Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wood v A&l ***SETTLED IN FULL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently sent my "Prelim Approach Letter" and yesterday received I reading along the lines of "thank you for your concerns, we are looking into the situation and will write to you with a more detailed response. Enclosed is a leaflet which explains the steps we will take to handle your complaint."

Enclosed was the standard Complaints procedure leaflet. Within the leaflet it explains the time scales in which A&L will write to me again. After 28 days they will write but in some case the may require more time to respond. In this case they can then drag the complaint out for 56 days.

Because they say they are investigating the compliant am I obliged to wait until I receive the response, even if this is 56 days? Or can I continue with proceedings and post my letter of action?

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forums.

 

You can ignore their timescales - this is your action to reclaim your money.

 

Simply follow the step-by-step guide as shown on this site, and don't be tempted to derail just because they think it should take longer!

 

Good luck

John

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long before they replied to the prelim letter?

 

Pardon my manners - hello and welcome:p

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I'd just say thanks for all the great info in the forum. Please to say that I received a cheque for my full claim against Alliance and Leicester yesterday!

Having never made a claim before I was very nervous but I stuck with it and got my reward in the end.

 

Just one last quick question! Now that A & L have settled out of court is it my responsibility to register the claim with Money Claim Online as SETTLED? The user guide reads the following so I assume it is but just thought I’d check: -

 

“Paying the claim in full

 

If the defendant chooses to pay the claim in full, including the court fees and costs, he will send or make payment direct to you. Once you are satisfied that any funds have cleared, you may wish to notify Money Claim Online that the claim has been paid in full. You can do this by email, telephone, fax or letter.”

Thanks All!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice one mate,how long did they take to settle from the date of the second letter?.And how much did you claim?

just in trested as i sent my final letter befor action yesterday for £3150.

Data Protection Act sent 17/June/06.......cheque cashed 24/June/06:o

1st Letter asking for it back sent 02/08/2006:|

LBA sent 14/08/2006:(

MCOL ISSUED 31/08/2006:)

A/L acknowledged 01/09/2006;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was only a small amount, £315.42. They applied for the additional 14 days to put a defence together but paid up within this time.

 

I have just received a form from Money Claim today to confirm that I have received my payment and I can confirm I wish to stop proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Robbiedonkey, from 2nd letter they gave me the standard letter again. Follow this up by issuing your claim online with Money Claim, it will cost £30 but you do get this back, and as I said above they paid within 28 days. Estimate for you at this stage 2 months tops if it goes they way mine did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations Bazza. I have merged your threads so people claiming now can see how long it has taken you. You are living proof that the FAQ's and step by step instructions work if you just read them and follow them. As a mod it is heartening to see someone succeed who had just done the research and got on with it without the need to ask questions that are clearly addressed in the FAQ's etc.

 

Well done

 

Could I ask you to spare a minute to complete the survey, and make a donation if you feel the site has helped you to get your money back.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...