakdown of the charges they have applied. Here's a letter - use and adapt as you see fit - send by email and follow up with a copy in the post using RM Signed For:

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account. Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges applied.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

You could also involve your local Councillor(s) - details usually on Council website or ask by phone. You can also pay the Council direct using their online facility or automated phone - guaranteed to upset the Bailiff if you do this but you do have to be mindful of what fees you may be due to pay as the Council are obliged to pay the Bailiffs fees first.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the liability order was issued the whole year became payable immediately. The council should have made you aware that you were in arrears before just sending an account to the bailiffs, at which stage you would have been able to make an arrangement to pay them back, did you get anything from them? Definitely send them the letters that ploddertom laid out. Once the account has been referred to bailiffs the debt is 'theirs' meaning all payments have to go to them which, I presume, is why the council said there was nothing they could do when you asked for a payment plan. As for taking it back from the bailiffs, I'm not sure on that I'm afraid.

 

I think the council can close accounts down up to 8 weeks in advance (this will be why they can't just work out how much you owe now). If you're moving in October give them a ring/write in mid-August and they can close the account down and issue you with a closing amount. You'll only have to pay the balance for the period you were liable at that address, so don't worry about having to pay the whole year because you won't have to.

 

If, after the account is closed, it turns out you have overpaid then you can have that refunded or transferred to your new account. If you still owe money then it will stay owing on that account, it won't affect your new account at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the council tax became due in april i was just about to start a new job (may 5th).

I didnt get my first pay until end of may (because im paid monthly). Then my company put me on emergency tax br1 (even though i filled in p46).

 

Then in june i had a letter from council saying that if i dont pay what i owe for current year they will take action by the way of liabiltiy. I rang the council and explained everything to the lady.

She said i had lost the right to installments and i have to wait until i have a liability order from the courts before they would be able to help me.

 

Then at beginning of june i sent off my p45 to my company.

At the end of june they had still emergency taxed me despite me sending in paperwork.

Then in july i recieved paperwork for liability order with some court costs added.

It was just over a week when i rang the council and they said it had gone to bailiffs and they would be contacting me and to wait for letter.

This came about a week later.

This is when i rang the council.

 

The first guy i spoke to was rude, he said it was basically my own fault (which yes it is, but there are ways of telling people). He said that its in hands of bailiffs and i have to deal with them.

 

So i rang bristow and suitor bailiffs. The lady on the phone went through some questions, do i have car? can i pay the full amount? etc.

Then she asked if i want a payment plan.

I explained that i was on a low income and have rent to pay and she said i have to pay £268 month!

I nearly fell on the floor!!

She wouldnt listen so i rang back the council.

 

The next council guy i spoke to was a bit better than the first and said he understood, but he couldnt do anything and i must pay what the bailiffs asked for.

 

So i rang off and rang them back yet again!

This time i spoke to a different guy, he still was adement that there was nothing that could be done.

I started begging and he went and got a supervisor.

She came on the phone and asked what my earning was, employer details, paye number etc.

She said she would talk to the bailiffs and try and get me a lower payment of £127 month, but they could not take it back as they do not do that anymore!

I explained that i would not be staying in this house very long as lease expires oct and i would be moving nearer work, school etc. I also explained that i am currently living with someone whom i dont want to be living with and that he dont work (hes on the council tax jointly) and that i will be leaving him when i move house.

 

So she went and rang me back 5 mins later. She said she had spoke to bailiffs and lowest payments i could have was £127 first month, £126 thereafter.

I was told i had to pay first install by 1st aug (4 days notice) and if i miss a payment the bailiffs would attend. She said they also have my work details and they will do an attachemnt of earnings is necessary.

She also told me that its an offence not to pay council tax and that i could be put in prison.

 

Thats when i mentioned that i know someone who was in similar postition, fell behind with council tax (exactly same months i owe), only difference was that she was living in a higher tax band than me. I explained that she also earns more than me and is due to move house in aug this year and that the same council took hers back from the bailiffs and made arrangement for her to pay £70 first month and £120 thereafter!

 

The lady from council said, she dont know what happened and it should never have been taken back, as they dont do that anymore. She told me it would be looked into and whoever authorised it, would be addressed!

 

That was it!

They are very very unhelpful. I was just worried in case i had to pay all of this council tax at £126 a month right to april next year and then when i moved also pay whatever council tax i have for the new house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't they have 40 days from the date of receipt of the SAR to get all their records out to the person requesting them?

 

Yup, it's 40 days.

 

Yes 40 in total, but if they want things to remain as they are then they have 12 days or everything has to be put on hold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right gotcha. Wouldn't it be advisable to mention the status of things when sending the SAR as it's unlikely that their Data Protection Controller will be aware of the background behind the request?

 

Or would it be advisible to request that action be suspended while further legal advice was being sought?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes 40 in total, but if they want things to remain as they are then they have 12 days or everything has to be put on hold.

 

I'm a little confused, please excuse me. Where does the 12 days come from within the Data Protection Act?

 

:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is 12 + 30. If after 12 days you haven't received it, whatever you are enquiring about is put into dispute and if still not received after a further 30 days they commit an offence

 

This isn't an equiry under DPA, this is a Subject Access Request for which they can only charge a maximum of £10. A DPA request can cost a lot more depending on the amount of work they have to do to collect the data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pammij - you definitely don't have to pay the balance for this account for the whole year, you will just pay for the period you were liable (Apr to start of Oct) which I estimated to be approx £425. Contact them as soon as you can to get that account closed down and your new one set up, then you will have the exact amount to pay.

 

It does seem to have been referred to the bailiffs pretty quickly. Bailiffs are used if there is no response to a liability order, but there doesn't seem to be much time inbetween them issuing the liability order and referring it to the bailiffs so perhaps query that if you write in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is 12 + 30. If after 12 days you haven't received it, whatever you are enquiring about is put into dispute and if still not received after a further 30 days they commit an offence

 

This isn't an equiry under DPA, this is a Subject Access Request for which they can only charge a maximum of £10. A DPA request can cost a lot more depending on the amount of work they have to do to collect the data.

 

I've got it now.

 

The whole 12 days + 30 days thing is to do with those who wish to make a request for information under Sections 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. For the record, the 30 days criminal offence issue no longer exists.

 

A Subject Access Request IS a request under the Data Protection Act (Section 7 in fact) and most certainly is 40 days.

 

More info here:

 

Data Protection Act 1998 (c. 29) - Statute Law Database

 

and here:

 

Personal Information - Privacy Rights and Personal Rights - ICO

 

Hope this makes sense!

 

Best wishes,

 

Seq.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that a SAR was a request for all data held by an organisation on a data subject.

 

If my understanding is correct I don't see the difference between this and a DPA request. Could you explain this further? Thanks

 

The difference is that under DPA, you ask for a particular thing and that is what you get. Under SAR, you are asking for the data on a subject ie person and they have to send you 'all' they have on that subject.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That was it!

They are very very unhelpful. I was just worried in case i had to pay all of this council tax at £126 a month right to april next year and then when i moved also pay whatever council tax i have for the new house.

 

 

Technically yes you do as the Council have a Liability Order that covers the period to March 31 2011. You must as soon as you have the details of your move notify them ASAP of the change in your circumstances. Seeing as the Council are dragging their heels now it will pay to get your local Councillor involved so you have some help. Do everything in writing and send it by email and hard copy - if you can deliver by hand.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference is that under DPA, you ask for a particular thing and that is what you get. Under SAR, you are asking for the data on a subject ie person and they have to send you 'all' they have on that subject.

 

Did you not read what I posted squire?

 

A Subject Access Request *IS* the same thing as a request under the Data Protection Act!

 

£10 + 40 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference is that under DPA, you ask for a particular thing and that is what you get. Under SAR, you are asking for the data on a subject ie person and they have to send you 'all' they have on that subject.

 

Cheers. So as I understand it asking for a particular piece may result in additional admin charges due to the potential extra time it may take to locate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. So as I understand it asking for a particular piece may result in additional admin charges due to the potential extra time it may take to locate it.

 

You should challenge that sort of thing:

 

A Subject Access Request entitles you to all the data they hold and costs £10.

 

Have a look:

 

How to access information - Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...