Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help please- RBS cannot not comply with SAR


Zaraphin
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Been trying to get the Royal Bank of Scotland to comply with a SAR for relatives, eventually they have sent a letter with some statements and a letter stating that they are unable to locate all 7 loan agreements they have had over the years (which are all paid up now) with PPI .

 

However they have enclosed Policy documents relevant to these loans (all they sent was two copies of a policy which are no help as they are not quite sure of the dates of the loans or figures as there is no dates on a few of the agreements they do hold themselves (about 2 Credit Agreements) but because the loans ran into each other they do not have settlement figures. Another relative has informed me that they have had a letter from RBS stating that they can only hold records for 8 years (is this true can anybody advise). I shall post letter up for you to have a look at and maybe somebody can help me help them.

 

Any advice help would be graciously appreciated.

 

RBS Letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

As far as I am aware, a bank is only obliged to hold documents for a period of 6 years AFTER an account is closed. If any accounts are still "live" then they should keep a full paper trail.

 

If you are after copies of agreements then a CCA request for each account could bring forth some information (but not guaranteed).

 

Could you let us know what you are trying to achieve from the SAR's

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi silverfox

 

What we were hoping to achieve when we sent away for a Subject Access Request was to hopefully get all info on the PPI that they had paid to these loans as they should never have had PPI sold to them as they were told they had to take it out or they would not get the loans and as they were only working part-time at the time each only 15 hours each this type of PPI would not cover unemployment sickness or redundancy.

 

The last loan was paid off 20 moths ago and with them all running into each other there is surely a connection so would the bank still have to keep paper work (if therewasa connection) I think what they are trying to say in there letter is that it would be too hard for them to find it, and I think in such a major establishment as the RBS that is shocking that they cannot kepp a filing system up to date.

 

They already do have 2 of the original copies for 2 loans (their own copies) but no settlement figures that would allow them to calculate the illegal PPI they were sold.

SW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi silverfox.

 

WHat we hoping to achieve was that the bank would supply all info on the PPI they had paid to these 7 loans as they all ran into each other surely there should be a connection so the papaerwork should be available I thinkwhat they are trying to sya in their letter is it would be too much hassel to find them.

 

You would think a huge establishment like RBS would have some kind of filing system.

 

My relatives do have 2 original CCA for 2 of the loans but not sure what the settlement figures are and therefore cant calculate any figures to claim. But on the 2 CCA they have they do have figures for the PPI so if they RBS dont have any papaerwork could they put a claim in for the full amount of the PPI on both loans(I wonder what would happen) as they have proof they were sold but obviously RBS dont have any paper work to prove otherwise.

HAs anybody any idea if they can still put a claim in if they have the original paperwork and RBS don't.

SW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen somewhere where it says a bank is allowed to omit information if it takes a disproportionate effort to retrieve it.

 

You really need the agreements to see if the PPI was front loaded or whether it was added each month.

 

I'm not that good on PPI I have to add.

 

I think I'm right in saying that if the PPI was front loaded then interest was also added to the PPI.

 

The only way you are going to get an accurate figure is to get all the statements and agreements. You don't want to under calculate your claim

 

I would write back, explaining why you need this paperwork and if they don't respond, go to the Information Commissioner and the FOS.

 

This thread should really be in the PPI forum.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...