Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rocket Marketing (Buying the Brickie off tv)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

 

Im posting this question for my parents as i think they have been thoroughly ripped off!

 

My parents were sat watching tv when this advert came on for this Brickie thing that Tommy Walsh advertises and for some reason my parents decide to phone the number and buy one of these things....they are 75 and highly unlikely to be building any walls!

 

The thing was 39 quid, so he's on the phone and orders it, he is abit hard of hearing so he prob couldn't hear what they were saying.

 

Anyway this crappy thing shows up, then they get a ticket delivered to say there is a letter to collect from the post office.

 

As they weren't well they didn't collect it for a few days and when they did it was a 'Savings Pack' from Rocket marketing which i pressume the company that sold the brickie or same company had used my parents details and Card details to open up this savings account for all the special savings they could make.

 

In the letter it said you have 30 days to say if you do not want this savings offer or we will charge you 99 quid!

 

My dad doesnt read to well and my mum didn't bother to read it properly as she hadn't agreed to anything or thought she had signed up to anything so ignored it until the bank statement came through.

 

They had taken 99 quid from there account plus 1.99 for postage for a letter they did not request.

 

They rang them up complaining and basically got fobbed off saying you agreed and set up a pass word which was my dads date of birth.

 

After reading the small print it said you have 61 days to decline and you will be charged 5 quid admin but get back 94 quid they have taken.

 

So we rang them and it was 61 days from the date of the letter not when they recieved it and as they didn't pick it up from post office straight away and they have missed this 61 day thing as they have only recieved the bank statement and realised the money had been taken.

 

They said they will listen to there recorded phone calls and they said it appears to have been a hickup during that phone call and said they will investigate.....they will be intouch...prob sometime never i bet.

 

So can they legally just send you something and then say you now have this and we will take x money if you don't get intouch then take the money off someones swith card?

 

They didn't sign up to anything and only thought they ordered this rubbish item.

 

Is there anyone with advice on how to proceed on this or a letter we can send for robbing pensioners?

 

In the mean time i've told them to stay off phones purchasing things off the tv!

 

Cheers Olliepup.

Edited by olliepup
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh i feel a complaint coming on:

 

Tommy Walsh - Official TV Agent - Arlington Enterprises

 

how about watchdog too!

 

oh and get that switch card cancelled!

 

i would also whilst on the phone to them initiate a chargeback on the card

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds to me very much like unfair trading. I suggest that you make a complaint to the OFT under CPUT and also inform your Trading Standards office immediately.

 

I expect that 100s of other people have been targetted in this way as well.

 

I wonder whether Tommy Walsh knows about this tactic or whether they are simply taking advantage of his good name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent the link to this thread to a contact at the BBC.

 

We'll see.

 

However, make all the complaints which have been suggested

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the feed back!

 

Is it worth writing to them to inform them of what i intend to do?

 

Robbing OAP's is not good, i'll contact my local Trading Standards Monday.

 

Hopefully get the money back for my parents.

 

Thanks for sending the link, more people that know the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i think this will be big news

deserve all they get

if you tip them off

if they plant an insider etc it will blow it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive sent an email for starters to Tommys people through your link explaining the situation and thought it was very underhand and fraudulent to take money by deception and the company that did so associates itself with Tommy and his product endorsment.

 

All we want is our money back, but i'll still go ahead and inform all parties ie OFT and TS which i also mentioned in my email.

 

See if i get a reply.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...
Guest MikeW001

FYI

Rocket Marketing are still doing exactly the same shady practices eight years later.

My father has just fallen victim and his bank is not being particularly helpful,

regarding the charge back.

Has anyone else found a purchase remiting £90 odd to Rocket Marketing on their card or bank statement, for a useless catalogue of unwanted and unasked for discounts.

If so, I would love to hear if you were able to secure a refund and how.

Cheers

Mike :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bank must do a chargeback.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...