Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Removal - katenandpete v HSBC **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, long story short...

 

Got my credit reference files a while back. There was a surprise, HSBC had defaulted my credit card account for £96 on 12/08/04. There was still £600 owed on the card which i was paying at an agreed rate of £50 per month. I certainly never received a default notice.

On 26/06/06 I sent HSBC a CCA request for the credit agreement and default notice. No response. I stopped paying the account on 03/08/06. On 09/08/06 i sent them an LBA stating they had not complied with the CCA, that I no longer recognised the debt and that I required them to remove the default notices from the credit reference files. I gave them 7 days to do this. Their time is up tomorrow.

This morning I received a usual statement from them with a £12 late payment admin charge applied to the account.

 

I would like some advice on 2 points:

 

1. My wife thinks I should contact them and request they remove the charge as they are in default of their obligations under the CCA. I think I should just ignore today's statement and proceed with my threat to seek a Court order to remove the default (assuming I receive no correspondence from them tomorrow).

 

2. What's the next step? I know this is answered somewhere else on the forum, but i can't find the exact procedure (even though i've studied sarrahk and surlybonds threads). I need to pop down to the County Court. Which claim form do I need and what sort of things should i put on the particulars of claim? I guess this is a breach of the Data Protection Act as they haven't substantiated the data they are processing.

 

Help greatly appreciated - even if you just point me to a relevent thread.

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Do you still owe them money? I think it would be difficult (if not impossible) to remove if you still did :?

 

Does this apply if you still owe them money because its all made up of bank charges which you are reclaiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, thanks for the replies.

 

Yes, I still owe them £600 of which only £30 or so is unlawful charges.

 

Of course, i've got no problem with paying what i owe them and was doing this at £50 per month.

However the default was a surprise as i didn't receive a notice.

I read http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/10900-loan-company-cannot-supply.html, http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/11659-how-get-your-default.html and http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hfc-household/5952-alanfromderby-hfc-cca-1974-a.html and sent off a CCA request for the original agreement, default notice and any deed of assignment. I got back diddley-squat.

According to alanfromderby, the debt is now unenforcable as they have not provided proper documentation. In effect, the debt does not exist and I can claim under the DPA for incorrect data (the default) to be removed. As i understand it, i am legally entitled to stop paying the debt at this point.

 

I'd really appreciate some clarification on the situation. I don't want to be looked on as a non-payer, like I say i've got no problem with paying what I owe. However I do want HSBC to comply with the law.

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just reading

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/10900-loan-company-cannot-supply-7.html

 

carefully again. Is it really true that I can also now claim back all the money i've paid them? If so, I should probably have put that in my LBA. Maybe I should send them another?

Come to think of it, i've got no idea how much i've paid them. Perhaps I should DPA-SAR them first and get all my statements.

 

Thoughts anyone?

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent a request for your original credit agreement etc and they did not respond in 12 days they are in default.

If they did not respond aftre 30 days they have committed a criminal offence and the debt in in my view unenforceable.

If the debt is unenforceable you should be sending them a s10 /s12 statutory notice to desist from processing data and to have default removed.

But if youve read sarahk thread you know that already!!

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A s10/s12 statutory notice. Great, thanks. There's so much information on this site i get confused. What do you think about DPA-SAR-ing them and claiming everything i've paid back. When I read about that i thought it was very cheeky, but after all they are a large financial organisation that should know the CCA inside out (and not commit offences under it!).....

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DPA-SAR will get you all the information you need for the account. I do however think that the objective is to get the default removed.

Surly bonds has placed a template letter in the templates section for exactly this.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry if i'm hijacking this thread but this has happened to me with the "Egg" brigade. I am in court on 13th Sept. Have sent notice and fee for default notice etc. They credited the £1- fee to my egg account...noticed it on line!! well over 30 days, no response. Called them with quick reminder...Nothing. Any advice would be appreciated. On my original court claim form I have requested removal of the default.

Woolwich won in court/default removed Barclaycard Settled Halifax settled

Capital 1Settled GE Money Settled

Egg Settled-court action re.default 4th hearing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they havent sent you the documents you have asked for , assuming these to be the credit agreement and the default notice then they have committed a criminal offence and the debt is unenforceable.

 

Whats the court date for? Is it to have the default removed?

 

I suspect they will settle before the court date and remove the default.

 

As it is considered a criminal offence for them not to supply the information under the consumer credit act i cant really see them trying to defend it, can you?

 

I would write to them now stating that they have committed a criminal offence etc and demand they remove the default immediately.

 

Check with the CCA 1974 and quote it.

 

Good luck

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Data Protection Act-S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) will get you all the information you need for the account. I do however think that the objective is to get the default removed.

Surly bonds has placed a template letter in the templates section for exactly this.

Yes, you're right. One step at a time.

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, in sarahhk's thread, she's using s.10 / s.12 to remove a default on a settled account that has been closed. My account was still 'live' (and as far as HSBC are concerned still is as they haven't acknowledged that I no longer recognise it as they have committed an offence under CCA s.78(1)). Am I squeaky clean and in the same situation as sarrahk, all because they haven't sent my credit agreement?

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, in sarahhk's thread, she's using s.10 / s.12 to remove a default on a settled account that has been closed. My account was still 'live' (and as far as HSBC are concerned still is as they haven't acknowledged that I no longer recognise it as they have committed an offence under CCA s.78(1)). Am I squeaky clean and in the same situation as sarrahk, all because they haven't sent my credit agreement?

 

Under the CCA, HSBC cannot enforce the agreement. I don't know if this is sufficient for default removal but it's a good argument. You certainly don't have to pay them anything towards it and they can't charge interest until they provide a credit agreement.

 

If they don't have an agreement, it will be totally unenforcable.

 

It becomes unenforceable after 12 working days when they default. They commit an offence after one calendar month, but the debt has already become unenforceable at the 12 working day mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When debt becomes unenforceable (one month after the company default- so according to the Act that is one month after the 12 working days)there is no agreement, i believe that they would need to go to court now if they produce the agreement. The signed agreement has the part about agreeing to your details being passed onto credit reference agencies......so if there is no agreement, then they cannot and should not have passed on your details and are in violation of the DPA. NO agreement= no debt=no right to pass on your details or issue default

Link to post
Share on other sites

When debt becomes unenforceable (one month after the company default- so according to the Act that is one month after the 12 working days)there is no agreement

The debt becomes unenforceable when they default, not when the offence is committed (one calendar month later):

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When debt becomes unenforceable (one month after the company default- so according to the Act that is one month after the 12 working days)there is no agreement, i believe that they would need to go to court now if they produce the agreement. The signed agreement has the part about agreeing to your details being passed onto credit reference agencies......so if there is no agreement, then they cannot and should not have passed on your details and are in violation of the Data Protection Act. NO agreement= no debt=no right to pass on your details or issue default

OK.

So, there is no agreement.

Now I need to send them a s.10 / s.12 statutory notice. In sarrahk's thread (i should really link this ... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/20118-default-hell.html

there.) Surlybonds put a template covering letter up. It doesn't quite fix my circumstances, so i've altered it and would like some feedback on the wording. Here it is

 

FORMER ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

As per my letter of 9th August (enclosed) I no longer acknowledge this debt to your company as you have not provided proper documentation. Furthermore, I believe that you have committed an offence under s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

You have placed a default marker on my credit files in relation to the above former account. I am contesting this continued processing of my data is an unwarranted act and I enclose a Statutory Notice to that effect, which is deemed served as of the date noted on the Royal Mail's Recorded Delivery service audit.

 

As you are aware, I am afforded principled rights under Schedule 1, Part 1 ("The Principles") of the Data Protection Act 1998 in relation to the manner in which my data is collated, stored and processed. Of particular note are Principles 3, 4 and 5:

 

"3. Personal data shall be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purpose or purposes for which they are processed.

4. Personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date.

5. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or purposes."

 

In my case, you are retaining and processing data (whether or not this is a simple renewal process of the default flag, daily or other timed factor) after the termination of the contract. As that contract is no longer in situ, then my written permission has also ceased from the date of the termination, which I will take to be the date I beleive you to have committed an offence under the CCA, the 28th of July 2006.

 

Principle 2 states:

 

"2. Personal data shall be obtained only for one or more specified and lawful purposes and shall not be further processed in any manner incompatible with that purpose or those purposes."

I emphasise the term "specified ... purposes" as in that specified within the contract, and no more. I also emphasise the term "shall not be further processed".

 

As you are unable to provide me with a copy of my signed credit agreement, I contest that there IS NO SUCH AGREEMENT to process my data. If you are subsequently able to provide a signed credit agreement then I contest that, as per your standard terms and conditions, there was only permission for you to process my data during the term of that contract. It would neither include any other permission, nor would it have implied that your percieved 'rights' to process my data would be in perpetuity.

 

Also, I do not recall any clear statement that gave my expressed permission for you to continue disclosing my subject data to third parties after the end of the contract. You should be fully aware that any non-agreed disclosure of personal data to third parties is a criminal offence under the Act. Section 35 only allows exemption to this clause if disclosure is necessary in the detection of crime and disclosure is so ordered by a Court. I do not believe that you have any such statutory obligation especially in such a case as this; alleged non-payment in a civil matter.

 

Should you believe me to be mistaken, and your standard contract does provide unlimited time extensions, then please provide me with the agreement indicating not only where I have signed, but also where this clause is specified. This should be sent to me as one of your enclosures, if you wish to contest the enclosed Statutory Notice.

 

You should be aware that you have, by statute, twenty-one days in which to either comply with my request, or give written notice stating your reasons and why you consider the notice unjustified. Any failure on your part to adhere to these timescales will automatically result in your non-complience with the statutory procedure. In that case, you will be expected to unconditionally comply with my Statutory Notice or I shall refer the matter to the Courts to ask for an Order to that effect. Should it be necessary to refer the matter to the Courts, then I shall also apply for Court fees and costs against HSBC.

 

I trust that I have made my position clear, and that you will make a serious effort to understand your legal obligations as a Data Controller.

 

I look forward to receiving your confirmation that my data file has been altered to remove all reference to my former account with HSBC, within the timescales indicated herein.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

kateandpete

 

 

I really need clarification on one point. In this, and in the Statutory Notice I say things like "I have been a customer", and "I have consented in my contract". Now there IS NO CONTRACT. Should i say "I MAY HAVE been a customer", "I MAY HAVE consented in my contract" etc. Or is it crucial that i recognise that I WAS a customer. But then again does this retrospectively recognise the agreement, thus negating their responsibility to prove that I AM a customer...???!!!?!?!?!?!?!

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, haven't got long so just a quick couple of pointers (I'll try to get back):

  • They have committed an offence under s78(6) of the CCA (which I've posted a couple of posts above) for failing to comply with s78(1). Might be best to just put s78.
  • You "contend" (i.e. assert) not "contest" (i.e. dispute) - otherwise you're disagreeing with yourself! :D
  • The contract isn't terminated; the agreement is unenforceable. There is a difference. Please note that it became unenforceable 12 working days after your request; they then commit the offence 1 calendar month later.

Hope that helps for now. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, conceded. I didn't want to correct the great Surlybonds' grammer!

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is the contract ended. as in "Also, I cannot recall any clear statement that gave my express permission for you to continue disclosing my subject data to third parties after the end of the contract."

??

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is the contract ended. as in "Also, I cannot recall any clear statement that gave my express permission for you to continue disclosing my subject data to third parties after the end of the contract."

??

 

This is what I'm thinking. Permission to disclose to credit reference agencies normally form part of the agreement... which is now unenforceable, so they have to no right to continue processing. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...