Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
    • The United Autoworkers Union took a risk in a Republican - and often anti-union - part of the US.View the full article
    • good spot...though i'm unsure, but it does seem like it can't be related to this latest issue as the OP mentions she knew nothing about the  order. dx  
    • wasn't that for the CCJ for the mental capacity with the leaseholder?   SO would be different to this.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax problem- partner not on voters role


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5056 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest marky313

hi there,

 

i am self employed and have done really bad over the last two years. apparently i would have been elegible for not paying council tax or certainly severely reduced. i never claimed as i was hoping my business would pick up but unfortunately things have only got worse. now i want to try and claim the CT benefit but i have a little problem.

 

my partner has been living with me for the last two years but has never been registered on the voters roll. i want to claim the benefit but even though we were eligible for CT benefit, i am worried if i now put her on the voters roll they will try and claim back council tax . she is already part of my claim for working tax credit and family tax credit as we have had two kids together within a short space of time. she has lived in this country for about 6 years but is originally from poland.

 

what i want to know what is the best way to get this benefit without getting into trouble. as iv said i should have been getting this benefit a few years ago but i never dreamed that things would get as hard as they are now. i paying my creditors £1 a month due to my poor financial situation and have spoken to cccs about 3 months ago so it wont be hard to prove how poor i am. some people have advised me to say she has just come back from poland but i am worried about saying this in case of any furhter implications. she was last on a voters role just over two years ago so how do i explain the gap without getting into trouble or more debt.

 

appreciate any help on this matter as they have now obtained court order to chase me.

 

thx in advance,

 

marky313

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest marky313

Hi Aviva,

 

i have lived at my current address for 10 years and always claimed single persons allowance. This was until two years ago when my partner got pregnant and moved in. shortly after we had twins born 14 weeks early just after id setup my own business and had a nightmare. one son died and the other had a lengthy stay in hospital. then had a logistical nightmare trying to sort out all child and family related benefits- even had to prove my other son had died to the benefite office- very sensitive!! all this time i never changed the council tax roll as it was the least of my worries-i am still fending off phone calls and letters re my debt while struggling to live day-to-day. even before my partner moved in i was eligible for CT reduction due to low income but as i said i never got round to changing it due to fear of more reprisals against me ( inland revenue want about £2000 grand working tax back due to confusion over working tax forms- but thats another story!!).

 

in summary i have paid them far more than i should have been, based on my income, but now i am in severe debt problems and have no choice but to try and address the problem. i would like to tell the council the exact truth but i feel that they will not be refunding the extra CT i paid but rather pursuing me for the extra 25%. my biggest fault was not telling them strightaway but ill freely admit i was a mess for a long time afterwards and only in the last 4 months, have i been able to think more clearly and try and get on top of my problems. not trying to defraud anyone just want whats fair as in the best way possible.

 

thx again, mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest marky313

TO CLARIFY...

 

not sure it was clear in the previous msg but i was genuinely the only person living here the whole time until my pregnant partner moved in.

 

cheers, mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is for the last 2 years while your partner has been living with you did you claim and receive the 25% single person discount? It seems from your comment that the Council may pursue you for the extra 25% that yes you did. This will be seen as fraud if they find out.

 

If you make an application for CT benefit now this may trigger an investigation into how long your partner has been at the property by the Council Tax dept. They would want to know when she moved in and where she lived before and will require proof. I know that when Councils investigate benefit fraud they can look into bank accounts, etc. I don't know whether Council Tax have the same powers to investigate fraudulent discount claims but it wouldn't surprise me if they did.

 

The rules for getting CT benefit or Housing Benefit backdated are very strict on the amount of time you have to make the application, the length of time that it can be backdated for and the reason for not applying. Applications that state that the person did not know they could claim or chose to see how things went financially are usually turned down.

 

Mostly it will depend on how well the Council depts work together. If the Council Tax and Benefits teams work well together and share info then it is likely there will be questions asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that when Councils investigate benefit fraud they can look into bank accounts, etc. I don't know whether Council Tax have the same powers to investigate fraudulent discount claims but it wouldn't surprise me if they did.

We dont have the facilities in the same way that benefit fraud sections do to check details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...