Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Quick Quid **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a payday loan recently with QuickQuid. Due to fraud being committed on my bank account, I was unable to make the payment which was due at the end of October. I made Quick Quid aware of this by phone and e-mail, and we agreed a payment of £115 to be made at the end of November, with the rest of the loan payable the following month.

 

However when I checked my bank statement, I found they had taken £225 from my account. When I spoke to them on the phone, they told me that they had taken a payment of £225, "just to see if it would be accepted"! They then became abrupt and refused to correct the mistake.

 

I've e-mailed them, and also written to the London address given out on their website, but I haven't received any reply. I'm now starting to receive calls at home and on my mobile.

 

Grateful for any advice you can give me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch channel 4, despatches I have dealt with all these monkeys, some are worse than others, dont worry about them, I am pleased to say I have 4 on the go as you will see on the programme 3 have come back accepting my offer the other has vanished for now. Change your bank account and cancel your card. Even better cancel your existing bank account if you can. Then e-mail them with an offer of payment don't talk to them. Stand your ground and tell them you are not paying anymore interest than you have.

 

Be strong these companies need getting rid off.

 

Mashmallow

 

XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over the last couple of days I'd been receiving a number of calls from Quick Quid both at home and on my mobile - all saying that it's "most important" that I call them before their closing time of 9pm. I sent them another e-mail explaining my situation, and I received 5 calls during the time it took me to type it!

 

I'm speaking to the CCCS about getting my finances back in order and have e-mailed Quick Quid if they would accept a repayment plan of a fixed amount each month. I'd like to make the payments over the counter at the bank or via internet banking but I can't find their bank account details anywhere. Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

An update

 

I e-mailed Quick Quid complaining about the telephone calls (which I was receiving about 5 times a day). I explained that I wanted all communications with them in writing, and mentioned the Protection from Harassment Act, and after a couple of days the calls stopped!

 

I really want to get myself out of debt and clear this loan, but I don't want to give Quick Quid my new debit card number. Does anyone have their bank account details so I can make payments by standing order - I've asked Quick Quid for this a couple of times, but they refuse to hand the details over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd keep the money you want to pay them to one side and then report them to Trading Standards for frustrating your efforts to make payment. Then send QQ an email advising them you have reported them to TS. Write in capitals in the title of the email **URGENT RESPONSE REQUIRED - PAYMENT WAITING TO BE MADE"

 

Then tell them they have been reported and you need their bank details to make payment.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hepburn C

 

These lot will usually look to get their money back over 3 months and will refuse payment plans that don't achieve this.

 

As Ellen suggests just keep the money to one side until they see reason or pass to DCA of their choice (who will have no alternative but accept monthly payments you can afford). They do sometimes offer attractive full and finals before they pass on. Up to you if you accept.

 

Ultimately their stubborness means they wait longer to get paid ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Just to give you an update with my repayment with Quick Quid. Total balance owed was £312 and when I received an email requesting the immediate payment, I replied stating I would pay in 3 months frm Janary to March each time paying £100.

 

To my amasement they sent an email today accepting the plan and gave details of how to make the payments into their account.

 

This may be down to the fact (as others have mentioned) of it being within the 3 month period.

 

Cheers

 

Willo

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This may be down to the fact (as others have mentioned) of it being within the 3 month period.

 

 

It may also be down to the fact that they read these forums ;) and don't want reporting to Trading Standards (again!)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"just to see if it would be accepted"? wow, they're doing experiments on your account after they've entered into agreement not to take the money? If you have the agreement in writing you could take them to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

H I Smithblack

Am still getting the 90 days past due letters on email- the proposed plan i made in nov of £337 for 3 months which I couldn't paqy will expire on 28th Feb so i guess they will pass on then.

Do you guys think mac hall will be ok to deal with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...