Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Isas already allow you to earn tax-free interest on up to £20,000 each tax year. But under recent reforms, they are now supposed to be more flexible.View the full article
    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • It can be frustrating when clients fail to pay for services or products rendered, ignore payment reminders, or claim an inability to pay. How quick do you pass to a Debt Collection Agency like www.corporatedebtrecovery.co.uk 
    • The Court s pretty informal. The Judge [who you call "Judge" rather than Sir or madam] will not be wearing a wig and gown just a suit and it is advisable that you do the same and a tie. Other than that the Judge will do most of the talking .If they haven't received a WS from the scrotes either the case will probably be thrown out straight away. Usually the Judge will ask their lawyer a number of questions then ask for your take on things and then the case will be decided.  UKPC 0 Mystic Bertie 5. Then ask for your expenses time off work [if not being paid by your company while in Court, travelling and parking costs and occasionally they will allow something like 5 hours research at I think £8 per hour. Later celebrate and post us the result and how much fun it was. You will wonder  why you worried about it so much. Next time will be much easier.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax and dishonest housemates - small claims court?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone and seasons greetings!!

 

I'm hoping you all can help me with this, on behalf of my boyfriend who was in a really terrible house situation earlier this year.

 

I won't bore you with too much of the details in context, but he lived with what he thought were 3 good friends, however for various reasons they fell out shortly after/during moving into their new house around about March 2009.

 

Two were students but had to drop out of uni because they were using student loans to pay their rent and not their fees, thus they were technically not liable for council tax. I am not sure if the council has updated their records to reflect this. My boyfriend and the other housemate were the only ones liable for council tax on record, although at the time they were all supposed to be splitting it equally amongst them.

 

After an intense few months (July 2009 I think), he had to move out because - without getting too personal - they are completely inhuman, irrational and pretty much psychotic!!

 

The £500 deposit he paid for the house itself was not given back to him, because they all ganged up and said that he owed it to them for bills. So, the girl who replaced him did not pay him the deposit and the agency didn't have to return it either because it was a joint tenancy. The kind hearted (too kind sometimes) guy that he is, he said fine, as long as it got him out of the house.

 

6 months later and it's obvious that once again they used his money not for bills, but to fuel their ridiculous unemployed, takeaway and drugged up lifestyle, as they managed to get his new address so that a council tax bill of £800 could be sent to him.

 

I'm not sure of the details such as the date of the bill, but it was for £600, and had £200 added as a late charge. Apparently it has been taken to court twice, although this is the first he has heard of it because he was not made aware of the letters in the first place. The bill has his name and the third (non student) housemate's name on it.

 

How on earth does he get out of this mess?? It isn't his bill to pay in the first place, but how do you prove it? Someone suggested that a small step in this would be to remove the £200 surplus, because he wasn't told about the bill initially, thus it is unfair to add a late charge. He is talking about going to small claims court, but who knows what this would involve?

 

I doubt this has any legal standing, but they did all force him to sign a silly 'contract' stating what the £500 would be used for, and it details the bills that they were supposed to pay with it. I'm pretty sure it said council tax on it and all four housemates signed this.

 

Would really appreciate your advice on this one, these vindictive girls caused a lot of personal problems for him and more than anything I want to see him move on and leave that messy past behind! :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't his bill to pay in the first place, but how do you prove it?

 

Can you clarify exactly what you mean by this - is the bill for dates when he was there, or not? If the bill covers a period when he was living there, then clearly he is liable. If he's given his housemates money which was supposed to be paid for council tax and they've spent it on something else then that is a seperate issue - the key thing here is that unless he has paid the council tax directly to the council, then as far as they are concerned he is still liable for this. He needs to contact them immediately to discuss this, as ultimately if he doesn't pay the consequences could be quite serious, it could even go as far as imprisonment for not paying council tax (although this would be an extreme measure).

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In hindsight he should have obtained a receipt showing that the money was to be used for paying utilities including council tax.

If there is a proof of a deposit receipt maybe the OP should consider a small claims against the former housemates.

Unfortunately we got caught by a landlord many years ago who kept our deposit on the flimsest of excuses and at the time we had no recourse. In the eighties £250 was a lot of money to loose!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you clarify exactly what you mean by this - is the bill for dates when he was there, or not? If the bill covers a period when he was living there, then clearly he is liable. If he's given his housemates money which was supposed to be paid for council tax and they've spent it on something else then that is a seperate issue - the key thing here is that unless he has paid the council tax directly to the council, then as far as they are concerned he is still liable for this. He needs to contact them immediately to discuss this, as ultimately if he doesn't pay the consequences could be quite serious, it could even go as far as imprisonment for not paying council tax (although this would be an extreme measure).

 

Thanks for your input.

 

As far as I know, the bill is for the dates he was living there. You are right, he is liable because his name is on the bill. The issue is that the housemates used his money for themselves and not the bill. He did contact the council and they basically said as far as their concerned he lived there and he needs to pay it.

 

It's not looking too good is it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In hindsight he should have obtained a receipt showing that the money was to be used for paying utilities including council tax.

If there is a proof of a deposit receipt maybe the OP should consider a small claims against the former housemates.

Unfortunately we got caught by a landlord many years ago who kept our deposit on the flimsest of excuses and at the time we had no recourse. In the eighties £250 was a lot of money to loose!

 

Thanks for the advice.

 

So if there is a proof of deposit receipt, even though it is a joint tenancy, he'd have a chance of getting it back? As the agency at the time said it was for them to discuss amongst themselves, as long as the agency received the correct amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...