Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nearly There?!?!


danhall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There

Have been reading through this site again to try and find out the info I require, but would be grateful if anyone could help me clarify what I need to do next?!?

I'm claiming £814.50 from BOS and after sending my 'Letter Before Action' have just received a letter offering £137.00 as 'a gesture of goodwill' - I'm clear that I should accept this, but is there a letter in the library that I can use to accept the £137.00 which states that I will continue to make a claim for the rest?!?

I'm a bit confused as to what I am actually saying to them next and also if I accept some monies, what does that mean in terms of schedule, ie. My last letter said that they wouldn't hear from me again until I made a claim?

Hope this makes sense!?!?! Feel close to the finish now and am determined to go all the way and take the slimey B@#*ards for all I can!!!

Any help or advice would be very much appreciated.

Thanks!

Dan

'Non Illegitimati Carborundum'

('Don't Let The B*****ds Grind You Down')

 

________________________________________

 

  • Bank Of Scotland - Claiming £1221.27.

  • 17/7/06: Sent Prelimary Request For Payment. :)

  • 20/7/06: Received reply saying Customer Relations will investigate and I will receive reply 'no later than 4 weeks'! :mad:

  • 1/8/08: Sent Letter Before Action. :)

  • 8/8/06: Received letter offering 'Goodwill gesture' of £137.00, which I have replied 13/8/06, saying I would accept as part payment. :|

All quiet on the Western Front - no contact from them...

 

  • 29/8/06: issued Court Claim via Money Claim Online for £1221.27 - Keep your fingers crossed because I have just paid £120 Court Fees and am a little nervous. . . ! ! ! ! ! :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

im under the impression you should say no chance to the measly offer and say you intend to carry out said action in pursuit of the total amount.

 

think the bank would only give the £137 as a full and final settlement.

 

edit, just read your post again, looks like its def time for you to file your claim at the local court, good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there is a letter in the temps folder to address this.

Their letter looks kike it has crossed with your lba.

 

you could send something short and to the point along the lines of;

 

Account No ref

 

Dear.........

 

 

I acknowledge reciept of your letter of .........and note your offer of..........

 

As indicated previously in my letter before action sent on ......... I am seeking repayment of the full amount £.......

Therefore I am unable to accept the offer,being that it falls considerably short

of the total amount being claimed.

I would of course consider this as being part settlement,but will still be pursuing the remainder through the County Courts together with costs and interest at 8%.

 

Please be advise that this action will commence after the 14 day period as indicated previously.

 

I trust this clarifies the matter

 

yours

 

etc

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick replies.

 

The other issue is that I have been consistent in sending all correspondence to the BOS Head Office address at The Mound in Edinburgh. The replies I have received have been from addresses in Leeds and just to make things even more complicated, they letter of the £137 offer came from an address in Leeds and the pre-paid envelope they sent me was for another address in Leeds! So, maybe this is why the letters may have crossed in the post.

 

Should I continue sending correspondence to the BOS Head Office in Edinburgh, or now start sending letters back to the named individual who was replied to me?

'Non Illegitimati Carborundum'

('Don't Let The B*****ds Grind You Down')

 

________________________________________

 

  • Bank Of Scotland - Claiming £1221.27.

  • 17/7/06: Sent Prelimary Request For Payment. :)

  • 20/7/06: Received reply saying Customer Relations will investigate and I will receive reply 'no later than 4 weeks'! :mad:

  • 1/8/08: Sent Letter Before Action. :)

  • 8/8/06: Received letter offering 'Goodwill gesture' of £137.00, which I have replied 13/8/06, saying I would accept as part payment. :|

All quiet on the Western Front - no contact from them...

 

  • 29/8/06: issued Court Claim via Money Claim Online for £1221.27 - Keep your fingers crossed because I have just paid £120 Court Fees and am a little nervous. . . ! ! ! ! ! :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...