Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • The CMA’s latest monitoring report on road fuel shows that prices at the pump have risen since late January, accompanied by above average margins and spreads.View the full article
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Monument Cca


Dotty50
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I requested a copy of my CCA on 4th December and received this reply from them. Would appreciate any opinions from others who have dealt with this company. It is currently up to date but they wrote to me a while ago closing the account, without any valid reason.

 

I wasn't bothered about it being closed but want to try a F & F in order to get it out of the way if possible.

MONUMENT REPLY - 16TH DEC.pdf

REPLY CARD.pdf

T & C'S - ORIGINAL.pdf

T & C'S CURRENT.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i would say no

thats an application card not a cca.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX and Blueda,

 

I knew there was a connection to BC, but this was originally with Providian.

 

Am I safe with the 'offsetting rule' as BC were never the original creditor?

 

I remember asking many times over the phone for details of the payment break plan but nothing ever materialised. So maybe SAR next to see how much I have paid on this and look to reclaim.

 

Unless any other suggestions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you Blueda,

 

Back on my cases now!

 

Will do SAR this week and possibly put account in dispute and stop payments from this month. Never been missed before but so fed up with the extortionate charges and would try to negotiate F & F ultimately.

 

Anyone else had any success with F & F for Monument?

 

Keeping my Credit file good, was so important to me a few months ago but I really don't see that it matters too much nowadays as from my experience getting further credit would be difficult in the current climate anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blueda,

 

I am subbing to a lot of F & F threads on here, I have tried with Halifax but no joy so far, although they have greatly reduced the interest rate (written confirmation still awaited).

 

Tried with one of my MBNA cards after being given a contact by a successful Cagger, but it didn't work for me, although it appears that quite a few have been successful with them. Anyway have now decided that until they produce a valid CCA, I will not be speaking to them again!

 

Do you mind me asking who you had results with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blueda,

 

I am subbing to a lot of F & F threads on here, I have tried with Halifax but no joy so far, although they have greatly reduced the interest rate (written confirmation still awaited).

 

Tried with one of my MBNA cards after being given a contact by a successful Cagger, but it didn't work for me, although it appears that quite a few have been successful with them. Anyway have now decided that until they produce a valid CCA, I will not be speaking to them again!

 

Do you mind me asking who you had results with?

Aktiv Kapital £1,153 settled for £440.00 Westcot £1,123 settled for £730.00 Barclaycard £2,079 settled for £831.00. An example of a settlment letter " Dear mr Blueda

We have received your payment in full and final settlement and the account is now considered settled. No action will be taken about any remaining balance.

The credit reference agencies will be notified accordingly ".

Dotty, make sure you destroy the credit cards before taking action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info Blueda,

 

Aktiv & Wescot, are they DCA's? I have seen these names on other threads, who were the original creditors?

 

Hope you don't mind all the questions!

Aktiv and Westcot are DCAs who purchased the accounts Aktiv ( Time retail ) Westcot ( stylecard ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, Blueda.

 

I see conflicting experience on here, some people seem to get better offers of F & F from the original creditors, then others state it is easier once the debt has been sold, I guess it just depends on the CCC or DCA.

 

I have now done SAR to send tomorrow, also preparing dispute letter, just need a little guidance on the wording regarding the fact that they have sent me what they believe is the CCA.

 

The other CCC's which I have put into dispute, I had not received anything at all so that was simpler to sort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easier said than done!

 

I have been going round in circles trying to decide what to send. All the letters I have saved whilst reading threads on here do not really seem applicable for one reason or another.

 

Monument did reply (just) in the statutory time but not with anything I believe to be enforcible, although they differ in opinion.

 

The ones I have put into dispute so far have either not supplied anything or sent unreadable copies so that doesn't apply here.

 

I have looked in the library but still unsure.

 

Any further guidance would be appreciated.

 

Or do I send one of these?

A possible letter sent when an agreement received is questionable.doc

FAILURE TO PRODUCE REQUIRED DOCS.doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd att

though it don't matter as they will disregard it anyway

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX and thank you.

 

Yes I expect to be ignored, I just want to ensure that I get it as right as possible, have done a few letters this week for other cards and it was all starting to get a bit blurry!

 

And without any alcohol! At the time anyway. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Sent this today, a bit of a variation but gets to the point and as you say, DX, likely to be ignored anyway!

 

Thanks for everyone's comments and assistance.

That is a very good letter Dotty,they can ignore it if they choose but will get the message when the payments are stopped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's only due to the letters I have read on here, I save any that I think may be of use at some point and adapt accordingly, must admit I was getting in a bit of a tiz last night trying to decide how to word it, but got there in the end.

 

Have had a response to a SAR on one of my other cards today, Capital one so will have my work cut out this weekend to decide where to go next with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR reply today, how quick is that?

 

Will scan letter asap but only sent more T & C's (slightly different to he ones sent in reply to my CCA request, 3 General workscreen printouts, 10 pages of transactions, from 2003 to 2009 (Account opened in 2001) and 19 pages of.............. not really sure just a sort of tracking sheet from Feb 03 to Dec 2009. No details of application, not even the 'reply card' that they had supplied in my CCA request. Nothing relating to the Payment Break Plan that they are charging.

 

Perhaps they rushed it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, anyone still subbing?

 

This is the letter that they sent, I think I have read that they only need to go back so far, so how do you work out claim for PPI (or Payment Break Plan, as they call it!)? It assume it was paid from the start but it stopped in May 07! The sheets they sent with the SAR shows calls they made to me when I was a bit late with some payments but no call referring to cancellation of the PPI, very strange!

 

Does anyone have any ideas, how to proceed? I have already put the account in dispute.

REPLY TO SAR - with deletions.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...