Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCA after shortfall on Mortgage Repossesion


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6461 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering with the vast knowledge on this forum whether anyone could provide some needed advice.

 

In a past life my house was repossessed (March 1999 ) and then subsequently sold by the bank with a shortfall. Correspondence was sent by the bank in August 2002 which advised the shortfall. I did not acknowledge debt in writing although there was a subsequent phone call. Years passed & now a further agent on behalf of the bank has caught up. I have had conversations with them however again I have not acknowledged anything in writing.

 

Although the date of repossession was March 1999, the date of sale is not stated in any correspondence.

 

On advice from CAB ( and another well known forum ) I wrote to the DCA & transcript as follows;-

 

" I refer to previous correspondence in respect of the above and apologise for the delay in replying to this matter.

 

Due to the nature of the correspondence, I needed to seek professional advice before replying to you in writing.

 

Following the advice provided, I would be grateful if you could request from xxxxx full details of how the amount allegedly owed is calculated. Please therefore arrange for the following details to be provided;-

 

  • Full Statement of Mortgage Account to include a complete list of transactions and charges relating to the account since its opening including charges accrued for arrears and missed payments.
  • Date of Sale and amount received by xxxxx following the sale and expenses associated with such sale.

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter in writing advising whether you are able to arrange the provision of this information. Should you not be in a position to provide this information, please provide me with the contact name and address of the xxxxx representative to whom I may write requesting the above.

 

Until the above information is provided, I cannot be in a position to admit liability for the amount in dispute therefore please refrain from further recovery action until the above is received."

 

I received a reply dated 26/7 following my reminder 18/7.

 

"My client can not detail a list of transactions since the start of the mortgage as it would take a lot of manpower and time to do this. Below are details available

 

Up until the date of repossession the arrears wrer £xxx.

 

1. balance at redemption was £x

2. Sale proceeds were £x

3. Estate Agents costs were £x

4 Solicitors costs weer £x

5. VAT recoverable was £x

6. Total outstanding £x

 

The letter goes on to say that their client believes that I now have had long enough to deal with this matter & there initial agreement offer to pay 40% of the debt will no longer apply should I not accept by 20/8.

 

Yesterday I received a letter stating I had failed to cooperate even though I have until 20/8 to reply & If I do not reply within 10 days of their letter dated 8/8 then the account will be transferred to their Legal dept to "review feasibility of forwarding account to solicitors for recovery through legal process.

 

My questions now being ;-

 

1. I've requested a full breakdown of charges etc which the bank/DCA have failed to provide. There is a significant discrepancy between what was outstanding and amount allegedly owed. Also the amount the has was sold for was if I can recall, far in excess of the original mortgage amount.

2. There was a mortgage indemnity policy attached to the loan therefore, am I entitled to know any recoveries against this ?

3. Members of the CML have agreed not to persue mortgage debts where no contact / agreement etc in place 6 years from the date of sale. ( Not sure of excact date as the still have not told me ) but would assume before Apr 2000. Should they therefore still be persuing this.

 

Any additional help / advice on this subject would be gratefully appreciated. I do intend to challenge their letter as the information requested has not actually been supplied.

 

Sorry a bit long winded but tried to get as much fact in as possible.

 

Many thanks.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman
If there has been no payments and no contact between when they repossessed the house and now then as far as I can see the debt will be statute barred but I may be wrong im sure someone who knows for sure will post a reply soon
12 years for secured debt not 6.

 

Paragon v Banks & Halifax v Grant The Court of Appeal made a decision. Thats is that the limitation period for mortgage lenders recovering mortgage shortfall debts is 12 years (Section 20 of the Limitation Act 1980).

 

As to the rest I will post latter on some pointers only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed Zooman re 12 years on secured debt however Council of Mortgage Lenders agree not to persue after 6 years I believe.

 

One of my main gripes though is lack of detailed information from DCA or lender as I cannot see how so much can be owed in view of a relatively small mortgage initially & an alledged arrears amount of circa £1600. They say amount owed is over £16k.

 

Thanks for responses so far though.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

How much did the house sell for?

 

What was the house true value?

 

How much was the full amount owed at the time (arrears and principle)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Zooman,

 

Arrears to date of repossesion - £1342.70

Balance at Redemption - £47 705.79

Sale Proceeds - £32 000.00

Estate GAent Costs - £910.62

Solicitor Costs - £194.37

VAT Recovered £185.83

 

Total o/s - £16 624.95.

 

They have however ofered to accept £6 700.00 as a full and final settlement.

 

There was a Mortgage Indemnity policy in place however I no longer have any copies.

 

Thanks

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I really don't know as this was March 1999 & prices have gone through the roof since then. I've checked on a website & currently prices are circa £110k but then, £32k was probably just short of market value - suspect would have been £40k (ish) with the right buyer.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...