Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax being awkward with me after a complaint I made


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4913 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My local council tax office sent a breakdown of council tax benefit awarded to me for a 4 month period to someone else and I received someone elses breakdown instead. I complained but the woman whose information I received didn't. Whoever recieved my information never sent it to me or returned it to the council and also didn't complain.

 

I went to the Independent Complaints Ombudsman because of their breach regarding data protection and the fact that they kept changing their excuses as to what happened. Whilst they couldn't deny they had sent me someone elses details they wouldn't accept they had sent mine elsewhere. To cut a long story short while the ICO were taking this case on board I received my council tax bill for this year 2010-2011 and it was a nil balance.

 

Last year I claimed council tax benefit for 4 months, I wrote to them to let them know when I was back at work and they sent me a new bill for the rest of the year owing minus tax benefit and I paid it in full. I heard nothing else from them until my new bill came this year to find it was a nil balance.

 

I rang them to ask why it was a nil balance when I was not entitled to council tax benefit having returned to work and earned too much monthly to claim it. The guy I spoke to said 'you didn't tell us you wanted to stop your benefit from last year so it's been carried on hence the nil balance'.

 

I explained that I had stopped it and had paid the rest of the year via the bill they sent me after my council tax benefit stopped. Basically, they'd made another mistake. He told me to send in my wages to see if I was still entitled to claim as it could be that I was still eligible. I asked him which part of what I'd explained to him did he not understand but he would not stop talking general rubbish. He was then attempting to tell me that I had been claiming the benefit when I was not entitled to it and knew I was doing it.

 

All I needed was a new bill for the year telling me the correct amount I should be paying without council tax benefit. It's that simple, or so you'd think. No, instead he sent me a form telling me to send in my wage slips, bank statements etc and I ignored it. That was in March.

 

I passed all this information on to the ICO who told me to stop communicating with them completely and they would deal with it. I've now received an email from them telling me they can write to the council regarding me receiving information that was someone elses but as the council deny they sent my details elsewhere they can't do anything with that. No mention of the council being awkward with me regarding my new bill even though they'd told me to stop communicating with them as it was all part and parcel to the case :-?

 

I've only now just received my new bill for this year with the correct amount to pay although I now have only 6 months to pay instead of 10. They've also sent me a bill they want right now for £350 they claim I am owing from last year. This is because this guy I spoke to cancelled my whole awarded claim for the council tax benefit for the 4 months that I was entitled to it.

 

I went to the CAB today and they spoke to the council on my behalf regarding this £350 and their reluctance to accept that I wrote in to stop the benefit and let them know when I was back at work and even to acknowledge that I'd paid the bill they sent me. I definitley don't owe them anything from last year. Unbelievably the CAB made it worse, they let the council tell them that I needed to send in my P60 for the year last year and my bank statements so they can look again at my benefit claim for the 4 months last year. They had all the info they needed and asked for at the time and I have receipts for everything I took in to them. I'm not sending anything back in when it's their error and inconveniencing myself because of them anymore.

 

All they had to do was send me an ammended bill for this year and say sorry we made a mistake. They're now trying to make out I was purposefully claiming benefit when I actually wasn't claiming anything.

 

I'm tempted to let them take me to court because I have all my paperwork and proof of everything but the CAB kept saying don't let it get to court :-?

 

What would you do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you know they sent your details to someone else?

 

Why not send them a 'Subject Access Request' (£10) and get back everything they have on file about you.

 

I was wondering that also Conniff. Is it just an assumption OhReally that the person whose details you received must, in return, have received yours??

 

Our Council are a real pain in the neck but they always use window envelopes so that the address on the correspondence is also the delivery address.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it is an assumption. The letter shown through the envelope was mine. This letter stated that it enclosed a breakdown of benefit awarded for me. That breakdown included was not mine and was addressed to someone else. I hand delivered it to her whilst the council tried to persuade me to give it back to them. I don't know if the breakdown I should have received went to her, I only know that they had a breakdown there to post for me and it wasn't there so it's not a giant leap to believe they sent it elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, when the CAB were fobbed off by the council in which they told me I had to send my P60 and bank statements from last year I've now received the documentation supposedly requesting this and guess what it is?

 

It's a form to be filled in if I want to claim housing/council tax benefit. That's it, that's all that's in the envelope and no mention of any phone call or cover letter. The form is dated from the 15th July 2010. I don't want to claim housing or council tax benefit, I'm not entitled to it, is it just me being unreasonable and thick here or are these people deliberately trying to be obtuse.

 

How am I supposed to get anywhere with this, I'm more than happy to pay this years bill and show them their error regarding last years 4 month council tax benefit that I was entitled to and given, until I rang to query my nil balance bill for this year.

 

Anyone got any suggestions on how I'm supposed to get this sorted, the CAB are clearly not able to and no matter who seems to deal with it at the council they still keep getting it wrong? The complaints procedure for this council is an online web page form and it's not adressed to anybody. It even asks if you want a reply! Who do I write to that's not going to pass it to the very dept that can't get it right?

Edited by ohreally
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an assumption. Officer could have printed off a breakdown for the lady, then was about to get your account up when they were interrupted by a phone call, etc, they then go back print off the breakdown forgetting that they haven't brought up the correct screen. Or they could have had the lady's screen up as they had still to do something on her account and your screen up and printed off the wrong one. Stupid mistake to make but just because you got the wrong info it does not follow that the other person got your info.

 

You could go to your MP or local Councillor but complaints/enquiries usually will be allocated to someone in the department the complaint is about first of all. You could also go back to the Ombudsman and ask them what they have found out about the problem reminding them they told you that they would handle it.

 

When a case goes to Court it is a liability hearing. All the Judge will do is agree whether or not you are liable for the Council Tax for the property in question not whether you can pay, or whether the bill is correct, etc. So if it goes to Court and the Judge asks do you live there, etc and you say yes, they will find you liable to pay the Council Tax and you will get Court charges added to your account.

 

Although Council Tax and Council Tax Benefits ususally come under the same Council department they will be different teams. If I were you I would contact the Benefits Team to find out what on earth is going on with your CTB and then take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just thought I'd update. I managed to get the council tax benefits manager to hold back the summons for the £350 until he'd looked into it and the up shot is, he believes I do owe the money and they made a mistake.

 

They gave me a bill from the period I went back to work covering Oct 09 to Mar 10 telling me I owed them £165 and I had no reason to believe that bill was wrong. I had no idea how they calculate their breakdowns for council tax benefit and this bill had a breakdown of what they'd awarded me. The bill itself wasn't added up wrong. I paid this bill. The manager tells me the £350 should have been included in this bill but how am I supposed to tell when their bills are wrong? Like anyone else, I have to trust, hope and rely on them to make sure the bills sent to me are correct. He admits it's their error and told me I can appeal.

 

He asked me if it didn't occurr to me that this amount was a bit low and I told him I had no bloody idea what council tax benefit they'd awarded me after a 100 pages worth of breakdowns and they clearly had no idea themselves otherwise they wouldn't have awarded me more benefit than I may have been entitled to and sent a bill out that was incorrect. I also told him it was outstanding work from his team coming to me 6 months later to ask for it outrightly. They'll try and make it your fault no matter what, the dam cheek of it.

 

Do you think I'll have to pay it? They've put me in a right mess financially having to pay this years bill in a 6 month period as it is, I don't have the money to pay £350 up front and he told me the only thing they could do would be to extend the 6 months to 8 months but they'd have to include the £350 on top of what I have left of this years bill.

 

I can't even begin to tell you how angry I am. All this because they made mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if there is a legal obligation to do so, but if they made a mistake concerning the amount you owe then it would be a gesture of good faith to remove the summons. Whether they would actually do that is a totally different matter!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got to be honest and say that I know where you're coming from with this Ohreally.

 

I receive CTB also and have had similar 20/30 page breakdowns that I can't make head nor tail of. On the basis that the written information I've supplied to my Council is correct, then I can only presume that their calculations are similarly so.

 

Although it's their mistake, I think that you're probably going to have to pay whatever it is that they say you owe them. All you can do is to negotiate a repayment period which is affordable for you. If the 8 months is unaffordable to you then write back and tell them that you want longer.

 

You can escalate this as a formal corporate complaint to the Chief Executive to see if they are any more sympathetic and equally as disgusted by the incompetence in their benefits office.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax bills? Easy. Here is how they work it out as far as I can see:

 

Take the tax band of your property. This is the council tax you should pay if working etc. Next divide it by the number of council employees who smoke, take away the number of letters received by Take-That official fan club from under 10s, add to this the number of Subway sandwich shops in London. Now, the easy bit. If you own a Vauxhall Omega then multiply this figure by the number of cylinders on your neighbours car (Neighbour to your left). With me so far?

 

Next add up the number of days in the year. It must never be equal to 365 or 366! Then take away the number of Tescos express shops in Manchester. Now count the number of bank statements the client sent in and double that. This is the number of pages you must send them with the breakdown.

 

Finally use the equatiion systematic quantizing erational multiplication directive and effecitively make it so that no normal human would ever understand it. Here is an example of that equation:

 

A man has two cats. How many cats does he have? Not 3. Why? Because it if you say he has 2 cats that makes our job look silly easy. So, we must justify this whole phoney baloney department by making up utter nonsense. So, the calculation would be like this:

 

Number of cats: Less than 15

Number of applicants: Not 4

Calculation = number of legs times number of heads divided by 5 (less amutee adjustment) plus a notional adjustment for the first 3 legs x number of bank statement pages, less day of week time car park spaces left.

 

Answer is not 3.

 

I hope this makes it all clearer for you. It really is easy when you get the hang of it.

 

NURSE...... I need my medicine!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly what happened to us with the Malvern/Worcester council tax offices. You try to be honest and upfront and do the rigyt thing and they screw it up and then suddenly youa re at fault. I have sicne learnt not to communicate with them by phone by ratehr by recorded mail and even that they lost. Won in the end though as they made an "official" mistake by the regulation states that they need to write it off. If you did it all correct and can prove it and they made the mistake then you are NOT liable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dragons Dennis that was class :madgrin: loved it!

 

I've just received a letter from the council benefit team manager and he says 'I apologise for the delay in ending your council tax benefit which led to the overpayment that was created. It has been decided that the overpayment is recoverable as you would have known that you were being overpaid'

 

I wrote to the them telling them when it should stop and they sent me a bill for the rest of the year owing and I paid it. I didn't hear another peep until this years bill came at a nil balance. Then I rang them to tell them it was wrong. How would I have known that I was being overpaid? I sat and had a meeting with this manager who was absolutely not thick by any means so I have to assume that by writing that he's not unwilling to be ridiculed about the fact that this is a rather low standard of management skills.

 

I should also send my appeal to him and he'll pass it on to where it should go.....I don't think so :jaw:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took my appeal in by hand to the council offices this morning and asked them for a receipt. The look I got was priceless and the woman who dealt with me immediately emmanated an air of unhelpfulness and misery. I asked for the address of the appeals service since it was meant to be an independent service.

 

She rang upstairs, they use a few different ones so they couldn't tell me which one it would be. I know I shouldn't but I lost my temper. I asked for her to give me them all then but no she suddenly didn't know any of them and neither did anyone else. There was suddenly no one available to come down from upstairs and speak to me.

 

How are they going to pass my appeal on if they claim not to know the address or which one they use? What's the big secret?

 

I got her to write on the receipt that she wouldn't give me the address and took the name of the person she rang upstairs for advice. She wasn't very happy and made out like I'd leaned over the counter and strangled her.

 

They really are a bunch of utter d*ckheads. I can only imagine how much money Trafford Council are raking in that they may not be entitled to. Mine was a straightforward cased and they couldn't get it right. I don't think any of them have any idea what they're doing.

 

How do I go about getting the address they're supposedly sending my appeal to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must have a local newspaper you can pass this on to, if not try the Sun or Star.

 

Ask for an appointment with the boss of finance, if that will be in a year or two, then write to him, mark it 'Personal' and hand deliver it as you did this one.

 

Nice job your insistance and making them uncomfortable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put all your concerns/problems/complaints in writing - address it to the Chief Executive of the Council and mark both letter and envelope "Formal Complaint", failure for them to then investigate properly then gives you an avenue to the LGO and will go on the Council's record.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had the final notice - cancellation of instalments threatening the summons if I don't pay in full this morning. They really are complete imbeciles. When it's gone to independent appeal are they allowed to still send those out?

 

I'm doing the formal complaint to the Chief Exec as we speak, thanks for that info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be careful. Waiting for a decision on Benefits or for CT Benefit alone is not sufficient reason to withold payment. You are still supposed to pay in the interim and any credit you may build up is either refundable (on request) or knocked off what you still may owe. Liability for CT is only a Yes or No answer, there is no middle ground.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The previous post is correct in that Council Tax Liability takes no consideration of benefit appeals.

 

The council can legally proceed with action against you - council tax takes council tax benefit in to account only as it would any other payments due from yourself, it gets no special treatment.

 

Saying this though, in my dept we do often hold action on the request of our appeals section but only of its apparent its going to make a big difference in the amount outstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...