Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

unknown trade counter CCJ - now Marstons HCEO


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5062 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

im writing this post on behalf of a friend whos having balliff letters sent to him over a trade account he had back in 2006.

 

he's just had contact from marstons baliffs saying they will be visiting him to enforce a ccj gained in september 2007 through northampton bulk processing, which is the first he had heard of it.

 

i have told him to request a cca and the company have replied with a account application form which is obviously unenforceable but how do we proceed with with getting the judgement set aside.

 

he has gone to the local county court and got a n244 form but is this the one he needs to fill out as £70 is a lot to waste on the wrong form.

 

do we need to mention the fact on this that the agreement he has is unenforceable or do we just do it on the basis that no summons or judgement has ever been received.

thanks in advance for any replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is the N244 you need to fill in parts A B C and statement of truth , you have to state reasons why you want it set aside, and you can briefly outline your defence I believe.

You will no doubt get help from the experts later

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved here.

 

Whether the agreement was enforceable or not-is not the main issue.

Courts have become alarmed at the number of apps to have judgements set aside on the basis that theres no agreement been supplied.

Better to seek the set aside using the arguement that he had no knowledge of this and so no possibility to defend.

 

Have Marstons given any instructions ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go along with this as the main object is the no knowledge scenario.

 

If things open up at the hearing then you may be asked for further information.

 

If you are on inc support/jsa/ working tax you can apply for a fee exemption.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the letters from the Bailiffs posted as in have a stamp on them or just shoved thro' the door. The reason for asking is that as an old trade account the debt may be for more than £6oo and Marstons are attending as High Court Enforcement Officers rather than Bailiffs.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Marstons given any instructions ?

 

no they have just said they are coming on wednesday.

 

Are the letters from the Bailiffs posted as in have a stamp on them or just shoved thro' the door. The reason for asking is that as an old trade account the debt may be for more than £6oo and Marstons are attending as High Court Enforcement Officers rather than Bailiffs.

 

PT

 

The amount borrowed was about £3500 the amount repayed was £3700 but the amount that they were demanding on top was £4000 but for some reason has gone down to about £3000.

The letter head says high court enforcement officers so i assume thats what they are.

Thanks again for your replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just re-read your original post and have noticed that the CCJ was from 2007.

 

You should contact the court to confirm that the Warrant of Execution was renewed as it is only valid for one year.

 

It can be renewed, but unless this is done it cannot be enforced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

im writing this post on behalf of a friend whos having balliff letters sent to him over a trade account he had back in 2006.

he's just had contact from marstons baliffs saying they will be visiting him to enforce a ccj gained in september 2007 through northampton bulk processing, which is the first he had heard of it.

i have told him to request a cca and the company have replied with a account application form which is obviously unenforcable but how do we proceed with with getting the judgement set aside.

he has gone to the local county court and got a n244 form but is this the one he needs to fill out as £70 is a lot to waste on the wrong form.

plus do we need to mention the fact on this that the agreement he has is unenforcable or do we just do it on the basis that no summons or judgement has ever been received.

thanks in advance for any replies

 

Doubt whether a N244 will be of any benefit to claim for unenforceability as you will need better grounds than this. Have a read of this and see if you can satisfy any of these requirements:

 

Debt Factsheets - How to set aside a Judgment in the County Court

 

If they are coming on Wednesday then time is of the essence. Have you paid anything at all towards the debt? Have you a payment plan in operation? As asked earlier did you defend this?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I put in the n244 form on the grounds that my friend never received the court papers and was unaware that any proceedings had been started so he never had a chance to file a defence.

 

He was getting letters from trade pro demanding payment but it wasnt until he started getting letters from marstons high court enforcement officers that he asked for my help and we realised that they had gained a ccj in his absence

 

As i stated earlier i think he used around £3500 and repaid just a little bit more around £3700 but they were demanding over £4000 at first but that has now gone down to around £3000.

 

There are a few irregularities in his statements as he made a payment of over £400 that was credited one month but then taken off again about two months

 

i need to find out the reason for that but they havent responded to tha sar request yet.

 

Thanks for the advice about the warrant of execution i will be checking that out later on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now we've got some meat on the bones, I imagined this to the scenario but didn't want to prompt. It appears that for whatever reason he has never received any of the original documents.

 

Do you know when the CCJ was awarded and for how much? Were they adjudged "guilty" by being awarded judgment in Default against them?

 

Apart from applying for set aside on the basis of not having had the original docs and therefore being unable to mount a defence/counterclaim/make offer of payment - you also need to come up with a solution to be able to pay either in whole or by instalments. To show good faith sometimes the Court may ask for monies to be deposited into Court. You may also have another problem dependent on the age of the CCJ which is why I asked when it was awarded etc.

 

Now that you have the HCEO from Marstons involved this is now the most important matter to deal with. When submitting the set aside application you should also ask for a Stay of Execution pending detremination of your set aside application. The Stay halts all further enforcement action and charges until the set aside is decided. If set aside is granted all fees made by the HCEO must be refunded/scrapped. Please note applying for set aside alone does NOT prevent attendance by the HCEO.

 

You make reference to a SAR - who have you asked this from and how long ago did you ask?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judgement went through norhampton bulk so it was just rubber stamped and i think it was awarded in 2007.

 

The sar request went off last week to trade pro after they sent him a copy of his account application form which while it had the interest rate, signature and amount of credit on the same sheet nowhere did it state when and at what frequency he was expected to pay it back.

 

I really dont think they have an enforceable agreement plus no default notice has ever been received

 

im really interested in whats going to turn up under the sar request, as for repaying it im hoping we can get it written off before it gets back to court .

Thanks again for your replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well today was a waste of time

my mate waited in all day and nobody turned up.

 

He phoned northampton county court to find out if the warrant had been renewed only to be told it wasn't dealt with there but it was dealt with in milton keynes,

 

he phoned milton keynes and they said that it hadnt but as marstons are sheriffs that they don't have to as they can make their own is this true?

 

Thanks in advance for any replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...