Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credit Overpayment


weareathome
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a joint Tax Credit claim with my ex partner. We split in May 2009 I told them within 7 days, the claim ended I made a new one. I telephoned and told them of our income for 2008/09 but I can't remember the exact date. My ex partner told them of the income details in a letter dated 25th August. TCO wrote and said we'd been overpaid as we hadn't informed them of our income for 2008/09. I telephoned them and they told me they only had information of me informing them but not him. I asked for an appeal pack, I heard nothing for about 3 months then got a letter from the recovery department demanding I pay back the overpayment. Went through the whole case again, the referred me back to TCO who I went through the story again and once again asked for an appeal pack. I at last received the pack, appealed the decision and have now been told my appeal was unsuccesful and that they believe we did not meet our responsibilities as set out in their Code of Practice 26.

 

I am really upset as we only earned what we said we were going to earn that year (he was self employed for part of the year and employed for the other) and I telephoned them with the info and my ex partner wrote to them. If they agreed we had both informed them there would not have been an overpayment as the income details were correct so the problem arises from them saying we didn't inform them of our income for the year. I am thinking of writing asking for all the information they have of our contact with their office but not sure how to word it. Also if I dispute the claim with them is it just going to come down to my word against theirs that yes we posted the letter to them informing them of the changes and them saying they never received one? Is it possible for me to maybe do a Statutory Declaration swearing that I definitely posted a letter to them? (it was me who posted it god forbid he would pay for a stamp lol)

 

To be honest I'm finding it difficult surviving on the money I'm getting at the moment without finding £1000 to pay back to them. They claim the overpayment was 1728.43 and they have already claimed back £672.62) Any ideas on what I can do next please, any advice gladly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No direct answers, but this might help....

I had one of these creeps chasing me for almost 4 years for a £2500 "overpayment".

Apparently, the ex was already paying the same back in installments. Me being a little more devious and suspicious, asked for proof. The only answer Tax Credits had to that was to up the ante with threats of court etc.

I tried the phone number for overpayments and had one hell of a bust up with the most ignorant woman on the planet. She wasnt interested in anything I had to say and simply kept repeating over and over again "Do you admit to owing this money"? It made me think that all she wanted was to get me to say yes in a recorded phone call ( No chance at all).

Finally she told me that "Overpayments" held no records and that I would be better phoning the helpline.

When I did phone the helpline, I got the antithesis of this bloody haridan - a very helpful woman who told me - after checking the dates they had and mine, and that they corresponded - that any phone calls made throughout a claim period, or indeed letters sent cancelling or altering a claim wouldnt necessarily put things right.

I cancelled my claim six months before it was due for renewal. When the automatic claim pack came ( six months later) I threw it in the bin thinking it wasnt necessary - it is! Seems that if you dont fill it in and send it back, the system automatically cancels any credits for that whole claim period - in my case it created a demand for £2500 which was half the claim for the first six months of the claim period.

The ex wife is paying the other £2500 back at the moment. Ive tried so hard to get myself to tell her that she shouldnt be repaying it but try as I might - I just cannot do it:-) Bloody cow:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...