Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A1 Approved Warranty - Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Earlier this month I bought a used car - the dealer gave me 3 months warranty through A1 Approved.

 

A few days ago the gearbox went completely so I booked it into a garage and rang the company up - they asked the garage to have a look but don't begin repair work until they've approved it.

 

Anyway they've now got back to me and said it's fair wear and tear - rubbish as it's been running fine before the day it happened. I've tried taking it up with the dealer - they're not interested and the warranty isn't worth the paper it's printed on so is there any way I can still get the money from them - really don't want to be £250 out of pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Unless it's a broken spark plug, everything is wear and tear with these rip-off warranty companies. Just be glad you didn't pay for it as you very rarely get anywhere with them.

 

Your redress is with with the selling dealer under the sale of goods act, the warranty is meaningless and the sellers hope that you know sod all and when the 'wear and tear' is invoked, you won't know your rights and then you pay for it.

 

What is wrong with the gear box?

Did an engineer from the insurance company pay a visit to examin it?

 

You must go back to the dealer who is responsible for the repairs at his cost. Don't let him fob you off with crap about the warranty, it is his sole responsibility.

 

Give him a ring tomorrow and say, 'I have taken advice (no need to say who from) and that you are responsible under the sale of good act'. Then come back and tell us what he says and then we can go from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any progress with this invmatt??

 

Hi sorry for the late reply.

 

I've had to pay for the repair myself as I needed the car back however I contacted the warranty company again and had a right go, the "manager" of the claims department said he would call the garage again and see about getting it sorted.

 

I've been in touch with the garage and they've had no contact so I'll be back on the phone to them again today.

 

In terms of the gearbox it had blown (can't remember exactly what he said but something had gone through the casing)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Dear invmatt

 

Sorry to learn of your problems with your claim. I am the Claims Director at A1 Approved and we take all customer concerns very seriously indeed. I would invite you to call me direct on 0800 9706860 to personally discuss this matter.

 

Kind Regards

 

Stuart Haskell

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear invmatt

 

I still encourage you to contact me personally because if we have made the wrong decision on your claim then we need to redress the situation.

 

I am away on holiday as of tomorrow evening for one week only, however if you can find the time to contact me before 5.00pm Friday 20 August then I will give your claim my immediate attention. Otherwise please contact me anytime from Tuesday 31st August onwards.

 

Kind Regards

 

 

Stuart Haskell

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dear invmatt

 

Just a quick note to let you know that I am back in the office now so if you wish to talk to me personally then please feel free to do so.

 

Kind Regards

 

 

Stuart Haskell

0800 9706860

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Bought a Ford Focus and got 12months Gold Warranty with Alapproved.

 

After a week, the handbrake failed and the right back calliper had failed and needs to be replaced. A1 tell me that its "wear and tear".

 

I was given what is covered when I paid for the warranty and Brake Callipers are covered!!

 

I will be taking advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warranty is not required and you have been ripped off. If that is the same time as you bought the car, go back to the dealer and tell him you want the premium refunded as it was missold and that under the sale of goods act he is to repair the fault.

 

As Stuart Haskell the claims manager has contributed to this thread, he will get an email with you post. So Stuart Haskell, another dis-satisified customer, what are you going to do about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I got a Vauxhall Frontera DTi 4 x 4 from 2nd dealer he gave a Gold cover A1 Approved Warranty the speedo keeps stopping restarts when it feels like it giving false millage readings & the rear window wiper has problems. My newphew got in touch with A1 they told him the 2nd car dealer had misold it & we had been sent out a letter saying the cover had been dropped to silver. Has any of you out there received a letter before it broke down? We never the dealer agreeded to send a chq for £100 he said it was a legal requirement for the speedo, but refused to pay anything for the rear wiper its not a legal requirement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We never the dealer agreeded to send a chq for £100 he said it was a legal requirement for the speedo, but refused to pay anything for the rear wiper its not a legal requirement. [/font]

 

What the hell has "legal requirement" or not got to do with him choosing which bits he fixes or not? If the car you bought was fitted with a rear wiper then you have a reasonable expectation that this wiper works correctly for an acceptable length of time. SOGA reckons this length of time should be around 6 months at least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the Dealer that sold me it was a legal requirement is the checks that they do on an MoT, according to him it is not. Why I can't understand, but if that is the Law then why do the car companys put them on cars?? How do we find out if this 2nd dealer has ever been taken to court before/ The problem has not ended the Speedo still is not working properly-hence the correct millage is not being recorded, its cost me hundreds so far & now I need the cluster Instrument panel to be sent off. I'm paying at the moment, but I will see the Dealer/A1 Approved in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A1 Approved problems seem to be popping up a lot on these forums. Doubt if Mr Haskell is going to get involved in this - his silence is deafening. If/when you issue court proceedings make sure you issue them against both the dealer and A1 Approved. That way they can sort it out hopefully between themselves before getting to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Dear Jagster1966

Sorry to learn of your dissatisfaction with your claim. If you are who I think you are then it is fair to point out that the starter motor failure has been authorised in full, and we have merely pointed out that if the ring gear is worn on your car then this will not be covered. But no decision has been made on your claim as the vehicle has not been stripped yet.

If you wish to discuss this matter further then please do not hesitate to contact me on our free-phone number.

Kind Regards

Stuart Haskell

Link to post
Share on other sites

No in all fairness you have paid out on the starter and iam not complaining about that,but if the starter hadnt of gone and this dual mass flywheel had carried on disintergrating an not been noticed by the mechanic what has in my opinion stopped a possible major mechanical failure and also i had 2 replace all brake discs at my own cost as i never recieved any information as to who the warranty company was untill 27/03/12 that was just a week or two before it run out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol funny isnt it guess who my warranty is with and guess what they said when my car failed you got it wear and tear what a joke

 

It's not funny to hear about that old wear and tear get out. You can always appeal to the Insurance Ombudsman who will likely agree to your claim. As Mr Haskell is back may be he would like to say who the insurance company is that backs A1 Approved Warranty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doulbt that would happen but lets give the man a chance

 

Agreed, but not very good when you are caused unnecessary inconvenience. I had a similar wear and tear problem last year and they (not A1) were told to pay the claim by the Ombudsman. Just leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. Let us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...