Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arden Credit Management chasing lomard loan debt paid through DMP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wonder if anyone can help?

 

I've been using a management company for years, Gregory Pennington,

and they sort out my creditors etc, les me sleep at night although the debts take forever to go.

 

Ive just received a rather aggresive letter from Arden Credit Management for a debt balance of £19, 732.45.

 

I have no idea who they are, I suspect they have bought the loan from Lombard (purely because of the amount owed) who have been getting payment from GP.

 

Not heard from Lombard to say they were passing the debt on.

 

Can I tell them to sod off or do I have to keep paying?

 

The debt is way over 6 year old but I understand that as I have been paying,

the 6 years hasn't actually started?

 

is that right?

any comments gratefully recieved - even if it is to tell me that I was a daft mare to get a Lombard loan to start with!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this debt is part of your managed accounts, then I would pass it to Gregory Pennington, after all, they are taking a percentage I assume.

 

Have you ever checked by CCA any of your accounts, and, have you checked exactly how much of your money is actually being sent to pay each debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't checked the older debt with CCA, buried my head a bit when the debts got out of control

 

I will pass this on to GP but its odd that the company hasn't said where the debt has come from. As I said, I presume its Lombard purely due the amount, but not absolutely sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I would send the 'prove it' letter in response:

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collectionlink3.gif, which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. AND in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to Trading Standards and also inform the Office Of Fair Trading of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also received a very blunt letter from Arden with regard to an outstanding debt with Lombard incured during a divorce

stating that 'the present situation of non payment is unsatisfactory' even though they cashed a payment last week.

 

The previouse company with whom I delt did not know that they had lost the account.

 

The agreement was reached via a CCJ.

 

This outfit seem to be a bunch of clowns and chancers!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

If the payment was set by the Court, then Arden do not have any authority to vary either the amount or to whom it is paid. To change it they would need to go to Court and seek a variation - they'd need good reason for doing so and it would cost them.

 

The best course of action in these circumstances is to send a short letter to Arden:

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter dated xxxx, the content of which is noted.

 

Since Judgment in this matter was granted, I have maintained payment in accordance with the orders of the Court and will continue to do so unless the Court orders differently.

 

Yours etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...