Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

AA loans/BOS - claim discontinued


myboro
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4114 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have an unsecured loan and due to redundancy have not been able to pay since January this year. Balance over £20,000 monthly payment £285. Went via CAB and proposed a token payment of £1/month in March.

 

Anyway all seemed well as proposal accepted - seemingly as an ongoing amount. Checked my credit file and noticed it was defaulted as of 31/7/09.

 

Original Creditor is AA Loans and currently dealing with Blair, Oliver and Scott (Bank of Scotland DCA).

 

As I had no default notice queried with Blair Oliver Scott in August, recorded delivery complaint. No reply back so today I rang to find out what had happened. BOS stated AA would have defaulted before account was passed so needed to speak to them. Rang AA and initially said default issued in April, when I asked about proof of postage came back and said that they had not issued a default but asked BOS to send one when account was 4 months and a penny in arrears.

 

BOS had already stated that no default had been issued so I am asking what should I do now. If they have defaulted me without sending a default notice what does that mean.

 

What is the best way to move forward without getting into trouble. They accepted £1/ month without any fuss so I really do think they have done the right thing. What options are open and what advice would people give

 

:):):)

 

Many thanks

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I think you will need to get all that has been said in writing as they will deny everything that has been said otherwise.

As I see it, you could demand they remove the default but then there is nothing stopping them issueing another one (properly)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume they haven't terminated the account.....as Foxy has said they can issue one whenever they like, if they terminate and then issue a DN, then it would be an unlawful recission of contract.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On the phone both AA Loans and BOS stated the account was terminated but I do accept the only evidence of this is my credit file. AA stated that they terminate/default when an account is 4 months in arrears. As I was paying £1 a month this occurred when the July payment (5th) was missed. So they action-ed the default early July. However rather than send a default they stated they asked BOS to send it.

 

Date of default 31/7/09 on credit file, which fits with the dates stated by AA Loans.

 

How can I get this in writing without them trying to cover it up, they are no doubt aware of an issue following my phone calls yesterday asking when the default was issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try and SAR each company but to include all call transcripts (you may need to give them dates of calls)

With a little luck, any screenshots may show what they have done with the account

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OK, so they have now gone into cover up mode and I need advice as something seems wrong. I received the attached letter which now confirms they die not send the default and low and behold they have sent another.

 

What a shame I alerted them to the error, silly boy. Is there anything worth trying nor. I am obviously going to complain but feel as though they will cover everything up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off you dont say anywhere that you've checked that the agreement is enforceable - is it?

 

Unless they terminate, they can issue a DN when they like

 

and

 

Dont ALWAYS assume that there has to be a default notice issued for a default to be placed at a CRA. CRA's are commercial entities that tend to do what their customers want to be done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've unapproved the offending post, could you re-post without the personal details :)

 

Thanks for the 'heads up' mandyjayne.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops, think I'll ask if they would consider a write off in the circustances. Re the agreement it is valid apart from I believe it should be a multiple agreement as it paid off a previous loan.

 

In one sense a shame as they accepted my pound a month but its not as if they need the money really.

AAResponse.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

They confirmed the account was terminated when I first asked the question in October. As I said at first, reply now confirms no default was issued at this time. As I was made redundant and have nothing to pay I am going to simply write and ask the account be written off in the circumstances. Nothing to lose I guess!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Just to Update everyone - AA issued proceedings on this and I had a no win no fee solicitor defend

RESULT : Feb 2012 claim discontinued.

Great as balance was still over £20Ka

Link to post
Share on other sites

As above - they issued proceedings without a default notice. The agreement should also of been a multiple agreement but it was not. I have not seen the defense put forward as I was just happy to see this disappear! :wink:

 

Extract from dispute letter below:

 

"I am writing in response to your letter dated 9th November 2009 which now confirms in writing that no default notice was issued at the time our account with AA Personal Finance was terminated. Before your letter we could not be sure this was indeed the case and I thank you for confirming this in writing. Without being sure I felt it would not be wise to dispute the debt in case, for example the notice was simply lost in the post. Now your letter has made clear no default notice was issued we formally dispute the debt and we no longer offer token payments. This letter should clarify why we feel this is reasonable in the circumstances and propose a solution to this issue in both our best interests.

The consumer credit act makes it clear that a default notice is required when an account is terminated. Both AA Personal Finance and Blair Oliver and Scott made it clear on 27th October that the agreement had been terminated. This was also a matter of record with the Credit reference agencies for some months before this. What appears beyond any doubt now is that the account was terminated by AA Finance sometime in March 2009 without a default notice being issued. Your letter now serves as written confirmation of this and as a result finally clarifies what actually happened.

Therefore AA Finance terminated the agreement unlawfully at or around March 2009. Under elementary contract law in England AA Finance become the contract breaker and we are the injured party. As a result we have the option to accept the termination and recover damages. It is worth noting the following case in support of this position. In Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishka Kaisha [2007], Lord Bingham said:

 

'The repudiation of a contract by one party ("the repudiator"), if accepted by the other ("the injured party"), brings the contract to an end and releases both parties from their primary obligations under the contract. The injured party is thereupon entitled to recover damages against the repudiator to compensate him for such financial loss as the repudiator's breach has caused him to suffer. This is elementary law.

For clarity we ACCEPT THE CONTRACT TERMINATION given the circumstances.

So what does this mean, well the agreement is terminated now and as a result neither of us bound by its obligations. In addition you cannot now correct this by the issue of a Default Notice which you appear to be trying. There is no longer any agreement between us on which to serve such a notice. The only debt which we possibly now legally owe as a result is the arrears when the account was terminated. In your letter you states this is £581.34, which may or may not be correct.

Moving on from this I would ask you now to review the original agreement. The agreement may be unenforceable anyway as it is not set out as a multiple agreement. This is required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Part of this loan was kept by AA Finance to clear our previous loan. This means this was a multiple agreement and the original agreement was therefore wrongly drawn up. This in itself means it is also questionable whether a court would be able to enforce the arrears owed at the time of termination, namely £581.34.

Bearing in mind both these issues and in an attempt to save time, effort and future costs I ask you give serious consideration to the following simple resolution. Write off this account and remove all details of the account from the credit reference agencies."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...